Discussion in 'Pope Francis' started by local, Oct 19, 2015.
I smell a rat. Tell us your background and your true motivation. If you can.
He was wrong in the way he conducted his investigation. That is obvious and supported by the eveidence. Erroneous means wrong.
OK Richard, since you ignore EVERYTHING given to you, to educate you, I am done with you . I am also VERY sure SAINT Padre Pio is a better judge of the validityof this apparition ,than that bishop, and you. God bless you in your stubborn ignorance. Call me after the Warning hits you like a ton of bricks.
Under law a verbal contract, if substantiated by evidence, is as binding as a written contract. There seems to be reliable support for this papal blessing.
I wish I knew how to post those clever videos and cartoons that blue and mac did. I would post one of a rat in a trap.
Come on Glenn, don't act like that.
And, no, Saint Padre Pio IS NOT a better judge of the validity of this or any apparition than the local bishop. Saint Padre Pio would never subscribe to such an error.
The biggest joke of all is this Bishop who NEVER filed a written report to the Vatican. Hmmmm ,I guess if you have NO evidence to back up your lie, better not to send anything.
No, what you mean to say is that you disagree with his conclusions and therefore now find it necessary to attack his methods and his motives. What a mistake!
He didn't lie, Glenn. He conducted a sufficient investigation.
You have failed to address an earlier point I made: if the seers were convinced that they saw the Virgin, why did they recant in the presence of the bishop? The seers at Fatima were threatened with being boiled alive and yet did not recant? Don't sidestep this issue, Glenn.
Richard ,I distrust your motives here, you have now exposed yourself as NOT to be taken seriously here. NO ONE on earth can question the spiritual wisdom of Padre Pio. AND FYI, he was a HUGE supporter of this apparition and Conchita, and HE CHOSE HER ALONE TO RECIEVE 3 OF HIS PERSONAL ITEMS UPON HIS DEATH. Goodbye & God bless.
Glenn, you are acting silly. Saying that I am "NOT worthy of being here" (whatever that means) because I made the true statement that Padre Pio IS NOT the authority or the judge of Garabandal; the local bishop IS the authority on Garabandal and after the local bishop the bishop of Rome. Padre Pio has no authority or jurisdiction over the question of Garabandal and to suggest that he does is a gross error.
Not the Garabandal rumble on the forum again.......
In this corner we've got Glenn, The Garabandalist and in the corner Richard, The Questioner. This fruitless battle is set for 15 rounds. Round one, Richard throws a left-right question combination....Glenn counters with an ALL CAPS uppercut......
All in fun boys couldn't resist.
In other comment boxes they are usually referred to as "trolls" and not given any more attention.
You missed the knockout punch. Richard swung and hit himself ,and knocked himself out ( The Padre Pio comment was his undoing ). Get the stretcher. NEXT !
Thats what i thought but did not like to say. What a waste of time. Hard lesson. What a fool am I. But happy to be a fool for Truth. Happy to support Glenn and his wee Spanish friend. I know its not the best way to think but I hope the heavens take care of Richard in the way that the Mafia takes care of traitors.....well maybe not that harshly.
so funny MMM , even from a beagle face
or should I say, trololololol!
Everyone, lighten up, this in a forum not an inquisition.
Mmm 'inquisition' that may be an even better solution for you than the mafia. I will get in touch with them.
Separate names with a comma.