I was shown in prayer some time ago that he is already condemned to hell even before he dies for his wickedness. There is no turning back for him. He's going to hell and very deep hell no matter. Prayer or not. No one , this side of Eternity can have any conception of the Harm this one man has done to the Kingdom of God.
I took my whole family to Italy this summer. We started in Rome and did a private Vatican tour. I felt cold there, very cold, very chilling. St. Peter's was like a amusement park more than what should be the holiest place on earth. One very interesting thing, as we going through the museum our guide stopped by a window and said "that building over there is where Pope Emeritus Benedict's resides now". I looked over at it and it felt like I was looking at a prison
I would never, ever bury that man's body in consecrated ground. I would refuse him the Last Rites. No Funeral Mass. ..and I would explicitly state , after his death, that he had been dragged by the demons to the very , very depths of hell because of his diabolical goings on as Pontiff. No interior reservations there. Mark Mallett take note.
You really hit the nail on the head with this one Terry. I agree 100% with your assessment and direction. Should you avoid Mark Mallett's blogs and threads about his writings Padraig? This thread about Mark's Our Lady's Little Rabble writing aroused some great, positive reactions but keeps getting side tracked into what Mark did or didn't say about Francis. This is your site Padraig and I respect that. You can post anywhere, anytime and kick me off if you felt it necessary. It's almost like you won't allow any MM positives to be discussed because you don't agree with his approach* regarding Francis. And can't seem to let it go. (*not path, we are all on the same right path here)
Unlike with Mark, MMM, you can discuss here. Everybody has the right to express their own opinion. With Mark he just posts and it's take it or leave it. When Mark did post here he left pretty briskly and angrily because he was contradicted. ( I know I still have his very, very angry emails) If he thinks anything written here is wrong he is very, very welcome back to say his peace. (People on this forum contradict me all the time...look at this thread..it's water of a duck's back..Mark doesn't even allow comments) You are expressing your opinion, I am expressing mine. Mark is very welcome to express his. He didn't appear to like free speech in the past, here on the Forum, but he is very welcome to have another go at it. By the way where did I threaten to 'kick you off''? I'm Irish; I enjoy debate. Tell me where can I go to debate freely and in public with Mark Mallett and I will do so? ( He never ever seems open to such,,,never, ever, ever, ever, ever....} He can do so now if he wants. I am waiting. I'd relish the chance. I really, really would..
Go to his Facebook page and comment there. He will answer and debate you publicly—but wait till the morning https://m.facebook.com/mark.mallett.752?tsid=0.7988243095930112&source=result
I love reading daily the 24 Hours of Passion by Luisa Piccaretta. Jesus knew at the Last Supper that Judas was about to betray him. When Jesus washed his feet he kissed them and wept at his feet and pleading and praying he would not so as much. Jesus' mercy for the Apostle who was about to betray him was unlimited, right up until the time Judas kissed him when leading the soldiers to him in the Garden. Why would Jesus not have the same mercy towards Pope Francis? Could it be, not enough praying and doing penance for him? Yet, every mass prayers specifically for our Pope. Were you shown that PF was not given mercy to the end of his life, or rather that you saw he rejected it? Can't think of more harm anyone could do greater then handing over, as a chosen apostle, Jesus over to the Romans for pay. Third Hour: From 7 to 8 PM The Legal Supper O Jesus, You now arrive at the cenacle together with Your beloved disciples and You begin Your supper with them. How much Sweetness, how much Affability You show through all Your Person, as You lower Yourself to taking material food for the last time! Everything is Love in You. Also in this, You not only repair for the sins of gluttony, but You impetrate the sanctification of food. Jesus, my Life, Your sweet and penetrating gaze seems to search all of the apostles; and also in this act of taking food Your Heart remains pierced in seeing Your dear apostles still weak and listless, especially the perfidious Judas, who has already put a foot in hell. And You, from the bottom of Your Heart, say bitterly, “What is the usefulness of My Blood? Here is a soul so favored by Me—yet, he is lost!” And You look at him with Your eyes refulgent with Light and Love, as though wanting to make him understand the great evil he is about to commit. But Your Supreme Charity makes You bear this sorrow and You do not make it manifest even to Your beloved disciples. Fourth Hour: From 8 to 9 PM The Eucharistic Supper The washing of the feet But, O my Jesus, it seems that Your Love has no respite. I see that You make Your beloved disciples sit down again; You take a basin of water, wrap a white tablecloth[1] around Your waist and prostrate Yourself at the apostles’ feet, with a gesture so humble as to draw the attention of all Heaven, and to make It remain ecstatic. The apostles themselves stay almost motionless in seeing You prostrate at their feet. But tell me, my Love, what do You want? What do You intend to do with this act so humble? A Humility never before seen, and which will never be seen! “Ah, My child, I want all souls, and prostrate at their feet like a poor beggar, I ask for them, I importune them and, crying, I plot Love traps around them in order to obtain them! “Prostrate at their feet, with this bucket of water mixed with My tears, I want to wash them of any imperfection and prepare them to receive Me in the Sacrament. “I so much cherish this act of receiving Me in the Eucharist, that I do not want to entrust this office to the Angels, and not even to My Dear Mama, but I Myself want to purify them, down to the most intimate fibers, in order to dispose them to receive the fruit of the Sacrament; and in the apostles I intended to prepare all souls. “I intend to repair for all the holy works and for the administration of Sacraments, especially those made by priests with a spirit of pride, empty of Divine Spirit and of disinterest. Ah, how many good works reach Me more to dishonor Me than to honor Me! More to embitter Me than to please Me! More to give Me death than to give Me life! These are the offenses that sadden Me the most. Ah, yes, My child, count all the most intimate offenses that they give Me, and repair with My own Reparations. Console My embittered Heart.” O my afflicted Good, I make Your Life my own, and together with You I intend to repair for all these offenses. I want to enter into the most intimate hiding places of Your Divine Heart and repair with Your own Heart for the most intimate and secret offenses, which You receive from Your dearest ones. O my Jesus, I want to follow You in everything, and together with You I want to go through all the souls who are about to receive You in the Eucharist, enter into their hearts, and place my hands together with Yours, to purify them. O please, O Jesus, with these tears of Yours and this water with which You washed the feet of the apostles, let us wash the souls who must receive You; let us purify their hearts; let us inflame them, and shake off the dust with which they are dirtied, so that, when they receive You, You may find in them Your satisfactions, instead of Your bitternesses. But, my affectionate Good, while You are all intent on washing the feet of the apostles, I look at You, and I see another sorrow which pierces Your Most Holy Heart. These apostles represent all the future children of the Church, and each of them, the series of each one of Your sorrows. In some, weaknesses, in some, deceits; in one, hypocrisies, in the other, excessive love for interests; in Saint Peter the lack of firmness and all the offenses of the leaders of the Church; in Saint John the offenses of Your most faithful ones; in Judas all of the apostates, with all the series of great evils which they commit. Ah, Your sorrow is suffocated by pain and by Love; so much so, that unable to contain it, You pause at the feet of each apostle and burst into tears, praying and repairing for each one of these offenses, and impetrating the appropriate remedy for all. My Jesus, I too unite myself to You; I make Your Prayers, Your Reparations and Your appropriate Remedies for each soul, my own. I want to mix my tears with Yours, that You may never be alone, but may always have me with You, to share in Your pains. But, sweet Love of mine, as You continue to wash the feet of the apostles, I see that You are now at Judas’ feet. I hear Your labored breath. I see that You not only cry, but sob, and as You wash those feet, You kiss them, You press them to Your Heart; and unable to speak with Your voice because it is suffocated by crying, You look at him with eyes swollen with tears, and say to him with Your Heart, “My child, O please, I pray you with the voices of My tears—do not go to hell! Give Me your soul, which I ask of you, prostrate at your feet. Tell Me, what do you want? What do you demand? I will give you everything, provided that you do not lose yourself. O please, spare this sorrow to Me, your God!” And again, You press those feet to Your Heart. But in seeing the hardness of Judas, Your Heart is cornered; Your Heart suffocates You, and You are about to faint. My Heart and my Life, allow me to sustain You in my arms. I understand that these are Your Loving devices, which You use with each obstinate sinner. O please, I pray you, my Heart—as I compassionate You and repair for the offenses which You receive from the souls who are obstinate in not wanting to convert, let us go around the earth, and wherever there are obstinate sinners, let us give them Your tears to soften them, Your kisses and Your squeezes of Love to bind them to You, in such a way that they will not be able to escape, and therefore relieve You from the pain of the loss of Judas.
Yes Ann, garabandal posted a very poignant interview. I've taken the liberty to paste it below for all to read. Tuesday, December 10, 2019 Ariel Levi di Gualdo, Jewish convert, Catholic priest, publisher of the theological Internet magazine "L'Isola das Patmos". (Rome) Ariel Levi di Gualdo is a sober, calm man, but it hardly remains quiet when he raises his voice. Yesterday, he did so with an interview and the usual clear words. The Jewish convert and Catholic priest said: "The Vatican is currently a circus that condemns truth and justice to death." And also: "The Church today treats those like Pol Pot who disagree within the Church." In the struggle between Judaism and Christianity, Ariel Stefano Levi di Gualdo decided for Christ and became a Catholic priest: born in 1963, he is a dogmatist specializing in the history of Dogma, a pupil of P. Peter Gumpel. With the convert's fire he sees many things sharply and says so. Before he became a priest, he completed a degree in Sociology, which he completed with the controversial work "Bitter Grasses - The Century of Zionism". At the same time it is a kind of reckoning with Zionism and a departure of the Jew from his Judaism. In the foreword he wrote: "The tremendous tragedy of the Shoah has returned the Jews the lost purity by producing the social taboo of worshiping the Jews, which prevents the public from being told that the Emperor is naked." In 2014, already a priest, he submitted a polemic against the homosexualization of the church. Already in June 2013, he expressed himself in connection with the resignation of Benedict XVI. about the "destructive mischief" of the gay lobby in the Church. In the same year he reported on his experiences in Munich and attested to the Church in Germany a "German" problem, which has already led to a "factual schism" - it's just nobody says it. On the case of Martha Heizer and her simulations of Mass he diagnosed the Church not too much, but to show little authority. The Church moans under the lack of authority. Such statements are not heard everywhere. Therefore, the ecclesiastical hierarchy did not make his life easy in recent years. In response to the situation in the Church, in 2014 he co-founded, with Msgr. Antonio Livi , former Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy of the Lateran University, and the Dominican Father Giovanni Cavalcoli , the Internet magazine L'isola di Patmos (The Island of Patmos), from which also originated an eponymous publishing house in the meantime. Since he was pushed out of pastoral care, he obtained in this way a much larger, albeit virtual, parish. In the first four years of its existence, the Internet magazine recorded more than 30 million hits. Below are excerpts from the interview of the daily newspaper La Verità: Question: What motives were at the beginning of the foundation [of L'isola di Patmos]? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: The need to pass on the foundations of the faith, but also as an antidote to the schizophrenia that prevails today. In the early 1970s, the physicist and servant of God Enrico Medi (1911-1974) said: "I am not afraid of nuclear power, pollution and tumors, but of the collective madness that the world is forfeiting itself to." Question: Why Patmos? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: This is the place of the last revelation, where the apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse in exile. There is an urgent need to create an island that preserves Catholic thought, understood as depositum fidei, and the Church's everlasting Magisterium - but this should not be confused with the ghettos and closed circles of the "chosen among the elect". One must do it like the monks who tried to save the precious scrolls at the fire of the Library of Alexandria. Question: Do you think that the Church is in danger? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: She is even in terrible danger. We are experiencing a situation of profound decline, for which I have not been able to find any historical precedent in history, but only some things that were vaguely similar: the crisis of Arian heresy in the fourth century and the fall of the Roman Empire towards the end of the 5th century. In other words, an epoch is coming to an end, and I hope it will end soon.
continued.... Question: When did the Church crisis begin? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: Even more than a crisis, it is a synthesis of all the great crises of history. It is a bit like the heresy of modernism condemned by St. Pius X in the encyclical Pascendi Dominici as the "synthesis of all heresies." The current crisis has emerged from a crisis of doctrine, and in turn has created a crisis of faith that has resulted in a crisis of morality devastating our clergy. Question: Do you think that Pope Francis bears responsibility for this? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: He bears enormous responsibility, as did all his predecessors since the apostle Peter, who was chosen by Christ rather than chosen by a cardinal conclave, and who nevertheless made it even worse: He denied Christ three times and even tried in his old age to escape from persecution by Nero, this time from Rome. He died on the cross on the Vatican Hill, in the Circus of Nero. Today, the Vatican is a circus where other capital punishments are executed at the expense of truth and justice - and all in the name of mercy, as we understand it. Question: Remember the Amazon Synod? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: The Pan-Amazonian synod was in reality an all-German synod. The German Church has been on Protestant detours for half a century, with ever-emptier churches, with a great blood-letting of believers, but with incomes from the church-tax in the amount of almost seven billion euros. It is a "company" with immense capital and property, but a lack of "staff" - which does not mean the employees. Therefore, she urges married priests. The viri probati, of which the Amazon synod was mentioned, are not intended for the Amazon region, but for the German church. Question: Theology is subordinated to entrepreneurial questions? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: Germans use Latin America as an incubation box for theologies like liberation or the people. The results we see: The Protestant sects are getting involved in Latin America. German ideologies, as history proves, have always been a source of failure. The Catholic Church is still absent from the list. Question: What do you think of the Pope's invitation to welcome immigrants? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: When the Pope solemnly expresses himself to questions of doctrine, of faith and of morality, I owe him obedience, faithfully believing what God's revealed faith commands. But when he begins to play games with Eugenio Scalfari, I have the right to express my disapproval and say that he would have done better to receive a divine man like the late Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, who, along with other three Cardinals, attempted to clarify open questions, but received no answers. The same is true of the crime that has brought armies of immigrants, in Italy especially Nigerian gangs, and the daily "isolated cases" in the chronicles and court records. Today we have bishops and priests who undermine the doctrine of faith, but nobody intervenes. However, anyone who sighs because of the new immigration "dogma" risks being lynched - always in the name of mercy, of course. Question: Do you feel discriminated against? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: Like every churchman who dares to express a touch of contradiction. The first to be ignored are the African bishops who oppose these migration flows, with the bishops of Nigeria at the forefront. The archbishop of Mosul in Iraq, Amel Nona, also warns against the dangers of indiscriminate reception, especially of Muslims. Instead of conferring him cardinal status, it was given to the Jesuit Michael Czerny, who put into his coat of arms a boat full of immigrants and made a pectoral cross from the wood of a boat that had transported illegal immigrants. Already in Greek theater of antiquity a tragedy was always followed by the grotesque farce. Question: You found very sharp words against the bishop of Belluno, whom you called a "whore", "apostate", "little satanic flag" for apologizing to the remarried divorced on behalf of the Church. Why such expressions? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: We have always accepted the sinners and will continue to do so. That is our duty according to the Gospel. It is a very different matter to accept sin and to allow sinners to the Sacraments. That is why I have found such stern words for this unworthy bishop as are typical of certain passages in the Old and New Testaments. What this bishop says and offers contradicts not only the everlasting Magisterium of the Church, but also the Scriptures, which are the foundation of revelation for us, which even the Successor of Peter can not change. Question: The Church in Italy is no longer taking a stand on the situation in the country, as was the case under Cardinal Ruini. Is that good in your opinion? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: I do not regret the end of the era of Ruini, who for 20 years at the head of the Episcopal Conference of the Italian Church has given some of the worst bishops she has ever had: never to speak for her priests and against problems, but they are always ready to bivouac in the antechambers and salons of political power - not least to gain advantages and embossed contracts. I have always been opposed to Church and clerical interference in politics and administration in the narrower sense. Question: Free Church in the free state? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: It is our duty to intervene and make our voice heard when elements are challenged or threatened that touch the heart of Catholic sentiment, from respect for life to respect for natural law. Question: What does the Church need today? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: The Church does not need dullards, but people who say "yes" when it's yes and "no" when it's no. It does not need more, or less. The "less", the culpable omission, also comes from evil. Question: Who would you see today as a model for the Catholics? Ariel Levi di Gualdo: I have no answer to that, because in order to propose models, credible models would have to be produced. At present, the Church is mainly producing opportunists and sycophants who make a career with migrant boats. These are the safe entrance ticket to the Episcopate and even the Cardinal path in a Church that is increasingly becoming a Cambodian regime - because of the merciful Church that is a "field hospital". Introduction / Translation: Giuseppe Nardi Image: LFQ (Screenshot) Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com AMDG
Just wondering if he is another 'Charlie Johnson'?? Mallet articles doesn't give room for constructive debates nor comments at the end of his articles. Thats why i stopped reading his. Its like take it or leave it re his articles as if he was the boss or arrogant...... God is boss not him. PF caused a lot of spiritual turmoil to many Catholics as its quite unbecoming especially coming from a pope. He cant be fired or expelled which was the main problem as our hands are tied. No amount of protest would do the trick except for money which i stopped contributing to peter pence. PF knew of the abuses that went on in school for deaf kids in his then diocese...what did he do next ? nothing as he just ignored that problem and sat on it until it became public. There was a video online somewhere when someone asked him a question with person name thrown in regarding abuse case. Guess what? Pope F was about to take off then surname thrown in then he turned his face & gulped to the person in question, it was very clear that he knew re his face cos nobody in the audience ever heard of that surname except for PF and the person who asked him. Think he has a little remnant of evil although i could be wrong there. Quote from E Burke : “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke. Why all cardinals doing nothing re PF? just because lay catholic people cant do anything or pull the strings as their hands are tied ?? If it was a private organisation or business then PF would be fired.
You said your not going to get into this to much, but yet you have spent a couple of days spewing hatred and telling us that Pope Francis is going to Hell. I would hate to see what to much would be like.
One time when I was meditating on the Passion I saw Jesus looking into the crowd for Judas. Even then he would have forgiven him. But I think now of what Malachi Martin said of the perfectly possessed. They cannot be reached because they have given themselves completely in free will. He said it was a shocking and terrifying thing to see someone who was completely beyond the mercy of God. The best thing to do was walk away and have nothing to do with them. Scripture tells us satan entered into Judas. I wonder if judas became perfectly possessed?
