BREAKING: Pope Francis reportedly set to ask Bishop Strickland to resign!

Discussion in 'Church Critique' started by sparrow, Sep 12, 2023.

Tags:
  1. padraig

    padraig Powers

    The Pope of Mercy, listening and accompaniment.

    Yeah, right.
     
    DeGaulle and Mary's child like this.
  2. sparrow

    sparrow Powers

    Just found out via Return To Tradition.. how very sad, but a sign of the times for sure. This is huge and cannot be ignored by the faithful but quiet priests who are lying low for now can it? I certainly hope there is an uproar in the ranks. Waiting to hear from Fr Mark Goring and AB Vigano...
     
    Booklady, Byron, Michael_Pio and 7 others like this.
  3. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

  4. PurpleFlower

    PurpleFlower Powers

    Yes, it is a painful blow. I'm moving in to my house in his (former) diocese as I type this. It's an even bigger blow for the Catholic community being built right now north of Tyler. He was their spiritual father and a huge support in their endeavors. I'm honestly very nervous about whom Pope Francis will send as our new bishop. May God's Will be done.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2023
  5. Heidi

    Heidi Powers

    My husband just said that Bishop Strickland gave a speech on Halloween in Rome in which he said that Pope Francis removed the true pope and usurped his role for himself…..effectively saying that Pope Francis is not the real pope. If this is true, it is probably why he was removed.

    Has anyone else seen anything about this?
     
    DeGaulle, AED, BrianK and 1 other person like this.
  6. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

    But if he doesn’t believe Francis is the true Pope then why would he step down? It just seems implausible that he said that publicly.
     
  7. HeavenlyHosts

    HeavenlyHosts Powers

    I agree, it seems implausible.
     
  8. Heidi

    Heidi Powers

    Yes, it doesn’t make sense based on his previous statements. I am trying to find the source.
     
  9. Heidi

    Heidi Powers

    Michael_Pio, sparrow and Mary's child like this.
  10. Mario

    Mario Powers

    The relevant quote from Bishop Strickland's speech:

    It is easy to assert that no real damage has been done by the Synod. But it has done untold damage and attempting to cheapen what Christ proclaimed was worth His life, and for which He indeed shed His precious Blood. Would you now allow this one who has pushed aside the true Pope and has attempted to sit on a chair that is not his define what the Church is to be?

    The bold highlight appears to be speaking of Pope Francis.

    O Mary conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee!
     
    Byron, Michael_Pio, sparrow and 4 others like this.
  11. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

  12. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

    https://www.barnhardt.biz/2023/11/1...ut-up-stoopid-people-so-intransigently-desir/

    A question that needs to be asked: Why are these “Fwanciss is definitely the Pope and there’s nothing anyone can do about it so shut up, Stoopid” people so intransigently desirous for the Bergoglian Antipapacy to continue?
    Ann BarnhardtNovember 11, ARSH 2023
    Antipope Bergoglio just announced his completely illigetimate, illegal attempted deposition of Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas. Sadly, +Strickland will probably fold and go along with this illegal act by the Antipope and his Antichurch currently occupying the Vatican. That’s what’s so sickening about this whole thing. Every scrap of power that Antipope Bergoglio wields is due 100% to the sheep handing him the power. Bergoglio wields ZERO legitimate power in the Catholic Church. Everything he says and does is built on a foundation of Luciferian deception. And our culture is so far gone that it is now a sick, inverted “virtue” to surrender to evil. Anything- ANYTHING other than any sort of virility. Oh no. Acting like a man, much less a Catholic man, is THE unforgivable sin.

    Antipope Bergoglio is also getting ready to guarantee that all future “conclaves” are invalid by tricking the Church into thinking that the governing rules have been abrogated, and that “conclaves” include laywomen and various moral degenerates appointed by the Antipope himself. Again, the pathological incapacity of people to think in a linear progression (Bergoglio is not and never has been the Pope, and therefore has ZERO ability to abrogate or change ANYTHING) is being wielded by Satan as a relentless cudgel.

    AND, of course, we have the Antipope and his sodomite child-groomer ghostwriter, Tucho Fernandez, giving the green light to having transvestites be baptized under their drag stage names, to stand as godparents, and for open sodomites to have children they have bought from human traffickers (called “adoption”) be baptized. There is already approval from Bergoglio and Fernandez for “blessings” for sodomites, and it is suspected that some sort of Luciferian sodomitical “marriage rite” will be rolled out next year.

    Honest men, like Deacon Nick Donnelly of late, have started publicly acknowledging that Bergoglio obviously isn’t the Pope.

    But what I want to draw everyone’s attention to are these people, who with each new egregious act of Antipope Bergoglio, triple, quadruple and quintuple down on the lie that “Fwanciss is DEFINITELY Pope, there have been lots of bad popes before, and there’s absolutely nothing ANYONE can do about this – in fact, it will probably take many decades if not centuries for any of this to be fixed, so shut up, Stoopid!”

    The question is this: these people clearly WANT the LIE of Bergoglio being the Pope to be “true”, and to continue, even after Bergoglio dies. Why??? Why would you DEMAND not only that this continue, but that it cannot be fixed in our lifetimes? WHY?

    When people like me, NonVeniMark, Dr. Mazza, and the growing number of others step forward and say, “Hey, there has been a HUGE mistake here, let me show you what happened, and this COULD be fixed, and fixed quickly and shockingly easily,” these people fly into a rage at the thought of the Bergoglian Antipapacy being ended and publicly nullified. I’m talking fill-blown spittle-flecked nuttys, folks.

    Again… WHY?

    There are a few of these actors who are running red flags so high up the flagpole that it can’t be ignored. Lots of others are just scared of losing money, careers, etc. But there are a few who have even me scratching my chin and saying, “Whose payroll are these people on?”

    Langley (CIA)? Foggy Bottom (State Department)? Davos?

    [​IMG]



    Sent from my iPhone
     
    DeGaulle likes this.
  13. Heidi

    Heidi Powers

    Booklady, Byron, Michael_Pio and 5 others like this.
  14. AED

    AED Powers

    Me too. Immensely confused. The dubia Cardinals MUST step up.
     
  15. DeGaulle

    DeGaulle Powers

    I don't agree with Barnhardt's view that BerGOGlio wasn't properly elected, but her point seems to be that if this pope has so obviously and so deeply plunged into heresy and anti-Christianity, which it seems hard to deny, he has removed himself from the position.
     
    sparrow, AED and Mary's child like this.
  16. Mario

    Mario Powers

    I have to take back my highlight above. The whole quote is confusing, if not nonsensical. Pope Benedict chose to resign. Pope Francis was not in the picture until the conclave. So who did the pushing aside? I'm confused.:unsure:
     
    Booklady, Byron, sparrow and 4 others like this.
  17. DeGaulle

    DeGaulle Powers

    A poster on Father Z suggested that Catholics in that diocese put IOU's in the collections, with the accompanying written proviso that the matching cash be forthcoming upon Bishop Strickland's reinstatement.
     
    Sam, Jason Fernando, sparrow and 5 others like this.
  18. DeGaulle

    DeGaulle Powers

    There have been suggestions that Pope Benedict felt he had little option but to resign. It would be interesting to know the precise circumstances that led to his resignation.

    One would like to know, if intimidation was shown to have happened, whether or not the sodomite faction had any role.
     
    Michael_Pio, sparrow, AED and 4 others like this.
  19. Mario

    Mario Powers

    Thanks, DeGaulle. I still find some confusion in what the good bishop was sharing. He has said before that he usually speaks off the cuff and does not have his speeches prepared ahead of time. Anyway, it matters little. The hammer has fallen.

    Lord have Mercy!
     
  20. HeavenlyHosts

    HeavenlyHosts Powers

    This is my point exactly. The letter from Bp Strickland’s friend did nothing to clarify the situation. DeGaulle, you are right. We still do not know what the truth is about this issue. Nothing from the hierarchy, directly. Cardinal Burke is a canon lawyer. I am wondering how he will respond.
     

Share This Page