You certainly can come up with the most outrageous accusations you regularly sling at others and w/ no understanding of the question being addressed. You might try the same tactic with Archbishop Vigano who certainly accuses, by name, those within the institutional church who are outside the true magisterium. I already gave a beautiful definition of the True Magisterium from Cardinal Hickey. You might try to find it again because if you actually read it it appears that it wasn't comprehended. A little refresher for you..... "We need to ensure that our life of faith has strong foundations in the authentic teachings of the Church." "The magisterium is truly at the service of the Word of God by ensuring that the teaching of Christ will come to us in all its entirety, without dilution or distortion." "We cannot be content with the view that religion is simply a matter of subjective opinion." So just the opposite from what you project.....those who follow authorities who distort the true teachings are the ones in danger of following any now evolving schismatic group in service to the world (not the Word) and, as AB Vigano states, in service now to the global Deep State while dividing and causing confusion to the faithful. Instead of encouraging the faithful to follow without question any prelate of the institutional church you might become aware of the works of Satan (back to Paul VI's warning) being carried out within such groups and prevent a personal future of surrendering one's soul to that man made institution dedicated to material security alone. If one doesn't know what is the Truth of the Magisterium to be taught by all to all, the great confusion of the times might tempt to only care about material security rather than the eternal securing of the soul. For instance: In a recent interview published by katholisch.de, the official internet portal of the Catholic Church in Germany, Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich stated that he is “open” to women becoming priests.......and called the widespread fall in church-attendance since the COVID-19 lockdowns a possible “opportunity” that would lead the Church to set itself up “differently.” Cardinal Hollerich is one of the most prominent cardinals in Europe. As Archbishop of Luxembourg – his nomination dates back to 2011 – his diocese is but a small one; however, since March 2018, he was elected president of the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Union (COMECE). He was made a cardinal by Pope Francis in October 2019. ....... The new Jesuit cardinal was invited as one of Pope Francis’ personal guests to the Amazon Synod. He was also one of Pope Francis’ appointees to the 2018 Synod of Bishops on Youth, Faith, and vocational discernment. A rising star under the present pontificate, Cardinal Hollerich was made a member of the Pontifical Council for Culture on February 21, 2020, and a member of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue on July 8, 2020. I'm dealing with the current reality while you appear to be concerned only with semantics which in this case sounds like you believe that one can feel safe w/ any member of the institutional church without question or responsibility for one's own faith.
“It is forbidden, as well as sinful, to propagate private revelations which have received a negative judgment from the local bishop, the conference of bishops, or the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.” https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=6602
I trust in Pope John Paul 2 and Pope Benedict. The magisterium is the same until now. Will you follow Viganó? Good Luck. I do not waste my time. This man could be some type of false prophet if he start to create a schism. Stay tuned
"Follow Vigano", your possible "false prophet"?.......quite a jump from simply keeping informed by one who has a most all encompassing view of the world and the church....that's what shepherds do and are expected to do for the faithful. Don't leave them to the wolves. You aren't "following" and/or praying for Pope Francis in the present moment??
Reference to the "Institutional Church" gives me a headache. There is only one Church - the Catholic Church instituted by Jesus when He said ""Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church".
Pedro Regis – Do Not Allow the Devil’s Darkness to Lead You Our Lady Queen of Peace to Pedro Regis on September 29, 2020 (33rd Anniversary of the Apparitions): Dear children, I am the Queen of Peace and I have come from Heaven to lead you to the One who is your Sole and True Savior. Open your hearts and accept what comes from the Lord. Do not allow the Devil’s darkness to lead you away from the path of salvation. The Lord has sent Me to call you to conversion and holiness. Do not stray from the path that I have pointed out to you. The way of holiness is full of obstacles, but the Lord loves you and will be with you. Courage. Turn away from the world and live turned towards Paradise, for which alone you were created. Bend your knees in prayer. Humanity is sick and needs to be healed. You are heading towards a future of doubts and uncertainties. Be faithful to Jesus and His Teachings. Whatever happens, stay with the true Magisterium of the Church of My Jesus. I love you as you are and I ask you to live out My Appeals. You have freedom, but it is best to do God’s Will. Onward without fear. I will pray to my Jesus for you. This is the message that I give you today in the name of the Most Holy Trinity. Thank you for having allowed Me to gather you here once more. I bless you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen. Be at peace. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Archbishop Vigano - ........ But, he laments, Biden and "the universal religion advocated by the United Nations and by Freemasonry finds active collaborators in the leaders of the Catholic Church who usurp its authority and adulterate its Magisterium." ............. Viganò labels this the "deep Church" — "a foreign body, subversive and devoid of any legitimacy that uses the institution in which it is embedded to achieve goals diametrically opposed to those of the institution itself." https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/vigano-biden-victory-heralds-dystopian-dictatorship
I support and AB Vigano fully. He does not engage in theoretical ideas, but simply stated facts. If you ever have a chance to learn about Vigano a bit more, please take the opportunity. He is truly a man of God. In listening to him speak once, I came to the conclusion that his so called "downfall" was simply trying to get the church to be open about the sex abuse in the church. I have seen him quoted several times by parish priest here in the US. He tells it like it is, which a bit refreshing for a modern Catholic. I know in my parish, I sure could use a priest that would tell it like it is sometimes. A good video with some quick info from YouTube:
May I offer, I heard Mother Miriam on Holy Family radio today comment regarding Fr M's bishop. Why would a Bishop support a Priest or prophet when he doesn't believe anything about even the Warning? Best we appreciate there may be other context involved b4 we join in chastising a holy priest. I personally defer to the holiness of Padre Pio. He was also tormented by evil spirits. Time will reveal many facts. Peace & charity
The Warning is not part of the teachings of the Church. It is nowhere in the Catechism. There is not even an approved private revelation that specifically outlines the Warning. People often cite St. Faustina's diary, but the diary talks about a cross appearing before the end, not of the Warning as it is discussed in "Countdown to the Kingdom." Garabandal, I believe, mentions the warning but it has not been accepted as worthy of belief. Two bishops with jurisdiction over him disavowed Fr. Rodrigue's messages. They said he had been untruthful in calling himself an exorcist. Bishop Lemay said Fr. Rodrigue had not kept him informed about his messages, as he had claimed. He failed the first item on the Vatican Guidelines, which calls for an examination of the character of the messenger. .
I think I'll stay on the side of caution. I believe the anti christ will be a wolf in sheep's clothing. So lets be careful we are not deceived by cardinals who do not have respect for our Pope and openly attack him. Our Pope is still our pope and Jesus is using him to reveal truths, to clean up His Holy Church by exposing those in His Church. And I don't like attacks on the Holy man of God. I too am at times surprised and shocked, but hold back because I Trust in Jesus. Regardless of personal opinions, or mistakes he may make (our pope) the Holy Spirit placed him in the seat of Peter. So when we attack him, are we not attacking the decisions of the Holy Spirit? "Stay with the true Magesterium of the Church". What does the Blessed Virgin mean here when saying "stay"? Stay with a group of those who preach and believe in the true magesterium or stay firm in the belief of the true magesterium- what has been preached for centuries and not a "group" ? Just wondering what your opinions are.