People Will Start Dying in March

It’s surprising how many people are signing up for this. Especially when they’ve had already had a bad experience with the first dose and go for the second.

 

Very shocking.

 

They did release that they could not say whether it affected reproductive organs. I read that in November I believe.

From what I understand these vaccines do not prevent you from getting the virus. I can't remember where I read that. They apparently just lower the symptoms and people who do get the vaccines and get the virus will still be contagious and thus masks have be warn.. this is insane!

 

But there are reports that some young people don't fully recover from the virus and develop serious medical problems that could affect them for the rest of their lives.

There was a discussion on another thread about Dr. Cahill's concerns. Someone there, I think it was Heidi, said that Dr. Cahill's fears are based on her knowledge of a previous SARS vaccine but that the current vaccine doesn't have those issues because the makers identified the cause of the problem and fixed it. I think that's what Heidi explained and I hope she will correct me if I misunderstood.

someone else posted a video on that thread. The message from the video seemed to be that nobody really knows what's in the vaccine because the makers don't have to disclose the ingredients. If that's the case, then only the vaccine makers know whether or not the previous problems have been eliminated. It is possible that I also misunderstood the information in that video.

Now, a sceptic might suspect that there's something very suspicious about a vaccine being pushed on the public in totalitarian style with zero tolerance for doubts or questions. On the other hand, a sceptic might also wonder whether Dr. Cahill's motives are completely about concern for public safety. In one of the videos she expressed a wish, or at least an interest, in knowing the make-up ofmthe vaccine (I hope I'm not misrepresenting what she said but that's how I understood it). A very sceptical person might ask whether Dr. Cahill wants that much detail about the vaccine out of self interest or innthe interests of a rival company rather than out of concern for the public. I'm just being a devil's advocate here - Dr. Cahill seems genuine to me and raises questions that deserve answers.

 

They don't prevent you getting the virus. In fact, I heard this week of someone who contracted the virus after being vaccinated, had extremely mild symptoms but went on to infect a family member who became very ill. They don't stop you getting the virus because, unlike normal vaccines, they don't inject a small dose of the virus into your system. What they do is inject some kind of protein or other substance that makes the body produce fighting cells against the virus should you be infected. It sounds like they add something to the immune system. I'm sure you can tell from this post that I have zero medical knowledge, so don't take that as an informed opinion. The case of the person contracting the virus after being vaccinated is something I learned from a most reliable source who is very supportive of the vaccine.

 

Why would she?

Where does her , 'Self interest', lie ?

You've lost me.

,,and I have no idea why a previous vaccine would not be relevant?

 

I remember hearing something similar about whooping cough when there was a resurgence years ago... they weren’t sure if being vaccinated against it meant that you could be an asymptotic carrier or not.

 

I admit I am more than a little out of my depth in all this.

 

I think one mistake I make, spiritually, is worrying about this too much.

But then again, in ,my own defense, I am not worried for myself. I do not fear death, in fact I rather look forward to it.

But I am concerned for others....that they might have long and good lives...

..as for myself I would be happy enough more then happy enough to go...
My bags are very well packed, as Pope John xiii commented when he got his cancer diagnosis years ago



Bless him. My favourite Pope..

 

I watched the video and my gut feeling is wait until next year. I will take my vitamins and say my prayers. We are in unchartered waters here. What I found most disturbing in Profs Cahill's talk was her claim that the vaccine causes one to be genetically modified. That's scary. If she is correct the next few months should produce some evidence. I saw somewhere today that Merck are discontinuing their development of a vaccine and are going to concentrate on developing effective treatments instead. If that's true it would be good

 

Yes.

Prudence, simple Prudence.

Cardinal Virtues.

 

As St Thomas Aquinas warned, as regards to Prudence we must often be more concerned for others rather than for one self.

I am not the least concerned for myself in these matters myself.

But I am very,very concerned for others.

So I exercise maximum Prudence..which is merely an expression of Wisdom.

Mary, Seat of Wisdom, pray for us.

 

Padraig, I'm not saying that her motives are questionable. I don't believe that for a second. I was merely raising a possible ulterior motive that we wouldn't rule out if she weren't one of our own and if she weren't being shut down by the prevailing powers. I've already said that I won't be taking the vaccine unless there's an ethical one produced and will wait for a year or so before taking that.

There's a lot of money in vaccines. Where there's money to be made there will be competition for a slice of the market or to dominate the market. If the virus continues to mutate it could well be like the 'flu, needing modified versions of the vaccines every year. That would make it a huge money spinner for years to come. I imagine that it wouldn't be possible to modify the vaccine unless you knew all the components and their proportions as well as what transpired in the trial stage to arrive at those proportions in the finished product. So, having a thorough knowledge of the make-up of the vaccine and any modifications in the preparation would help a rival company skip a few steps in developing their own vaccine and be an advantage to a potential employee of that company.

That's a devil's advocate argument that occurred to me as I watched those videos after reading Heidi's comment. And, lest anyone thinks I'm suggesting that Heidi was hinting at such a scenario, I don't believe for a second that she was.

 

I hope Dolores Cahill is wrong - I really do as my family members are getting the vaccine when it becomes available to them.

She has spoken out at great personal cost. I think even her family have been impacted a great deal by the controversy.

Type Dolores Cahill into Google and you will see DEBUNKED everywhere -

Now why would she go out on a limb and suffer so much personally unless she believed what she said?

So I do not doubt her sincerity since it has come at a price. It would have been much easier for her to say nothing.

But it seems in conscience she could not do that.

I still hope she is wrong though.

 

Well I am astounded

Last week when I typed her name into Google many of the pages were negative -- fact checked/debunked etc

Today it is a completely different set of results as if Google have removed a lot of the negative stuff!

But it could be that someone is promoting her webpage and membership of the Irish Freedom Party thus pushing the negative stuff down in the search results?

 

Yes, I'm hoping she is mistaken but I don't doubt her sincerity. Reading my devil's advocate post, I can see how ridiculous it is. Hope nobody was offended by it. It is possible that they have found a solution to the problems she raises but, if so, it's very strange that they won't clarify. "Debunked" isn't a very encouraging response for those of us worried about what the vaccine could do to vulnerable relatives.

 

I don't know if you are a pathologist or other expert in these fields. But based on your 4th reason for not trusting Dolores Cahill, may I point out that it would be a disgrace if a vaccine were to be given to people of any age when it is stated that "They (experts) don't know that humans would have that same reaction (as mice?)." ie. die because of the experiment. Unless you support the view that it is ok for the general population to be treated as guinea pigs, whose lives are of no relevance whether they live or die.

I hope these Professors, continue to dig in and investigate what the hell is going on. And good for Dolores Cahill that she should use her knowledge and experience to call out the doctors and especially the Irish Premier (a doctor it appears) and take him to task for hood winking the Irish over all this; closing down the economy and placing the population under house arrest for a marxist experiment to frighten the foeces out of everyone, just to get them under control. For shame on these looney lefties who will have to answer to God for what they are doing to the population around the world.

 

Yes, I agree with you Padraig. A woman like Dolores Cahill has a reputation to protect, she is involved in all this at an international level.

Why would a woman of that calibre risk her reputation. She is taking the Irish Prime Minister to law, and making families aware they can sue their doctors if they put covid as a cause of death when the patient had no covid; but died of other known causes.

Every time a doctor or medical expert comes out and calls all this into question, there are too many people ready to dismiss them as looneys.

It is just like the American election, where transparency and open discussion is treated like a threat, and has to be silenced.