Which suggests, wearing a mask in public is no longer a show of vax or no-vax. Perhaps we all are best to weigh our personal reason(s) if we do or don't. I think I'll continue to weigh based on crowd or the business I walk inyo. My Dad has asked me to war one in stores. so I consider...for now.
I wear one at the grocery store. I have to wear one at the hospital where I belong to an exercise program and at Church. (Strongly urged) I scoffed at masks in the beginning. But I have researched this and I think they are effective at reducing viral load.
I'll wear in some stores, work (prayers please!), not at Church, indoors around certain nervous people. I suspect yes, it probably does reduce excessive viral exposure. I mean, isn't that the purpose? Not preventing but reducing?
I thought from official stats that the hospital and mortality rate was coming down and not as high as previous surge? I may have missed it in article but I don’t see link to official state data. I see a chart from Bloomberg which I’m assuming from sone data? https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/oth...us-illusion-of-a-defanged-pandemic/ar-AAO9jHq
The county next to us requires masks. So I comply. Here I wear one in the beauty salons and grocery stores. It is what it is.
https://nonvenipacem.com/2021/09/07/the-great-ivermectin-smear-campaign-of-2021/ The Great Ivermectin Smear Campaign of 2021 September 7, 2021 by Justus R. Hope, MD “In a normal year, the Kentucky Poison Control Center might receive one call from someone who has taken ivermectin, a drug commonly used to treat parasites in livestock. But amid increasing misinformation about the drug’s ability to both treat and prevent COVID-19, that number has increased to six this year.” This alarming news was published in Spectrum News – formerly known as Time Warner Cable – on August 24, 2021, and should be a lesson to every American. https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisv...ectin-calls-to-kentucky-poison-control-are-up The lesson is not about Ivermectin being poisonous because it isn’t, but about the pervasiveness of a type of new internet propaganda termed “informational flooding.” https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/12274299/Roberts_gsas.harvard_0084L_11469.pdf?sequence=1 In an even more “alarming” report, NPR wrote, “Minnesota’s Poison Control System is dealing with the same problem. According to the department, only one Ivermectin exposure case [telephone call] was reported in July, but in August, the figure jumped to nine.” https://www.npr.org/sections/corona...verdose-exposure-cases-poison-control-centers Are you kidding me? Nine telephone calls are enough to make the news? We have 2,213 deaths on August 26 from COVID-19, but these nine telephone calls are enough to make the headlines? We have a media blackout on how India used cheap Ivermectin to obliterate the Delta variant while we struggle unsuccessfully to sell the public on problematic yet profitable vaccines. https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout The CDC coordinates all 55 poison control centers across the nation, and they are closely aligned with the FDA, which we now know is captured by Big Pharma. more on this later. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537316/ Suddenly we see hundreds of articles on so-called “Ivermectin poisoning.” Indeed, we see more ARTICLES published than there were TELEPHONE CALLS in August on Ivermectin to poison control centers in the ENTIRE NATION. NPR reports that during the period January 1 to August 31, there were 1,143 Ivermectin telephone calls to poison control centers which works out to 143 calls per month. The Mississippi State Department of Health was careful to clarify that although telephone calls to poison control had increased, the vast majority of callers had only mild symptoms, and there were “no hospitalizations due to Ivermectin toxicity.” If you are still left wondering whether there might have been a tiny grain of truth in these articles, consider what was reported in Utah. This alarmist article is entitled, “The Utah Poison Control Center has seen a bump in calls about Ivermectin – which is not recommended for treating COVID-19.” However, inside the article, you will notice the false alarm. The Medical Director of Utah poison control is quoted as admitting that it was only “some small increase” in Ivermectin phone calls, and no one required hospitalization. https://www.sltrib.com/news/2021/08/30/utah-poison-control/ Yet for Utah alone, I counted at least twenty Ivermectin poison control articles, and for the nation, the count was well into the hundreds. At least one publication made the leap from exaggeration to fabrication. Rolling Stone Magazine published an interview with an Oklahoma osteopathic physician, Dr. Jason McElyea, who claimed that Northeastern Hospital System’s emergency departments were overrun with so many Ivermectin overdoses that gunshot victims were having difficulty getting treatment. Dr. McElyea stated, “The ERs are so backed up that gunshots victims were having a hard time getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated.” Multiple networks repeated the story, and it went viral. But the report turned out to be false. Rolling Stone was forced to publish a retraction of sorts, a correction to their report, wherein they stated the truth of the matter was the opposite. Northeastern Hospital System Sequoyah informed them that Dr. Jason McElyea, although affiliated with them, had not worked in the Sallisaw location in the last two months. Furthermore, in a statement issued September 5, 2021, Northeastern Hospital System Sequoyah reported that no patients had been treated for Ivermectin overdose. Indeed no patients were treated for any complications of taking Ivermectin – and no gunshot wound patients or otherwise had been turned away from seeking emergency care. It was all untrue. We were all lied to. https://www.foxnews.com/media/rolli...e-after-viral-hospital-ivermectin-story-false However, you can do your own research. For example, google the news on Ivermectin poisoning articles, and you will find almost all of them were published within the last few weeks. Nothing before then… Read the rest: https://www.thedesertreview.com/opi...cle_19b8f2a6-0f29-11ec-94c1-4725bf4978c6.html Sent from my iPhone
This is evil. I do not blame Australians for taking to the streets in protest, God bless them for standing up to this insanity.
Dr. Peter McCullough is no longer recommending you get vaccinated. We the People Convention.org Short video. He is fired up.
Anyone who votes for this insane man at election deserves to lose their liberty which seems to be already the case in Australia.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-gallagher-fauci-resign-wuhan-lies Rep. Gallagher demands Fauci resign, saying he 'lied to the American people' about Wuhan lab He said documents show Fauci's agency funded experiments that make coronavirus 'more pathogenetic' GEvidence contained in the pages prompted Rutgers molecular biologist Richard Ebright to describe White House COVID-19 advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci’s prior denial of U.S. funding of gain-of-function research as “untruthful.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/d...funding-of-coronavirus-research-at-wuhan-lab/
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3224747 Did the CDC change the definition of "vaccine"? 2,126 Views | 58 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by rab79 11:38a, 9/8/21 AG This is weird. Quote: Here's the "Definition of Terms" for Immunization as captured on August 26, 2021. I've highlighted the key points. Quote: Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected. Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose. Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation. Quote: Now, here's the "Definition of Terms" for Immunization now, which was updated on September 1, 2021, with changes highlighted. Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected. Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose. Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease. Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation. Quote: So, up until last week, a vaccine went from being something that "produces immunity to a specific disease" to something that merely "stimulates the body's immune response against diseases," and a vaccination no longer "produces immunity" to a disease, just "protection" from a disease. Does anyone else find this disturbing? Why did the CDC suddenly redefine "vaccine" and "vaccination" to make them sound similar to your basic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a prescription drug you have to keep taking regularly?Link
