They might have been fully vaccinated at one time, but with the immunity only lasting a average of four to six months, they are as vulnerable as if they were never vaxed. It’s usefulness was grossly exaggerated when they were trying to push this onto the public. The term “ breakthrough “ is also used to deflect from the fact that the vaccines protection is limited at best …NOT the science they sold this vaccine with. Since they don’t necessarily know when those who became infected with Covid had their last jab, the breakthrough cases could simply be that the limited immunity has worn off. So we have a lot of folks who had two shots who took the risk believing that they are protected only to find out that they are no longer protected, yet have all the possible future health risk that may occur from the experimental vaccine. And people wonder why we have no faith or trust in this government. Fauci recently admitted that they didn’t disclose all of the facts surrounding the vaccine to encourage everyone to get it! Who could ever trust anything these corrupt government officials say.
Oh that’s horrible for those who lost their job and for the poor staff left to handle the extra work and voids left by those who were forced out of their jobs. This is insane.
Someone posted a video or link to a video of an Israeli woman speaking about how they've been put under great restrictions there. I was watching it, and closed it by mistake. Could you re-post please. It was so very interesting
I wish he'd done a comparison to what blood tests look like after other vaccines like the flu shot. Also I'd like to see if the results go back to normal a few more weeks after the shot. Of course, with ongoing boosters...that's a huge repeat hit to the immune system regardless.
I would be surprised if anyone in Ireland has been prescribed any of those drugs on an outpatient basis, especially from the onset of infection. The monoclonal antibodies are probably the most effective of the treatments they named. Since their link to abortion is one of the reasons I'm refusing to take any of the available vaccines, I certainly won't be taking Regeneron's monoclonal antibodies even if they are a recommended early treatment here. I think that a company other than Regeneron also makes an antibody treatment but I don't know the name of the company, nor do I know whether they used aborted baby cells in its production or testing. That's why I have Ivermectin and all the supplements for boosting my immune system.
Beth, I am sure you already know this but I just read this article right now from Dr. Marc Siegel about this drug Baricitinib that they are giving to patients that are on a ventilator. It is already approved by FDA if it is given with Remdesivir (which your BIL already was given that worthless drug) but there is a 50 percent survival rate according to this article. In this later stage we have steroids (dexamethasone) you can read about dexamethasone here, the problem associated with it. https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MATHPressRelease.pdf to help calm the raging process and improve the chances of survival. We also have tocilizumab, a targeted antibody which can help block the inflammation and decreases death from COVID when given early, and Baricitinib, an anti-inflammatory drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis that decreases the risk of dying from COVID by almost 50 percent for patients on the ventilator. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/covid-prevention-treatment-cures-news-dr-marc-siegel Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2031994 Baricitinib https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...uthorizes-drug-combination-treatment-covid-19
Yep! I agree completely! Regeneron has the same ethical issues as the vaccine that we are opposed to.
I am leery of the new meds ending in “ib” and “ab.” I think they are biologic drugs. They use mammal parts and all kinds of Frankenstein blendings. They differ from the usual chemical compound drugs. I would not allow them in or on my body. A dermatologist tried to push one on me last Spring and I went to a different practice and was treated in a traditional manner. It takes lots of research online to learn exactly what animal cells are in them. The internet censors the truth.
Thank you so very much FN! I will share this with my sister! I was hopeful that the drugs you cited that I was unaware of until I read this article might be of value. That you very much for your input!!!
Merck’s New COVID Drug Is Making News — How Does It Compare to Ivermectin In the video Dr. John Campbell says: IvermectimnTmax - amount of time to get to maximum plasma Concentrations: 4 to 6 hours with a very long surprisingly half life of 81 to 91 hours ( he believes that it is more like 17 hours. Ivervectin has the ability to accumulate in the lungs. It stays in the lungs for a long period of time. Ivermectin effectivness using publicly available data, Campbell referred to one peer-reviewed study that pegs ivermectin’s effectiveness in early treatment at 62%, and an ongoing meta-analysis which shows ivermectin is 66% effective in early treatment and 86% effective as a prophylactic. Ivermectin Safety Using VigiBase, a WHO database on pharmaceutical safety data, Campbell showed that out of 3.7 billion doses given of ivermectin there have been only 5,693 reports of adverse events — far fewer, according to Campbell, than the number of adverse event reports associated with amoxicillin and ibuprofen, both widely used and considered safe. Ivermectin Cost: 2013 prices provided by the WHO, Campbell said a five-day course of ivermectin — 10 3mg pills — costs $0.53. (However, at today’s U.S. prices, 10 3mg pills cost about $39). Good luck trying to get it now! Molnupiravir Tmax - amount of time to get to maximum plasma Concentrations: 1-1.75 hours with a half life of 7 hours. You have to take 2 doses because of the half life. On effectiveness Ivermectin On effectiveness, Molnupiravir is lacking data. The only publicly available clinical data on Molnupiravir comes from a Merck press statement claiming the new drug is 50% effective against hospitalizations and deaths, when used as an early treatment. Molnupiravir Safety: Comparable safety information for Merck’s Molnupiravir is not yet available, as trials and studies are still ongoing. But Campbell did raise concern about Molnupiravir’s mutagenic properties. He cited the Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics paper which states, “there is some concern about the safety of [Molnupiravir’s] NHC-nucleoside triphosphate, which is mutagenic to mammalian cells.” Molnupiravir Cost of a complete five-day course of Molnupiravir is $700 — or $70 per pill. That amounts to a 4,000% markup over what it costs Merck to make the drug. In his latest video, John Campbell, Ph.D., compared ivermectin, whose use as a COVID treatment has been widely criticized by mainstream media, with Merck’s new COVID drug, Molnupiravir, which is garnering positive media coverage. By Jeremy Loffredo In his latest video, John Campbell, Ph.D., compared ivermectin, whose use as a COVID treatment has been widely criticized by mainstream media, with Merck’s new COVID drug, Molnupiravir, which has been the subject of glowing media attention. Campbell, a UK-based nurse teacher, cited several studies as he compared the two treatments on the basis of effectiveness, safety and cost. He first turned to a paper in the Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, “Drugs Shown to Inhibit SARS-Cov-2 in COVID-19 Disease: Comparative Basic and Clinical Pharmacology of Molnupiravir and Ivermectin.” The peer-reviewed paper refers to ivermectin as the most studied “repurposed” medication globally, and notes that it is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and “classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an ‘essential’ broad spectrum antiparasitic, antibiotic, and has demonstrated broad antiviral activity against RNA viruses, including HIV, Zika, MERS and coronavirus.” “And of course, ivermectin also won the Nobel Prize in 2015,” Campbell said. According to the paper, Campbell said, Molnupiravir — though still going through trials and safety testing — is believed to “work against seasonal and pandemic flu, MERS, coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2.” The paper’s author noted that Molnupiravir does not inhibit inflammation, whereas ivermectin does. How do the two drugs compare on cost? Ivermectin is exponentially cheaper than Merck’s new Molnupiraravir. The cost of a complete five-day course of Molnupiravir is $700 — or $70 per pill. That amounts to a 4,000% markup over what it costs Merck to make the drug. Citing 2013 prices provided by the WHO, Campbell said a five-day course of ivermectin — 10 3mg pills — costs $0.53. (However, at today’s U.S. prices, 10 3mg pills cost about $39). On effectiveness, Molnupiravir is lacking data. The only publicly available clinical data on Molnupiravir comes from a Merck press statement claiming the new drug is 50% effective against hospitalizations and deaths, when used as an early treatment. For ivermectin, using publicly available data, Campbell referred to one peer-reviewed study that pegs ivermectin’s effectiveness in early treatment at 62%, and an ongoing meta-analysis which shows ivermectin is 66% effective in early treatment and 86% effective as a prophylactic. Using VigiBase, a WHO database on pharmaceutical safety data, Campbell showed that out of 3.7 billion doses given of ivermectin there have been only 5,693 reports of adverse events — far fewer, according to Campbell, than the number of adverse event reports associated with amoxicillin and ibuprofen, both widely used and considered safe. Comparable safety information for Merck’s Molnupiravir is not yet available, as trials and studies are still ongoing. But Campbell did raise concern about Molnupiravir’s mutagenic properties. He cited the Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics paper which states, “there is some concern about the safety of [Molnupiravir’s] NHC-nucleoside triphosphate, which is mutagenic to mammalian cells.” According to Campbell, Merck denies this is a problem. But the paper suggests, at the very least,” it needs looking into,” Campbell said. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...-covid-molnupiravir-ivermectin/?itm_term=home
Just posted on Twitter on Oct, 7th from: Pierre Kory, M.D., M.P.A. Pulmonary and Critical Care Specialist President, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Pierre Kory Twitter: @PierreKory Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at http://flccc.net. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin' covid19criticalcare.com Home - FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance The 'I-MASK+ Prophylaxis and Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19' and the 'MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19' are physiologic-based combination treatment regimen created by... 10:11 PM · Oct 7, 2021·Twitter Web App
Well there goes science... “Just eight of the 33 Vermonters who died of Covid-19 in September were unvaccinated, the Vermont Department of Heath said Wednesday." No one knows reality...and because covid is politicized, you can’t believe anything. But what we can see is... the world is small enough to create a one world government, force vaccines and stop you from buying & selling. Covid 19 might not be final battle but it is precursor/practice for what is coming. But hey, we always wanted Jesus return. But we forget the-birth pains. God Bless all of you!
Ok…yes, I too would question these…. It’s sad that we now can’t trust some of the medications being prescribed any more…we actually do need to know what’s in them. There was a time when I would never question a medication….guess those days are over now too. Thank you HH.
I found ivermectin horse paste on Amazon. Of course, the prices have been raised lately. But it's available. I also saw where Amazon has ivermectin tablets!
