I understand and respect why you want to at least give her a listen. Perhaps I should have said I believe her claims to be false. I wish I could speak to her directly to find out more about her reasoning.
This is true about the vaccines with fetal DNA. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not contains fetal DNA, but the Astra-Zeneca one does.
Also, I am very open to changing my mind.....I do not see my own opinions as absolute. Nor do I mean to disrespect anyone else. I am merely giving my perspective.
Why don't you try to contact her directly explaining your concerns and asking for clarification? I know she is very busy lady but you just never know what might happen! https://dolorescahill.com/pages/contact
Not at all - your background in Biology is much appreciated - Please feel free on the forum to register your viewpoint -
You are wrong, I have read here on this forum where it could be a disaster to pregnant women and in her future reproduction. If a person’s dna is disturbed it most definitely can be passed on In generations. It’s genetic harm! I totally agree with what God has revealed to Katfalls. It’s Bill Gates for Pete’s sake. His track records lie in eugenics. No offense. But I think for sure it will do spiritual harm. Our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit.
I've been thinking about this video content. Can anyone tell me why any organisation would want to patent coronavirus? This guy is talking about linguistic genomes. This is about coding DNA! Please tell me I'm wrong. You know where this is going.....
Always been very concerned about Dr.Fauci. He seems to be especially smug and empowered these days. Not to be trusted.
Did you read the comments beneath the video? The final two comments are interesting. One suggests that the assertion about the patents being illegal could be (probably is) incorrect. They point out that although the virus comes from nature, any modification to it does not, therefore, if the patent is for a modified version of the virus it is legal. The follow up comment pointed out that one of the patents is for a method of isolating coronavirus from humans. While those comments don't precisely answer your question, they do raise valid questions about the video. Partial truths tend to undermine rather than support arguments.
original antigenic sin (OAS) I just discovered this term. If you haven't heard of it, I suggest looking it up since it's something that happens with a vaccine! OAS is a medical term coined in the 60s by Dr Thomas Francis to describe an immune response setup by a first encounter with a virus from a vaccine. The concept is complicated for laymen, but I found this explanation: https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/res...tigenic-sin-committed-by-vaccination/#ref-551 The idea of OAS is that, instead of letting our immune system come into contact with germs in nature, our bodies have their first encounter with antigens via injections (aka vaccines) through an encounter called original antigenic sin: "First, let’s define how the body responds to natural infection. When a person gets an infectious disease for the first time, the body’s immune system uses its innate powers, which mostly involve cellular immunity. In the process, it prepares for the future. The next time that same infectious agent comes around, the body will use its memory of the first experience so that it can react faster. But after a vaccine, when the natural microorganism comes along later, the body will act according to how it was programmed by the vaccination and that is what is meant by original antigenic sin (OAS).." What the ?
Yes wow. Consider too that babies born in hospitals get jabbed right after birth unless the parents consciously intervene. So most would get this OAS encounter before baptism. I heard about this through Dr Tenpenny who was going through a list of all the things that could go wrong with the global initiative and she dwelt on OAS for a while. This concept would explain why they don't want the population getting herd immunity. The original sin approach is better for them I guess. Kind of fits in with the warning in your dream I think!
Another interesting thing to look at: the patents filed by the makers of the V products. Here are the Moderna patents: https://www.modernatx.com/patents These documents are hundreds of pages long and I would be surprised if the average doctors is aware of them. But I hear alternative docs talking about the content and in particular about how all these patented things will serve for the health issues created. Here is just a little sampling from one of the documents: "The disclosure features novel lipids and compositions involving the same . Nanoparticle compositions include a novel lipid as well as additional lipids such as phospholipids , structural lipids , and PEG lipids . Nanoparticle compositions further including therapeutic and / or prophylactics such as RNA are useful in the delivery of therapeutic and / or pro phylactics to mammalian cells or organs to , for example , regulate polypeptide , protein , or gene expression." They spliced up that sentence nicely, but it still says these things are useful to regulate gene expression. Isn't this supposed to be conspiracy theory? Gives meaning to their concept of original sin.
