That's 1600 leaflets posted door to door I can do no more my feet are aching all I can ask of you now is some serious storming of heaven for a Holy and Blessed result in the voting on Thursday
God bless you John. Prayers. It was a terrible day for you to be out. Wind and rain, wind and rain, wind and rain.
Strange that this vote is happening on the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe too of all days, who put a stop to all of this sort of thing in South America.
Perhaps it is just coincidence, but issues to do with the sanctity of life often seem to happen around a time associated Our Lady. For instance in the south we had two referenda, the same-sex marriage referendum and abortion referendum and both of them were in the month of May, which is Our Lady's month. Perhaps it could be some form of attack on her.
Where Our Lady has won victory for God, by saving souls and laying a claim on a date, the evil one continually tries to counter claim. The evil ones spite for Our Lady has no bounds. Oh Mary conceived without sin pray for us who has recourse to Thee.
And for anyone that is confused on what way they should vote maybe they should read this Suppose a candidate came forward and said, “I support terrorism.” Would you say, “I disagree with you on terrorism, but what’s your health care plan?” Of course not. Rather, you would immediately consider that candidate as disqualified from public office. His position, allowing the killing of the public, is radically inconsistent with public service. So it is with abortion. Abortion is no less violent than terrorism. Any candidate who says abortion should be kept legal disqualifies him/herself from public service. We need look no further; we need pay no attention to what that candidate says on other issues. Support for abortion is enough for us to decide not to vote for such a person. Pope John Paul II put it this way: "Above all, the common outcry, which is justly made on behalf of human rights -- for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to family, to culture -- is false and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition for all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum determination" (Christifideles Laici, 1988). A call for human rights while claiming authority to take away the most basic right – life – from unborn children is “false and illusory” precisely because if government can take away rights from some humans, then those rights aren’t human rights at all. Such a politician, in other words, is saying that rights like health care only belong to some humans, not to others. If a politician cannot respect the life of a little baby, how is he or she supposed to respect yours?
