Evil Empire or Russia Consecrated?

Discussion in 'The Signs of the Times' started by Richard67, Nov 18, 2014.

  1. Richard67

    Richard67 Powers

    The founders of Communism were not Christians, they were mostly of Jewish heritage (saying so might get you branded an anti-Semite and thrown in jail in parts of Europe today).

    Although the founders of Communism (as well as Zionism) were of Jewish heritage, they were mostly atheists and not followers of the Law of Moses. For example, with the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917 were Jewish: Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), head of the Russian Red Army and chief of Soviet foreign affairs; Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon), Bolshevik party's executive secretary and chairman of the Central Executive Committee; Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky), head of the Comintern, the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries; Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), press commissar; Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), foreign affairs commissar. Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church. Lenin was actually a Jewish-supremacist who viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties - especially the Christian Russia which he was overthrowing - with contempt. He actually hated ethnic Russians: "An intelligent Russian," he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."

    Confirmation of the role played by atheistic Jews in the founding of Bolshevism and Communism, comes from none other than Winston Churchill, who warned of it at the time in an article published in the February 8, 1920 issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald . In that article, Churchill wrote that Bolshevism "is a worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization." He went on to describe its orgins:

    "There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people."​

    As for the Jewish origins of Freemasonry, Saint Maximillian Kolbe wrote some excellent essays on this subject. Had Saint Maximillian Kolbe been alive today, his writings would have branded him an anti-Semite and he would have probably been thrown in prison.

    Of course, Putin understands the origins of Communism better than anyone else. Putin comes from the "White-Russian" (anit-Communist) tradition. They were defeated in 1917 and their Czar and his family was brutally tortured and murdered. But they were not totally eradicated. They bided their time and when the time was right Putin and Russian patriots loyal to him took control back (sometimes forcefully) from the Soviets and Bolsheviks who had ruined Russia. The reason the West can't understand how a seeming nobody - a mere KGB officer - could retake control of Russia and maintain that power for so long, is because they don't understand (or ignore) Russian history. They think that the majority of Russians in 1917 supported the violent overthrow of their country. Wrong. They think that Russia was inherently a nation based on atheistic, Jewish Bolshevism. Wrong. They also think that Russians are the type of people that will simply bow down and submit when their nation is violently overthrow by revolutionaries. Wrong. The dangerous part for us today is that the descendants of the violent revolutionaries of 1917, are now firmly in control of the West. They used the same "color revolution" and "protest" tactics that were so successful in 1917 to overthrow Ukraine. Putin knows they will overthrow Russia again today using the same tactics used in 1917, if they are given the chance. He'll never give them that chance and he will oppose their agenda abroad, so the conflict will continue.

    Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!
    josephite, Solanus., Dolours and 2 others like this.
  2. jackzokay

    jackzokay Archangels

    It is very difficult to ignore or refute your points. These points are rational and logical. I do not understand how many Americans expect a leader, in this instance - Putin, to simply wave a magic wand and make things as they would have them.

    A leader has in his own country the equivalent of the right & the left to deal with. He has hardliners to deal with. He must bring along dissenters etc etc., if he ignores these factors - he becomes a dictator. And that is before he even begins to factor the economy and the economic considerations of his country and of his people!

    It is pompous in the extreme to criticise one man for failing to oversee such encompassing change. - Particularly so given that Russia has been entrenched for more than a century.

    Why hasnt Trump reversed abortion yet, for example? One could argue that he presides over murder daily?

    I am not a 'Putin lover'. Nor a 'Trump hater'. I just hope and pray both can and will illicit holy, positive change.

    The splinter and the plank comment by our saviour, comes to mind - as many Americans pompously make these high and mighty demands of Putin. Yet ignore the failings of their own leader...
  3. jackzokay

    jackzokay Archangels

    Freedom of press? Where is this freedom of press you speak of? Do you wish Russia to have the same freedom of press as we have here in the West?

    In case you hasn't noticed our press; with their 'freedom' convinced us to back a phoney war in Iraq. The free press recurrently tell us abortion is a right and that the Catholic is to blame for All the worlds ills.
    Is that the freedom of press you hope Putin will introduce?
    Byron likes this.
  4. Fatima

    Fatima Powers

    jacksokay, you need to stop reading the liberal press papers and TV news. In American we still have both, its up to you which you want to believe. Russia only has one press, Putin's controlled press.
  5. jackzokay

    jackzokay Archangels

    We'll have to disagree on that, Fatima.
    The mass media are controlled by a few. As such; they get to make the news. They push an agenda that suits their ideals.
    This was emphasised pointedly by Mrs Trump when she stated that if it wasn't for Twitter; her husband would never have made President. As he was able to overcome much of the nonsense thst was wrote in the press about him.
    Byron and AED like this.
  6. AED

    AED Powers

    I hope you are right Richard. I sincerely hope you are right.
  7. AED

    AED Powers

    The press and media except for independent alt-press outlets is bought and paid for—Western Pravda. I avoid it unless absolutely necessary.
    Byron and Richard67 like this.
  8. Fatima

    Fatima Powers

    If it was not for Fox News President Trump would not have been elected and the most serious scandal's being unveiled in the FBI, Obama administration, Hillary's corrupt felony scandals and the truth of what is happening in the US would never have come to light. Perfect, no, but as good and better than most in the world today.
    Booklady and AED like this.
  9. jackzokay

    jackzokay Archangels

    It is never, ever a good thing for the 'MASS' media to be controlled by a few. To think that this is a good thing is simply ridiculous.

    How many convictions have resulted from the above examples that you have cited?

    Mrs Trump referred to Twitter as the primary media mechanism that got her husband elected, not Fox news.

    Why aren't elements of this free press pushing for an end to abortion?
    Why does a massive story like the exposing of planned parenthood and it's selling baby parts go relatively unreported? ...when clearly this is a story that is up there with the top stories THIS CENTURY!

    There are numerous examples of the press and its selectivity.

    YouTube and Google are awash with examples. Take a look.

    And heaven has often lamented the media and its corruptness...
    Byron and Richard67 like this.
  10. Richard67

    Richard67 Powers

    The big media outlets here in America - ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, FOX etc. - have never been truly independent. Their cozy relationship with the CIA goes way back, all the way back to the 1950’s in fact. The CIA ran a program called “Operation Mockingbird”:

    Operation Mockingbird was established by Frank Wisner, director of the Office of Policy Coordination, a covert operations unit created by the United States National Security Council. Davis writes that Mockingbird was a response to the creation of a Communist front organization, the International Organization of Journalists, which "received money from Moscow and controlled reporters on every major newspaper in Europe, disseminating stories that promoted the Communist cause."[2]

    Wisner recruited Phil Graham from The Washington Post to run the project within the industry. According to Davis, "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles."[3]

    In 1951, Allen Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird's "principal operative."[4]

    After 1953, the media network was overseen by CIA Director Allen Dulles, by which time Operation Mockingbird had major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies.[5] Its usual modus operandi was to place reports, developed from CIA-provided intelligence, with cooperating or unwitting reporters. Those reports would be repeated or cited by the recipient reporters and would then, in turn, be cited throughout the media wire services. These networks were run by people with well-known liberal, but pro-American-big-business and anti-Soviet views, such as William S. Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time and Life), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (The New York Times), Alfred Friendly(managing editor of The Washington Post), Jerry O'Leary (The Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham, Sr. (Louisville Courier-Journal), James S. Copley (Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (The Christian Science Monitor)...

    ...The most extensive discussion of CIA relations with news media from these investigations is in the Church Committee's final report, published in April 1976. The report covered CIA ties with both foreign and domestic news media.

    For foreign news media, the report concluded that:

    The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.[7]​

    For domestic media, the report states:

    Approximately 50 of the [Agency] assets are individual American journalists or employees of U.S. media organizations. Of these, fewer than half are "accredited" by U.S. media organizations ... The remaining individuals are non-accredited freelance contributors and media representatives abroad ... More than a dozen United States news organizations and commercial publishing houses formerly provided cover for CIA agents abroad. A few of these organizations were unaware that they provided this cover.[7] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    Don_D, jackzokay, AED and 1 other person like this.
  11. Richard67

    Richard67 Powers

    I wouldn’t credit FOX so much as the alternative media, especially on the internet. But by far Trump’s most effective tool his rallies, much more so than even Twitter. And don’t forget the Debates. I have always felt that most voters make their minds up during the debates, and Trump stole the show in all of them.
    Don_D, AED and Byron like this.
  12. Richard67

    Richard67 Powers

    Amid all the anti-Russian hysteria that dominates the Fake News Media on a daily basis, it was refreshing to see a very good interview of RT’s editor Margarita Simonyan on 60 minutes. Mrs. Simonyan presents the Russian side of the story and explains that relations with the West really started to go sour when Clinton bombed the Christians of Serbia. Very important interview:

    jackzokay, AED and Byron like this.
  13. Dolours

    Dolours Powers

    My interest is the Catholic Church and how we got to the position we are in where the Church, having been almost eradicated from its birthplace, is on the verge of suffering a similar fate in Europe where it flourished for centuries.

    I haven't had time to read the rest of those letters of Moses Hess. I'm conscious of the dangers of a little knowledge. Checking out the links of who and what ideologies influenced the liked of Hess and Engels, the most important lesson I'm learning is the extent of my own ignorance. Ignorance of the enormous challenges our Church has faced down the centuries and ignorance of the people and thought process influencing many of those challenges. Checking out Marx and Engels led me to Moses Hess who in turn led me to Spinoza. References to the "Protestant Aquinas" Hagel pops up a lot.

    Spinoza, who appears to have heavily influenced Hess and others, had a strange concept of God. The God they believed in (if they believed in a God) wasn't our one true God who loves us and wants us to have a loving, personal relationship with Him. Their God is remote and only to be found in man when man evolves to be so enlightened that he becomes God. At least that's the impression I'm getting. If Freemasonry is an organisation based on their beliefs, I'm relieved that it is the polar opposite of what Pope Francis appears to believe. What worries me is that their God is changeable with the times which brings to mind some statements from the likes of Fr. James Martin and Bishops favoured by Pope Francis.

    I need to step up my prayer life, not least to the Holy Spirit.
    AED, Byron and CathyG like this.
  14. Byron

    Byron Powers

    Humanism. Man becomes a God. That is what communism and freemasonry is all about.
    Don_D and Booklady like this.
  15. Dolours

    Dolours Powers

    Yes, this appears to be the case, and it appears to have gained a firm foothold in the Catholic Church with some of the current movers and shakers intimating that humanism is compatible with Catholicism.

    Moses Hess and Spinoza were Jews who appear to have rejected the Jewish faith or twisted it into a reflection of what they considered to be a more suitable Judaism. Spinoza was excommunicated by his Synagogue for his (lack of) belief. There are suggestions that the Synagogue did this at the behest of the powerful Dutch Calvinists. The overall impression I get is that these heretical/apostate Jews were very welcome in "Reformed" European countries until what they were teaching threatened the power of the Protestant elite. What had been ok in Catholic France or Orthodox Russia wasn't ok in Protestant Germany or Holland. That the Dutch later warmed to Spinoza and Holland became probably the most atheistic country in Western Europe says as much about the shortsightedness of the Reformers and their followers as it does about Spinoza himself.

    So, are the likes of Soros, Bill Gates, media moguls and the crowd controlling Hollywood today's version of the people named by Churchill as quoted in Richard's post above? Is there some sort of plot that one country or pan-national organisation will have complete control over the world with that country/organisation being controlled by these Zionists? I hope that asking these questions doesn't put me in some anti-Semitic, far-right or fascist hater category and have our little forum listed as fake news promoters to be banned from the internet. Seems far-fetched but the way the world is panning out, I suppose it is possible.
    Don_D, Booklady and Byron like this.
  16. Byron

    Byron Powers

    You're not anti Semitic. This is the plan. This is what's behind the mystery of iniquity. They are preparing the coming of the Antichrist as a person. He will be a mix of all the forces in history which opposed Christ.
    Don_D and Dolours like this.
  17. earthtoangels

    earthtoangels Powers

    NATO intercepts Russian jet 'HIDING from radar to stop air DISASTER over Europe'

    The Russian jet flew towards Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania along the Baltic Coast, before being intercepted by the Danish jets over international waters.

    The F-16 fighter jets were launched from Šiauliai Air Base, Lithuania, to track and identify the plane, a Russian fighter jet whose exact model has not been named.

    NATO has accused the Russian jet of flouting air traffic rules by not activating its transponder – a device used to assist identifying aircraft on radar.

    Military aircraft that do not activate their transponders they risk collisions with passenger planes as they do not appear on civilian radars, NATO said in a statement released today.

    Russia’s ministry of defence in Moscow is yet to comment on the potentially disasterous flight.


    In a statement, NATO said: "When aircraft are flying with their transponders off, and when they are not in contact with civilian Air Traffic Control they cause a risk to other air traffic because they do not feature on civilian radar systems.

    "This is when NATO launches one of their Quick Reaction Alert interceptor planes.

    "The NATO jets fly close to the unidentified plane and their transponder signal is picked up by the air controllers allowing them to take measures to prevent mishaps with civilian airliners."

    In 2015 a Russian military aircraft that turned off its transponders nearly collided with a passenger jet over Sweden.

  18. Richard67

    Richard67 Powers

    From Russia’s Interfax News. Looks like things are heating up. Prayers for the brave Russian pilot:




    Russia's Su-25 downed with MANPADS in Syria, pilot dies fighting terrorists - Defense Ministry


  19. Don_D

    Don_D ¡Viva Cristo Rey!

    Ugh. Thanks Richard, I had not heard this news yet. It is exactly what I think we can expect with so many military assets in such a small space and not in agreement with one another.
  20. Byron

    Byron Powers


Share This Page