Not to belabor my defense of Dr. Graney's argument but I don't think the question of time of Jupiter within Virgo this time around was noticed so much since his concentration was upon the other part that was obvious to him as not necessarily limited to the number 12 at the head....regardless of what Jupiter's role in the whole being different this time around or not. IOW, he could have agree with that unusual aspect but it would still not change the other aspect that he was noting. You could always write to him and point out your concern about glossing over that other aspect of Jupiter's timing this time around. He could acknowledge that fact while still making the point about the "crown's" own left out facts that could negate the whole anyway for some. Anyway, the forum with the Vatican Observatory head I linked to is very good I found. Apparently to this expert all of the hype about the blood moons that people read everywhere was filled with misinformation! Perhaps a bit like the difference between a scientific outlook and a poetic outlook.