This seems a reasonable summary of the emerging state-of-play: https://www.unz.com/article/three-hours-in-the-kremlin/ Larry C. Johnson has been very accurate on this subject from the beginning. As he says, Netanyahu is caretaker for the next six weeks and will do everything in his power to prevent peace from breaking out. Creating the false impression that Iran is an escalating aggressor is not unexpected. Isn’t Netanyahu’s claim of ‘outside interference’ in the Israeli election a perfect example of chutzpah? Let us all pray that the dogs of war do not get their way.
I know it does not sound very likely that Iran would turn all out aggressive. So far she has been pretty passive/ defensive. But I have been following some military commentators that I trust. These gentlemen are by no means pro Zionist in fact they greatly dislike Israel. But they were saying that at some point Iran could turn very hostile. One or two even suggest Iran might have gotten its hands on some kind of nuke. I know this might sound fantastic but Catholic prophecy suggest Islam will invade Europe. The centre of this invasion would always be, I think Iran. Also if a new Islamic Messiah comes I am pretty sure it will be from Iran. I think the new Holy War will come from there. There are many militarists in Iran. Anyway just a thought. I wouldn't write off Iran for pulling some extreme moves. https://onepeterfive.com/what-did-the-saints-say-about-islam/ “On the other hand, those who founded sects committed to erroneous doctrines proceeded in a way that is opposite to this, the point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants.” -St. Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274), Theologian and Doctor of the Church. Quoted from his De Rationibus Fidei Contra Saracenos, Graecos, et Armenos and translated from Fr. Damian Fehlner’s Aquinas on Reasons for the Faith: Against the Muslims, Greeks, and Armenians (Franciscans of the Immaculate. 2002.).
There are no innocents in this situation, but it’s difficult to see how Iran would benefit from such an attack at the present time. Netanyahu would love to have us all believe it, giving him another pretext for attacking Iran, yet again. I’ve always thought that an Islamic attack on Europe would be internally via civil war in the main cities and externally from Turkey, with other Sunni countries rowing in. Certainly, Iran has now got the missile capability, but historically, Shia Islam has not tended to be as aggressive as the Sunni variant. All the terrorism seems to be Sunni-sourced. The Iranian allies, Hezbollah and the Yemenis seem to engage in conventional warfare. Hamas has a history of terrorism, but it is an exception, being originally spawned from the Muslim Brotherhood and consisting mostly of Sunni Arabs. Iran does support them, but who can deny that the Palestinians need support?
If Trump nukes them everything could change in an instant, not only as far as Iran is concerned but all of Islam.
If Trump decided to go down that road, he would truly be opening the Gates of Hell. Those taunts about him being ‘Hitler’ would be shown to be prophetic. In the face of such an atrocity, it would be hard to blame the Muslims for rising up. The Pakistanis have nukes. There are nukes on Turkish soil. The Israelis have them. The Indians have them and are closely allied to Israel. I’d be unsurprised if the Iranians have them by now. The Israelis have their Samson ‘doctrine’ if they’re badly hit. Hundreds of millions could die quickly…and they’d be the lucky ones. The new man likely to take over Israel seems more reasonable than Netanyahu, if he can only get there before Netanyahu restarts the war. He’s a former head of the IDF-military men are usually less warlike than civilian politicians and he is reported as favouring a combination of military strength and diplomacy. The Israelis are also likely aware that they are losing support in the US, particularly among ordinary American Jews. It seems that 60% of Jewish voters voted for one of the Muslim candidates. If we can avoid blowing the world up before Netanyahu goes, the Israelis might realise that they have to change tack. If they lose support in the US, they will not be able to maintain their genocides and their quest for ‘Greater Israel’.
I think Catholic Prophecy does not speak of all out nuclear war. It suggests the use of tactical nukes rather than strategic, kind of like nuclear artillery. The kind Trump seems to want to use on Pickaxe Mountain. I think the fire that falls from the sky will not be nukes. It will be directly from heaven, the same thing as Sodom and Gommorah.
I don't see Trump using a nuke for the fact that if he did there would be so much more turmoil on the home front. What I do see is a lot of manipulation and exploitation of the common person for politics. For example, diesel prices were artificially bumped up before the mid terms and immediately lowered them after. Making it out to be the war in Iran being entirely responsible, when it was in reality being further exploited for politics. The other thing is that Haiti is getting cleaned up. Before we were told it was impossible. Clearly it was just a money laundering racket which exploited the good will of people. Billions poured in and nothing done, meanwhile all that was needed was to clear out the criminals. Criminals who likely are in on the grift too. Haitians are celebrating. Now translate that into war.
I believe Epstein was a Mossad Op and Trump is being blackmailed by Netanyu because he was caught doing something truly horrible. That's why he attacked Iran in the first place. I also believe that many close to him including his own family are Mossad. I think that's why he will use the nuke. Israel is ordering him too. But it's just a guess.
You could be right, it's guess work on my part too. If Trump was to use a nuke on Iran, it would be the end of the US protecting Israel for certain though. Israel would seal it's own demise. Democrats would get all three branches of government, enable communism, likely persecute Jews and Christians. Stop protecting Israel. In some ways it seems like the US could be the restrainer.
I believe many of the people in charge in Israel at the moment are fully possessed by Satan. It was the same thing in Nazi Germany and Communist China/ Russia. The devils don't care about Israel's interest, they just want wars. I suspect Netanayu and others are insane with evil. I also believe The Mossad itself is Satanic. North Korea is another good example. Haiti another. The Black Synagogue. As to the State of Israel itself, it seems to have passed under some Dark Cloud of collective darkness. https://www.haaretz.com/life/2022-1...ke-faust/00000185-247e-dcb5-abe7-eefe15c60000
Them being insane with evil is a good point. As in they have fully reprobate minds. I saw a post talking about some scam center and the only reason they all were able to do it was for all the cocaine they were taking. It was the only way to shut down their consciences. Zelensky is alleged to be a big cocaine fiend. I kind of wonder. And it's like, can a person with a fully reprobate mind even make a good choice? As in, even if it is in their own benefit. If they are possessed then that is something else all together.
A darkened intellect ( and mortal sin darkens the intellect) does not have clarity of mind or good discernment. They have little sense of doing wrong. They think they are justified in their choices. Those who support abortion are a case in point.
