Woolsey fire destroys scores of homes, forcing 200,000 to evacuate; flames get closer to Pepperdine https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2018/11/09/woolsey-fire-75k-homes-evacuated/ Surreal scenes unfold as a fire ‘like Armageddon’ barrels toward West Hills http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ventura-county-fires-20181110-story.html Message to Luz de Maria, 9/20/18 Nature will once again tell man that he cannot compete with its force; Mexico will suffer, and I ask you to pray for this country, as well as for Los Angeles, California, and for the rest of America.
Very unusual for CA to have fires of this magnitude this late in the year and many of their hotshots have been laid off for the season. Crews from Oregon and other neighboring states are down there or en route now. High winds again today in many of these areas. God bless all that put themselves in harm's way to help others, saint Michael watch over and protect them.
Check out this one of several Q drops today: (anybody paranoid yet? Seems "they're everywhere; they're everywhere"! or "It's bigger than both of us"!) And yet we see messages about controls from the elitist "above" attempting to create chaos for the "bigger" cause. Everything now seems to be occurring in big liberal strongholds.....where the Trump opposition to the "plan" is causing panic. He continues to fight and more so as the swamp placements get desperate to not reveal their own guilt. 2467 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.442 Nov 10 2018 12:21:14 (EST) 6050f1c2ccebd48eca6919a9dfd82d7f6be18e35f7c28396c1b1605bd45d27c7.jpgDkF49eIWwAE8VQr.jpg Do you believe in coincidences? How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Expand your thinking. >Amount of fires in CA past 12-months? >Amount of fires in CA past 10-years? >Date FED funding cut off from CA as result of violation(s) of Sanctuary State/City? >CA budget cuts past 12-months re: Fire & Prevention? >>Reduce/eliminate dry brush clean up? >>Reduce/eliminate tree-line clean up? >>Reduce/eliminate fire break installation(s)? >>Reduce/eliminate chopper fly over(s) to target 'high exposure' areas? >>Reduce/eliminate population areas exposure & fire break safety management? >>Reduce/eliminate use of inmates [correction facilities] for Highway clean up and dry brush removal? What is the primary purpose of declaring a State of Emergency? What determines the size of the FED payment to a State that has declared a State of Emergency? What is the current debt of CA? The More You Know… Q
Hmmmmm...... PG&E Could Be to Blame For Sparking Camp Fire In Butte County https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/11/09/pge-could-be-to-blame-camp-fire/
We had horrible fires late in the year last December 8th, also, that caused massive property loss. The strong Santa Ana winds take the embers and blow them everywhere on dry brush. I still do not put much stock in Q. And although I have lost respect for the person who calls himself, 'Sundance.' I note that he thinks 'Q' is fraudulent. He says there are no 60k sealed indictments. Q keeps stringing people along. From what I gather from the posts here, Q says something will happen on Nov. 11 th? I truly doubt that. I do agree with your thinking that fraud happens after the ballots are delivered. I worked as a precinct inspector for the election. Every election officer must undergo 3 hours of training and a booklet 100 pages long is issued to them. There are multiple levels of security that are in place to prevent fraud at the polls. Once we deliver the ballots, that must be where the trickery takes place. One proposition was to let the electorate decide about whether or not to impose a gasoline tax. Even that failed! Dianne Feinstein at the age of 85 years old was re-elected senator. I pray every day for Californians. I pray for the intercession of all the Saints that are named over places, cities, mountains, faults, etc....all those wonderful Saints.... I pray that they intercede before the throne of the Holy Trinity for the conversion and salvation of all Californians.
11/11 was/is the day Trump was scheduled to meet with Putin.....originally semi-planned to be in Paris but apparently changed to the current summit in a more unofficial setting due to Putin's incursions around Poland and the Baltics. Apparently all those levels of security are not recognized in places like Broward County in FL with a history of fraud. And in another O'Keefe undercover video the poll worker openly admits to permitting illegals to vote just as long as there is some form of ID. If they can't win the power legally then it's the tactic of delay for months into next year to prevent PT from having the more powerful Senate and ability to easily place more conservative Justices in SCOTUS. After all if they did what they did to Kavanaugh they'll do anything....desperate! There are even offers of donation of ribs and organs to prop up Ginsburg!!
Praying Medic, one of the best Q decoders, announces here that he thinks they're getting ready to censor his videos and perhaps blocking him from social media entirely......tactics of Google/youtube now against conservative speech (as well as Twitter/Facebook): Will YouTube Suspend My Channel? https://prayingmedic.com/2018/11/09/will-youtube-suspend-my-channel/ I suppose Q would say, again, to watch who's being targeted by the swamplings.....for they are the biggest threat!
Lodi Man Gets Second Chance At Life When Brain Tumor Vanishes Without Surgery https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/11/09/lodi-second-chance-brain-tumor/ Lodi Man Gets Second Chance At Life When Brain Tumor Vanishes Without Surgery It’s a medical mystery that’s left several doctors scratching their heads. A suspected malignant brain tumor vanishes without treatment giving a patient a second chance at life. sacramento.cbslocal.com Credits his and his community's prayer for the miracle.
Are people really this stupid? Making themselves extensions of Satan's cause. And so far just for convenience....not survival....that comes next. More for those already complying (innocently?) with the "system" and less for those who haven't or won't. See how long "opting in" will last. Alarm over talks to implant UK employees with microchips Trades Union Congress concerned over tech being used to control and micromanage Britain’s biggest employer organisation and main trade union body have sounded the alarm over the prospect of British companies implanting staff with microchips to improve security. UK firm BioTeq, which offers the implants to businesses and individuals, has already fitted 150 implants in the UK. The tiny chips, implanted in the flesh between the thumb and forefinger, are similar to those for pets. They enable people to open their front door, access their office or start their car with a wave of their hand, and can also store medical data. Another company, Biohax of Sweden, also provides human chip implants the size of a grain of rice. It told the Sunday Telegraph (£) that it is in discussions with several British legal and financial firms about fitting their employees with microchips, including one major company with hundreds of thousands of employees. The CBI, which represents 190,000 UK businesses, voiced concerns about the prospect. A CBI spokesperson said: “While technology is changing the way we work, this makes for distinctly uncomfortable reading. Firms should be concentrating on rather more immediate priorities and focusing on engaging their employees.” The TUC is worried that staff could be coerced into being microchipped. Its general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “We know workers are already concerned that some employers are using tech to control and micromanage, whittling away their staff’s right to privacy. “Microchipping would give bosses even more power and control over their workers. There are obvious risks involved, and employers must not brush them aside, or pressure staff into being chipped.” Steven Northam, the founder and owner of Hampshire-based BioTeq, told the Guardian that most of its 150 implants have been for individuals, while some financial and engineering firms have also had the chips implanted in their staff. BioTeq has also implanted them in employees of a bank testing the technology, and has shipped them to Spain, France, Germany, Japan and China. They cost between £70 and £260 per person. Northam himself and all the directors at BioTeq and one of his other companies, IncuHive, have been microchipped. Jowan Österlund, the founder of Biohax and a former body piercer, told the Telegraph that his microchips, which cost £150 each, could help financial and legal firms improve security. “These companies have sensitive documents they are dealing with. [The chips] would allow them to set restrictions for whoever.” Österlund said big companies, with 200,000 employees, could offer this as an opt-in. “If you have a 15% uptake that is still a huge number of people that won’t require a physical ID pass.” Last year Wisconsin-based Three Square Market partnered with Biohax and became the first company in the US to microchip its employees, on a voluntary basis. KPMG, one of the big four accountancy firms, said it was not planning to microchip its employees and “would under no circumstances consider doing so”. Fellow accounting firms EY and PwC also said they would not consider microchipping their employees. Deloitte declined to comment. Biohax has plans to open an office in London, according to its website. It claims 4,000 people have been microchipped, mostly in Sweden. It is working with the state-owned Swedish rail firm Statens Järnvägar, to allow its passengers to travel via chip implants rather than train tickets. Biohax did not respond to requests for comment. https://www.theguardian.com/technol...talks-to-implant-uk-employees-with-microchips
Who would ever have thought that the delusional cloud would be allowed to grow to this point!! Democrats: ‘Cruel and Unscientific’ to Define Legal Sex by Biology It is “cruel and unscientific” to define a person’s legal sex by their biology, says a complaint signed by 98 Democratic House legislators. The Democrats’ statement was sent to President Donald Trump’s administration after the New York Times reported that the administration will formally clarify that the sex of people involved in sex-discrimination legal fights will be based on their male or female body. Trump’s biology-determines-sex policy “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world,” the Democrats complain their letter to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Democrats instead want government agencies to let people define their legal sex by declaring their internal feeling of male or female “gender identity,” regardless of their male or female body and biology. Yet there is no scientific or legal measure of “gender identity.” For example, one gay advocacy group defines gender identity as “One’s innermost concept of self as male, female, a blend of both or neither.” So any person could claim to have an opposite-sex “gender identity” and become a member of the other sex at any time, for as long or short a time as they wish. This identity-beats-biology change would erase any recognition of biological women and biological men from the law. For example, the transgender ideology says the idea of “women” would include men and women who say they have a female “gender identity.” Women who insist they are women would be redefined as “cis-gender women,” say transgender advocates. If gender defines sex, the nation’s anti-discrimination laws will force agencies, civic organizations, and cultural groups to bar recognition of the partly-different and complementary preferences and attributes of males and females. This revolutionary change would have profound consequences. For one minor example, a female theater director could face an anti-discrimination lawsuit if she repeatedly chooses women to play the female leads in Romeo and Juliet, even when the show is aimed at a female audience. In November, the company that sells Victoria’s Secret lingerie products was slammed because it does not use a mix of interchangeable men and women to model their clothing for women. Already, women are being erased from women’s sporting competitions when supposedly “transgender” men muscle their way to the winners’ podium. The 98 Democrats include Massachusetts Rep. Joe Kennedy, Kentucky Rep. John Yarmuth, Connecticut’s Reps. Elizabeth Esty and Joe Courtney, New Jersey Reps. Frank Pallone and Donald Norcross, Oregon Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, Maine Rep. Chellie Pingree, Texas Rep. Lloyd Doggett, New York Reps. Sean Patrick Maloney and Brian Higgins, California Rep. Scott Peters, Pennsylvania Reps. Brendan Boyle and Robert Brady, Washington Rep. Derek Kilmer, Minnesota Rep. Rick Nolan, and Illinois Rep. Mike Quigley. Rep. Kennedy is chairman of a Transgender Equality Task Force panel in Congress. But Trump’s biology-determines-sex policy would preserve the nation’s existing law and culture that accepts the near-universal view that that women and men are legally equal but also different and complementary. For example, the Pentagon has dropped former President Barack Obama’s pro-transgender policies and is now using the “bright line” of biology to determine each soldiers’ male or female status. “You know what I’m doing? I’m protecting everybody,” Trump said October 22. “We have a lot of different concepts right now. They have a lot of different things happening with respect to transgender, right now.” This biology-based perspective is seen everywhere in society. For example, TV producers carefully design their shows to appeal to the different tastes of men or women, and TV advertisers tune their commercials to match their female or male targets. In politics, feminists complain about male-to-female pay gaps, discrimination in work, and women’s healthcare priorities. The Democrats argue that the existence of a small percentage of people who have subtle genetic variations invalidates the long-standing and universal recognition that nearly all people have either male or female bodies and preferences. Defining a person’s sex by biology is “cruel and unscientific,” says the 98 Democrats. The Democrats insist that basing sex on biology “counters the consensus of medical providers and scientists across the globe who have found no reliable evidence to support such a [biological] definition.” The letter also gaslights Americans by pretending that the law already defines sex by “gender identity.” This pretense allows the Democrats to claim that Trump’s “re-defining [sex] raises countless practical, legal, and medical questions.” For example, the 98 Democrats claim that men and women will lose protections against sexual discrimination if legal sex is gauged by biology: This proposal intended to erase transgender people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a transgender person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and transgender children could be denied access to public education … We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of transgender people. All people are now protected by anti-discrimination rules regardless of their personalities or sex. But there is a growing number of legal disputes being created by progressives’ insistence that men are entitled to be women. In October, Breitbart News reported: Nine women have filed a lawsuit against a Fresno homeless shelter, accusing the nonprofit of allowing a transgender biological man claiming to be a woman to sexually harass them. … According to the lawsuit, each of the nine homeless women were staying at Naomi’s House – part of the shelter’s main campus in Fresno – in November 2017. The shelter’s rules require all women to shower daily. Though the shelter provides individual shower stalls, the women dress and undress in a common area. A “male who identifies as female,” and identified in the complaint by his initials, was also residing at Naomi’s House at the time. During the times when the women were dressing and undressing in the common area, the lawsuit claims the biological man made lewd comments to them about their breasts and other body parts. Some of the women charged the man was peering at them in the showers between the cracks in the stalls. These conflicts have been ignored by establishment media outlets. In the United Kingdom, however, a spectrum of political advocates have begun debating the civic impact of redefining sex as “gender identity.” In October, the left-wing Guardiannewspaper published an editorial saying that women’s rights are threatened by the transgender ideology: While campaigners for trans rights are entitled to push for laws that they believe advance equality, feminists are entitled to question whether such changes could adversely affect other women. Neither group is a homogeneous bloc and there are more than two points of view. … (cont'd below)
(cont'd from above) Women’s concerns about sharing dormitories or changing rooms with “male-bodied” people must be taken seriously. These are not just questions of safety but of dignity and fairness. … The public needs to be better informed, and safeguarding considered. The sex-based protections in the Equality Act, like case-by-case decision-making in the Prison Service, only work if service providers have adequate guidance and training. Where changes have been introduced or are proposed, including in prisons, women should be consulted. In response, several U.S.-based reporters for the Guardian denounced their editors’ defense of women’s rights and insisted that feminism denies women the right to object when men reach for women’s legal status: The editorial used a UK legal debate about IDs to argue that trans rights “collide” with cis women’s rights; that equality for trans women “could adversely affect other women”; and that allowing trans women to access public spaces threatens cis women’s “safety”. These arguments were met with particular dismay in the US as they echo the position of anti-trans legislators who have pushed overtly transphobic bathroom bills. … [W]omen’s intolerance should not be a legitimate reason for limiting the rights of trans women. The idea that all trans women should be denied civil rights … is the essence of bigotry and goes against feminist values. The reporters described their mission as advocacy for minorities, not truth-telling or explaining the concerns of a democratic majority: The Guardian has a proud history of fighting for the voiceless, the vulnerable and the disenfranchised. It was with that legacy in mind that our journalists who write and edit stories on LGBTQIA rights, women’s rights, politics, immigration, technology, business, criminal justice, gun policy and more decided to publicly voice our concern. Some of us have also seen first-hand the discrimination and violence trans women face. The reporters also lamented that advocates for the transgender ideology are refusing to talk to them because of the editorial: The Guardian in the US is committed to covering this important civil rights fight, but when the time came for us to report on Trump’s attacks, we encountered problems. Some trans people wouldn’t talk to us. That’s because, days earlier, the Guardian published an editorial that we believe promoted transphobic viewpoints, including some of the same assertions about gender that US politicians are citing in their push to eliminate trans rights. The transgender ideology is deeply unpopular, especially among women and parents. In 2017, Obama told NPR that his promotion of the transgender ideology made it easier for Donald Trump to win the presidency. Multiple polls show that most Americans wish to help and comfort people who think they are a member of the opposite sex, even as they also reject the transgender ideology’s claim that a person’s legal sex is determined by their feeling of “gender identity,” not by biology. (cont'd below)
(cont'd from above) The transgender movement is diverse, so its different factions have different goals and priorities. It includes sexual liberationists, progressives, feminists who wish to blurdistinctions between the two sexes, and people who glamorize the distinctions between the two sexes. It includes high-profile children, people who are trying to live as members of the opposite sex, and people trying to “detransition” back to their sex, men who demandsex from lesbians, masculine autogynephiles, wealthy donors, politicians, political professionals, and medical service providers. Very few people who describe themselves as transgender undergo cosmetic surgery of the genitals. Only about 4,118 Americans surgically altered their bodies in hospitals from 2000 to 2014 to appear like members of the opposite sex, according to a pro-transgender medical study. Yet the gender ideology is rapidly gaining power, aided by huge donations from wealthy individuals and medical companies. In Ohio, for example, in February, a judge forced parents of a teenage girl to give up custody so she can begin a lifetime of drug treatments and surgery that will allow her to appear as a male. The progressive push to bend Americans’ attitudes and their male and female civic society around the idea of “gender identity” has already attacked and cracked many of the popular social rules that help Americans manage the cooperation and competition among and between complementary, different, and equal men and women. These pro-gender claims have an impact on different-sex bathrooms, shelters for battered women, sports leagues for girls, hiking groups for boys, K-12 curricula, university speech codes, religious freedoms, free speech, the social status of women, parents’ rights in childrearing, children’s safety, practices to help teenagers, health outcomes, women’s ideals of beauty, culture and civic society, scientific research, prison safety, civic ceremonies, school rules, men’s sense of masculinity, law enforcement, military culture, and children’s sexual privacy. https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...-unscientific-to-define-legal-sex-by-biology/
I can't imagine during the period of Sodom and Gomorrah that things were complex as they are in todays disordered world, but apparently the Democtrat party was not formed yet back then. But, the end result will be the same, up in smoke and sulfur fire.
Father Z's blog has another interesting post. http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/11/strange-signs-the-end-times-and-you/ Strange Signs, the End Times and YOU Posted on 12 November 2018 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf What times we are seeing. Benedict abdicated and lightning struck the dome of St. Peter’s. A Jesuit is elected. A Jesuit, who trashes the symbols of office and sows confusion. Catholics vote for pro-abortion politicians. Total eclipses draw an X over the the Madrid fault of these USA. Conferences of bishops, on the basis of a footnote, openly advocate Communion for people the state of mortal sin. Leading and visible prelates actively support and cover for sodomites. Heavenly messages to Popes and Saints and also from the Mother of God point to the end of an era around our time now. Flawless red heifers can now be bred in Israel, signaling the foundation of a Third Temple. Demographic shifts suggest that a great Apostasy is taking place among the rank and file of those who hail from Christian backgrounds. And… Holy Church remains Authoritative, Infallible, Indefectible and One, Holy Catholic and Apostolic. At BeliefNet I read… Fish in the Dead Sea and a Snake in the Wailing Wall: Signs of the End Times Appear in Jerusalem Are the end times upon us? According to those keeping a close eye on the strange happenings in Israel, the answer might well be “yes.” Predictions about the end of the world seem to appear every time there is an unusual celestial phenomenon, such as a lunar eclipse or a comet’s arrival, but the eerie signs in Israel are both more common and more bizarre. The first of the three strange occurrences was the birth of the first “red heifer in 2,000 years.” The calf in question was given an “extensive examination” to see if she was actually “blemish free” as is specified in the Bible. According to end times literature, the red calf “brings the promise of reinstating Biblical purity to the world” and will be sacrificed prior to the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem. Rabbinical experts have found that the calf is “without blemish” as defined by Scripture and thus is a “viable candidate for the Biblical red heifer.” The birth of a calf seems commonplace, but the second oddity in Israel has baffled scientists across the world. The Dead Sea is known for its overwhelming salinity. The extraordinary abundance of salt in the water makes it both a popular tourist destination and an environment that is completely inhospitable to almost every form of life on the planet. The sinkholes around its edges, however, have inexplicably been filled with fish. Where the fish have come from is unknown, and they have been joined by the return of vegetation to the otherwise barren area. This fits the prophet Ezekiel’s claims that the Dead Sea and the area around it would flourish with life before the world came to an end. [Ezekiel 47:9 – Also, as levels of the Dead Sea drop, sink holes are being discovered with fish! However, it seems that there are underground fresh water aquafers which reduce the salinity in those sinkholes, creating microclimates. Still: there are death defying fish in the Dead Sea: 37% salinity.] The final eerie happening in Israel is enough to send shivers down the spine of even the most skeptical. A snake crawled out of the stones of the Wailing Wall, one of Israel’s holiest sites. Worshipers, understandably, “panic[ed].” The snake was identified as a coin-marked snake, or leaden-colored racer, and it was not a small specimen either. [Hemorrhosis nummifer! As opposed to other slitheries such as Sphaleros jesuiticus.] Rough estimates place it at over three feet long. The appearance of the snake was not the first frightening incident to take place at the Wailing Wall this year, as a falling stone nearly crushed a women praying below in July 2018. That said, there is something more ominous about the unexpected appearance of the animal so often associated with evil in the Bible in a place that is meant to be filled with worship. [Yeah… I sure know how that feels. Hey. I just had a thought: Is the Bronx Zoo Cobra Jewish? He gets out and around.] What precisely these signs mean, if anything, is up for debate, but there is no doubt that end of the world bloggers have just received more than enough material to keep them busy through the end of the year. [Maybe to the end of the day.] There are also a lot of people undoubtedly grabbing for their Bibles in order to refresh themselves on the signs of the end times, just in case more of them appear. [As is only right to do!] How much attention we give to these matters and what they mean is itself a matter for debate. Every generation of Christian has known itself to be in The End Times, because it is. Since the Lord Ascended, we are in the End Times. However, one of these days, the Times with be “Endier” than others. One way or another, you are going before the Lord, the Just Judge, the King of Fearful Majesty. You will be JUDGED. Nothing can be hidden from Him. Nothing left unrevealed. Everything will be brought into the open. If you die before the End, you will experience your Particular Judgment. Every thought, deed, omission – everything – HEY BISHOPS! YOU READING THIS? – will be examined and weighed. You state when you die will be confirmed for ETERNITY. When the Lord comes, if we are still alive or not, the General Judgement will take place. Every thought, word and deed will be revealed and it will be shown how they all worked together in God’s great plan, the economy of salvation. Then Christ will take everything and submit it to the Father so that God may be all and all. Then the unending reign of glory shall begin… with you or without you. Definitively. No changes of state. No “backs”. No. GO TO CONFESSION. Examine your consciences every day. Make peace with your neighbors. Perform works of mercy. Pray. Do penance. The day will come and we don’t know when. Pray God to spare you from a sudden and unprovided death, as we do in the Litany.
The people given over to their sin was the majority. Things were complex IMO but accepted probably because there was little to no opposition in a pagan land ruled by perversion and human sacrifice. It's actually part of the same story in a way. When Israel forsake God and was taken into captivity by the Babylonians for hundreds of years they certainly did not give up their perversions and worship of idols, they took it with them into Babylon. It continued on because it was wholly acceptable in that forsaken place and in fact grew with the scribes and Pharisees, coming into great power over the people which Jesus bitterly denounced and even named the synagogue of Satan. They then after the destruction of the Temple and trying to first unsuccessfully return to Babylon were driven into Europe where they could not practice such things openly because it had become a Christian place with secular rulers bowing to Christ the King. The same is happening today and has become institutionalized in America who God favored with our break away from the rebellious man god King of England but over time has been infected with all forms of immoral and filthy rulers and is now falling away, filth which was once hidden is being defended and taught to our children as being worthy of tolerance and dialogue by some of our own priests. The overwhelming majority of the rest remain silent because they are rent a Sheppard's. Our media and hollywood rewrite history to condemn Christianity instead and this is taught to our kids to wipe out the truth and most importantly the consequences of following lies instead of God. It is no coincidence. The decrease in morality and Faith in God is directly related to the coming of the man of sin. How many even know what is taught regarding these things by the Church Fathers.
