New York Times 1923 noting that Old Glaciers have disappeared -- first noted in 1918 five years aerlier!!
GOING FURTHER BACK IN TIME TO 1817 A REPORT SHOWING THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS A CYCLICAL EVENT -- ARCTIC ICE MELT IN 1817 "It will without doubt have come to your Lordship's knowledge that a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly abated. (This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations." President of the Royal Society, London, to the Admiralty, 20th November, 1817
Climate change? Yes! Man made? Yes, via sin, not anything else. God sent his son into the world because of sin, not because of climate change. God created Adam and Eve in a perfect paradise where everything had perfect purpose, place and order. It was sin that changed that truth and it is sin against God commandments that will bring a climate change that man has not seen along with a horrible period with the Man of Sin. But we know the Era of Peace will come after this purification and that is what we must keep our eyes and hearts towards.
We await the time when the Lord Jesus will reconcile all things to Himself. No UN or NWO can do that. This is a fallen world.
I find it amusing that there is an EXPECTATION by some people in today's society that our climate should remain essentially static and unchanging. Seriously... these people are actually protesting the fact that the climate changes. The very notion of such the idea that it shouldn't change is ludicrous and is evidence of modern man's arrogant belief that he is in, or should be in, control of everything, including the weather. The climate is and ALWAYS has been unpredictable. At times, weather is volatile. That is how it's always been! As we all know, God at times punishes us through the weather. However, you won't hear that sentiment from any of the common folk who are caught up in the climate tailspin. All this climate change stuff is really just a rouse that is perpetuated by the devil to pull unsuspecting folks away from real, moral issues. May God bless us all.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/in-un...ization-slams-climate-extremists_3076409.html Head of Key Meteorological Organization Slams Climate Extremists, in Unprecedented Move By Ivan Pentchoukov September 10, 2019 Updated: September 13, 2019 Share The head of the world’s foremost weather science organization issued a surprise rebuke to climate alarmists in remarks published on Sept. 6, marking what may be, according to some experts, one of the most significant developments in the climate debate in decades. Petteri Taalas, the secretary-general of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), told the Talouselämä magazine in Finland that he disagrees with doomsday climate extremists who call for radical action to prevent a purported apocalypse. “Now, we should stay calm and ponder what is really the solution to this problem,” Taalas said. “It is not going to be the end of the world. The world is just becoming more challenging. In parts of the globe, living conditions are becoming worse, but people have survived in harsh conditions.” The remarks came as a “total surprise,” especially coming from Taalas, who has himself made alarmist statements about the climate, according to Benny Peiser, the director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation in London. “I think they’re beginning to realize that the whole agenda has been hijacked by extremists and undermining the economy and the social stability of European countries,” Peiser told The Epoch Times. Taalas said that establishment meteorological scientists are under increasing assault from radical climate alarmists, who are attempting to move the mainstream scientific community in a radical direction. He expressed specific concern with some of the solutions promoted by climate alarmists, including calls for couples to have no more children. “While climate skepticism has become less of an issue, we are being challenged from the other side. Climate experts have been attacked by these people and they claim that we should be much more radical. They are doomsters and extremists. They make threats,” Taalas said. “The latest idea is that children are a negative thing. I am worried for young mothers, who are already under much pressure. This will only add to their burden.” According to Myron Ebell, the chair of the Cooler Heads Coalition—an organization that challenges climate alarmism—Taalas’s remarks are significant because he heads the WMO. The WMO is one of the two organizations that founded the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988. Since being formed, the IPCC has become the leading institution worldwide to promote the theory that human activity contributes to global warming. “It’s a major international organization. It has a lot of credibility, and for the head of it to say that the alarmists have gone too far is important, or potentially important,” Ebell said. “We’ll have to see what the impact is and also what the blowback is,” he said. “Because, in the past, when people have stepped out of line in a more realistic or skeptical direction, the alarmist establishment has been pretty effective—and often in a very brutal way—in punishing or forcing people back into line.” While Taalas limited his examples in the climate debate to Finland, some of the extremism Ebell references is akin to the rhetoric employed by climate alarmists in the United States. Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has become one of the key faces of that movement. The New York congresswoman regularly promotes the theory that the world will enter an irreversible downward spiral toward apocalypse unless the United States takes radical action to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions in 12 years. The deadline that Ocasio-Cortez references comes from a special report by the IPCC, which states that “global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate.” The report concludes that risks of long-lasting or irreversible impact on the earth’s ecosystems are higher if warming breaches the 1.5-degree mark by 2030. Taalas pointed out that climate extremists are selectively picking out facts from the IPCC reports to fit their narrative. “The IPCC reports have been read in a similar way to the Bible: you try to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify your extreme views. This resembles religious extremism,” Taalas said. Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore called Taalas’s remarks the “biggest crack in the alarmist narrative for a long time.” “The meteorologists are real scientists and probably fed up with Greta, Mann, Gore, & AOC catastrophists. Good on him,” Moore wrote on Twitter on Sept. 7. AOC is the acronym commonly used to refer to Ocasio-Cortez. The three others named in the message are Michael Mann, a climatologist; Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old Swedish student; and former Vice President Al Gore. The vast majority of the climate models the IPCC uses as the basis for its predictions have incorrectly forecast higher temperatures repeatedly. According to an analysis by the Cato Institute, 105 of the 108 models predicted higher surface temperatures for the period between 1998 and 2014 than were actually recorded. The IPCC has previously admitted that climate models can’t be used to accurately predict long-term changes in the climate. “In sum, a strategy must recognise what is possible. In climate research and modeling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible,” the IPCC’s 2018 report states. Peiser said he sent Taalas’s comments to a list of 5,000 media contacts, but none have picked up the story. Peiser’s nonprofit posted the first translation of the comments, some of which were adopted for this article after verification. “I think people are utterly shocked by the language that he is using,” Peiser said. “He talks about a religious cult. He talks about people being extremists and doomsters. It’s quite staggering. The language that he uses and the signal that he’s sending out is ‘We are afraid of these extremists. They are destroying our society.’”
Eating meat is a crime against humanity and should be BANNED, says top barrister Michael Mansfield as he calls for new offence of 'ecocide' Left-wing lawyer Michael Mansfield says eating meat could become illegal Self-styled 'radical lawyer' Mr Mansfield is due to call for a crime of ‘ecocide’ He will speak at the launch of a vegan campaign at the Labour Party conference https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...at-crime-against-humanity-banned-says-QC.html
So much for veganism being another lifestyle 'choice'. These lunatics will attempt to mandate it. I have a suspicion that this might be a rock the Bolsheviks will perish on-people will take a lot, but forced semi-starvation might wake up even the most sheep-like. One must make allowances for these misfortunates; in self-inflicted semi-starvation, the organ most vulnerable to the consequent nutritional deficiencies is the seat of the intellect. Corbyn's Bolshevism is being fully unmasked, now. The Labour party is also proposing as policy the uncompensated appropriation of private property in the abolition of the private education system (of course, Corbyn himself received a private education). Like all socialists, their true motivation is envy and their solution goes nowhere beyond the equal distribution of misery. This is all of a piece with their adoption of extremist mandatory veganism, as these puritans, in their luciferian frenzies, can not bear for a moment even the thought of legitimate enjoyment of God's fruits. The Labour Party intends to ban almost everything. I think we should consider banning the legal profession and leave it at that. I think we'd be pleasantly surprised at the results.
The Greeks were aware of that 25 centuries ago. We seem to have conveniently forgotten it. Ever wonder why Greenland was named "Greenland" when the vikings arrived? This from a National Geographic article: Ice core and mollusk shell data suggests that from A.D. 800 to 1300, southern Greenland was much warmer than it is today. This means that when the Vikings first arrived, the Greenland name would make sense. But by the 14th century, maximum summer temperatures in Greenland had dropped. Lower temperatures meant fewer crops and more sea ice, forcing the local Norse population to abandon their colonies. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/06/iceland-greenland-name-swap/
I'm hoping for a bit of global warming so that we in Ireland might actually need AC! If I got steak only once a week, I'd think I was a vegan.
I spent all Saturday on cousins farm vaccinating black Angus cows which was a nightmare in dealing with corralling them and getting the task done. I have never wanted to eat steak more in my entire life after that ordeal lol.
