Jerusalem

Discussion in 'Positive Critique' started by padraig, May 1, 2026 at 8:13 PM.

  1. padraig

    padraig Powers

  2. padraig

    padraig Powers

  3. padraig

    padraig Powers

    I thought my head was going to explode when I saw that poor French nun attacked by that Jewish coward. I wish I had been there with a good solid blackthorn stick, he would not have been beating up any nuns again any time soon.
     
    Pax Prima, garabandal and Sanctus like this.
  4. Mario

    Mario Powers

    Such inhumane and hateful acts certainly don't correspond with the Gospel! We should come to the help of anyone in such a sorry situation! And then I think what my response would be if it were done to me?

    Matthew 5:38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to you, Do not resist one who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also."

    Lord, Your commands are not easy!:eek:
     
    Pax Prima and Mary's child like this.
  5. padraig

    padraig Powers

    https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/self-defense

    DEFENSE OF LIFE AND PERSON.—Everyone has the right to defend his life against the attacks of an unjust aggressor. For this end he may employ whatever force is necessary and even take the life of an unjust assailant. As bodily integrity is included in the good of life, it may be defended in the same way as life itself. It must be observed, however, that no more injury may be inflicted on the assailant than is necessary to defeat his purpose. If, for example, he can be driven off by a call for help or by inflicting a slight wound on him, he may not lawfully be slain. Again the unjust attack must be actually begun, at least morally speaking, not merely planned or intended for some future time or occasion. Generally speaking one is not bound to preserve one’s own life at the expense of the assailant’s; one may, out of charity, forego one’s right in the matter. Sometimes, however, one may be bound to defend one’s own life to the utmost on account of one’s duty of state or other obligations. The life of another person may be defended on the same conditions by us as our own. For since each person has the right to defend his life unjustly attacked what he can lawfully do through his own efforts he may also do through the agency of others. Sometimes, too, charity, natural affection, or official duty imposes the obligation of defending others. A father ought, for example, to defend the lives of his children; a husband, his wife; and all ought to defend the life of one whose death would be a serious loss to the community. Soldiers, policemen, and private guards hired for that purpose are bound in justice to safeguard the lives of those entrusted to them.

    [​IMG]
     
    Pax Prima, Mary's child and Mario like this.

Share This Page