I see there are more massive revelations to come from the Epstein Files which will , 'Shock the World'. https://spiritdaily.org/blog/just-the-beginning/ But by chance this morning I was listening to some left wing legacy media commentators this morning and I found it extraordinary. They appeared to be laughing at people who take the Epstein Files seriously. As though it were all weird fairy tales. I think left wingers are progressives who think the World is getting better and better because people are basically good. They find it impossible to believe in Satanic, evil people. It is as though they are blind.
But I also notice that many, many commentators both left and right wing are bemused by mention of Satanism. Because they have no Faith they do not know what to think or do about all this. You can see the puzzlement in their faces as though they are thinking, 'What is this?'
From the article Padraig posted above: “Because of the way algorithms drive people with like-minded interests together, because of the way people operate, they will be told that what they are doing is normal, it will be rationalised, it will be normalised, and then you will see almost a radicalisation process where their behaviour will be encouraged, and they will be told that everything they’ve been told, that’s told them it’s wrong throughout their life, it’s the opposite.” What could that be?
Weinstein is guilty as the sun is shining, you can be sure of that and he was for many years the main pedophile in Hollywood, however I believe he has been safe in Israel for a long time, just like Epstein. Take for example that by 2014 there were about 60 American rabbis wanted for pedophilia who fled to Israel. Maxwell was also arrested, but do you think the daughter of the former Mossad chief is in prison! Look at how Zelensky's closest associates who stole over 100 million are flying to Israel, their homeland, and Ukrainians are being deported from EU countries to the front lines to be cannon fodder... I understand what you mean and there is anger and a desire for justice, the royal families fell because they were the central power that had to be overthrown to establish the NWO. Later they realized that they had to change the culture and destroy ethnic states based on Christianity, that it was not enough to bring communism by force. Democracies are much more suitable ground because politicians are mercenaries whose selection you not only control, but you choose candidates as actors who have to look good, speak well, then you start programming them through London, Harvard and various Soros economic schools and put them in the left and right camps, then you create a narrative through the media and people think they have freedom, you destroy the few disobedient ones through media lynching scandals... However, let's even say that there is a scenario in which the order can be overthrown and the people can punish the perpetrators. In that scenario, the executor of the punishment must be more moral and honest than the perpetrator. At this moment in the USA we have 40 + million people who watch pornography regularly every day, support among citizens for gay marriage has risen from less than 10% in the late 1980s to close to 80% today. You have over 22% of those who believe that abortions are justified in the third trimester, which is more than double what it was 10 years ago, the number of transgender surgeries has tripled in the last 5 years... Without even getting into the number of abuse in families, mental and psychological violence, violence against children, etc. I would say that human society has become Sodom and Gomorrah, even if you punished all those pedophiles, which I absolutely agree with and which would be fair by all standards, human morality has degraded so much that the only way out is some kind of mass miracle.
Mailbag: What’s In A Home | Spirit Daily Blog “The main hall features a life-sized Cross with images of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and Saint John the Evangelist,” adds a Spanish video. “Current photos from the Department of Justice show a black box covering something at the foot of the Cross. But it wasn’t always this way. On January 30, 2026, the Department of Justice made a mistake and published a photo without the black box, revealing something disturbing. The photo showed that Epstein used the Cross for blasphemous purposes, as the person appearing in the black box was performing a dance at the feet of the religious sculpture. The ranch has other oddities, such as a garden shaped like a missile target and a giant indoor pool with a hot tub and a shower in the center.” All of the revelations coming from the emails of Epstein, pictures and such are truly horrifying. The sexual abuse of children, coded language, and blasphemy of Our Lord. This cross at the ranch and the box in front of it... then there is the email where he wanted the painting of the slaughter of innocents at the ranch where he reportedly killed 2 foreign girls and God only knows how many others. (I do believe New Mexico has just opened an investigation into this). Revolutions have been triggered over far less revelations than these disclosures. Most Holy Trinity—Father, Son and Holy Spirit—I adore Thee profoundly. I offer Thee the most precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges, and indifferences whereby He is offended. And through the infinite merits of His Most Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg of Thee the conversion of poor sinners.
As I said, they are all alive and free in Israel... Jeffrey Epstein's death announced by DOJ - the day before he died! He was found dead on August 10, 2019, and the documents date back to the day before. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/epstein-files-reveal-prosecutors-announcement-053833376.html
Its so suspicious. If he is indeed alive and in Israel okay he has escaped. But there is the Etetnal Judge and that tribunal he will not escape.
I really like Bassem Youssef humor, a comedian who previously worked as a heart surgeon. He is a Muslim from Egypt by religion, but you can see that his heart is in the right place, extremely moral and conscientious in many matters. This is reels so it's short. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wGLDvIRFjXA
Is Harvey Weinstein an immoral scumbag, absolutely! Is he guilty of what he was accused of, rape and assault? No. Owens did a great deep dive into the actual court cases, reading emails, etc. showing who the "victims" were and if you go online and find clips from the trial it's obvious it was a show trial. He was made an example of and even hints at this in interviews that he was thrown under the bus. He is now incarcerated at Rikers Island which is no joke. Compare that to the federal "camp" where Maxwell is supposedly at- huge difference. The fact that Israel is a pedophile refuge state, absolutely. I wasn't really shocked to see that photo floating about on social media of Epstein "spotted" in Israel. Rabbis being accused of ritualistic abuse has been going on since the 1800s and probably before then let's think of St. Simon of Trent. I absolutely agree democracies have paved the way to make today's society another Sodom and Gomorrah all over. It's why I believe laws will be passed lowering the age of consent and no one will say anything about it. Now I genuinely ask, does an executioner have to be more moral and honest than the perpetrator? I, in my complete ignorance on this subject would say no. Isn't that why we have laws made public and known, they stand above men because all men are sinners. Now consider juries, a group of people who are not considered morally perfect but who are presented with evidence inorder to prove that the law was transgressed. The end of The Three Musketeers comes to mind, it is not the musketeers that inact the justice but the executioner, a third party and they know and respect that. Thus they hand over the guilty party over to the executioner even though he is by no means indifferent to the crimes she had committed! But it has to do with the fact that we, imperfect people, are allowed to execute certain acts of justice as in accordance with God's justice. Does that make sense? I probably shouldn't be taking my examples from French novels. Let me try another example to illustrate what I am trying to say: I want to make my house beautiful and orderly inorder to imitate the Beauty of God. Of course my house being beautiful will never hold a candle to God's beauty but it's the attempt at imitating the attribute of the almighty God. So the same with justice, we are not necessarily able to be judges of our peers yet in seeking to imitate God's justice we are allowed to participate in that attribute, no?
That seems to describe what our world has become. It parallels the increased frequency of Apparitions of Our Lady since things began to really kick off in 1917. Our Blessed Mother is doing all She can to stave off the due punishment. May the Lord God have mercy on us all.
Your case seems sound. Is not a Mass said by a gravely sinful priest still valid, with the priest having to answer for his own part? As regards Weinstein, even if he's not as vile as many of the others, he seems to have been abusing his power. Still, his 'victims' were seemingly complicit and no one of them has handed back the rewards.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested and in custody on suspicion of misconduct in public office https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c70kjr9wjw0t
I had thought about the validity of mass in regards to sinful priests! However because a priest is consecrated and not necessarily appointed I wasn't sure if it could be the same.
It's disingenuous to have him stripped of his position, now. He was a fully-fledged member of the Royal Family when all this was going on. The rest of them shouldn't be allowed to dissociate themselves that easily.
I agree with you, and there are several good points that I fully support. As for Hervey, I really can’t say much because I haven’t followed it in detail, nor watched trial analyses. I’m the first to say that many actresses advanced their careers in that way; I know many were not genuine, but I also believe he used severe threats to destroy careers to the point of threatening total personal and professional ruin. Often, when opposing armies committed rapes in conquered areas, some women chose to commit suicide, some were physically forced, and some, to protect their families, ultimately agreed to the act—even though it is still rape, because coercion is being used. People react differently because everyone’s psyche is different, but I don’t think rape necessarily has to involve physical force; abuse of power from a position above, when your livelihood depends on it, often leads to implicit consent. Once a certain boundary is crossed, that line mostly shifts toward extremes: in drugs, where people start with soft substances, in crime, where minor thefts lead to serious offenses, and in sexual violence, where some start as voyeurs and the boundary shifts. If we look at the decades during which he operated, that boundary is always crossed into extremes, especially with people who are used to getting what they want, and when you tell them no, they become aggressive. With him, that aggression certainly wasn’t limited to verbal levels or just ruining someone’s career—it likely escalated to a physical level during that period as well.. Now, FBI documents have surfaced showing that he often visited Epstein and that they were long-time friends; he also visited Prince Andrew’s castle, who is now under arrest in the UK and appears in numerous photographs with underage girls. He hired former Mossad agents, specifically the firm Black Cube, which was suggested to him by former Israeli Prime Minister Barak (also accused of abuse), a firm run by Israel’s top military and political officials, to intimidate and frighten abuse victims and prevent them from going public. When you look at the profile of the people he associated with—many of whom are on lists of abusers and pedophiles—the methods he used, and the lengths he went to, it’s hard for me to assume he was merely a pervert or someone exploiting his position to advance careers. Add to that the fact that new documents are released every day, and the vast majority have never been made public, not even, for example, testimonies from 1993 that Feldman gave to LAPD about abuse back then. On top of that, he had the best lawyers in the country, who twisted a lot of things and took the whole case to another level. Again, I haven’t followed it closely, nor am I well-informed, so I don’t want to claim anything as 100% certain, let alone falsely accuse anyone I think we are talking about the same thing from different angles, or perhaps I didn’t elaborate my previous point clearly enough to make it understandable. Of course, I stand by what I wrote, because God created us in His image, and by that He gave us the power to create, but also to carry out God’s laws. However, when it is dark and you see the Moon shining and illuminating the Earth, that is actually a reflection of the Sun — that is, the sunlight that the Moon merely reflects like a mirror. When there is fog or thick clouds, that reflection of the Sun will not reach the Earth. Similarly, the further society is from God — who here, like the Sun, is the source of morality, justice, and truth — the more the reflection of our judgment (the Moon) will be obscured by thick clouds and fog (sin) and thus more distant from true justice. This does not mean we have no right; on the contrary, as you yourself said, it is our duty. But that duty and responsibility becomes distorted, because if truth becomes relative within ourselves, it will also affect the decisions we make. God gave the Jews the authority to judge Christ — they were the jury — and they chose to release Barabbas, the criminal, and condemn Christ. When a society loses its moral compass, the institutions that are supposed to uphold justice often become instruments of injustice. Rules are interpreted to justify wrongdoing, the weak and righteous can be punished, and the wicked rewarded. Law loses its authority because it no longer reflects universal ethics, but rather the will of the majority or those in power. In the end, courts always exist, communists, fascists, Nazis, corrupt kings, as well as good kings and moral rulers have all judged on Earth. The real question is only what kind of judgment it is. The fairness of a court comes from love or the fear of a higher moral authority (God). But when a society denies that authority exists, it turns to its own beliefs to satisfy human impulses and becomes willing to be corrupt, bribable, and similar, something I see in everyday decisions of institutions, where even pedophilia is justified from Bondi, FBI. Of course, this applies only when human corruption dominates the majority of society, because when only a minority is morally degraded, they still must respect generally accepted norms and laws. The problem arises when evil spreads and becomes socially accepted – then everyone feels it, and a fear of the “end of times” emerges. History shows that civilizations in such situations are often destroyed, either overrun by another civilization or struck by “punishment,” as in biblical stories: the Roman destruction of Israel, exiles, or Sodom and Gomorrah. I agree with you: society’s duty is not only to condemn sins, but also to act against the greatest crimes in the eyes of God and humanity. As Jesus told the Jews and the Pharisees: listen to God’s word, but do not do as they do – do not follow their example. The main question remains: who, observing human behavior, will take responsibility and administer justice in our society ?!
Yes, Harvey is a disgusting guy but I still stand by the fact that he was incarcerated unjustly. Like you so clearly pointed out, our systems of justice are now instruments of injustice. But you pointed something out I had never thought of in regards to abuse of power and implicit consent. So well said, everything! And yes, the question remains, who?
