I have never considered 9/11 to be an inside job until now. Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community, has published a report by four experts who say “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” Conclusion It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities. Full article here - really interesting http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf
I remember 9/11 like yesterday, and would never even entertain the idea that maybe it was an inside job. It was too unpatriotic, too horrific an idea to consider - until about a year ago. I've seen video footage and read reports and listened to analysis now that have me convinced that it may in fact have been an inside job, and perhaps part of a diabolical plan all along. I'm of the opinion that this has the new world order, Illuminati, and Masons written all over it
Science is empirical, so if you hear a bunch of engineers saying that the planes causing the twin towers to fall was impossible, well, that's just because there haven't been a lot of experiments with demolition by Airbus and they don't know what they're talking about. Ironically, the pride that is leading them to invent a conspiracy is the same pride that motivated whoever inspired the terrorists. Besides that, the U.S. Government is nowhere near organized enough to pull off something like this (would that it was), neither are the illuminati or Masons. The latter may have created a spiritual vacuum which would inevitably lead to this, but it's not like they hired bin laden (like the CIA did in their infinite wisdom). I blame laziness, stupidity, incompetence and pride. And, on the terrorists' side, lust, rage, and actually believing in the Koran. So, demons. Amazing how pride always shows up.
Interesting conclusions, although I still find it hard to believe that our Government would pull something like that off but I don't rule it out. Ever since our beloved JFK was gunned down I always take "the official version" with a grain of salt. I clearly remember most of the hijackers being from Saudi Arabia. I also remember the Bush family being real cozy with the Saudi elites and even whisking some high profile Saudis out of the country just after 9/11. I also have friend who flies Commercial planes like the ones used in the attack and said that it would be very hard for someone without any training and extensive flight time in a jumbo jet to be able to manipulate multiple systems in the plane and fly it proficiently at high speed to a target on the ground. He said even experienced pilot would have a hard time hitting a specific building at those speeds. The fact that 3 out of 4 targets were hit by a bunch of guys that couldn't even handle a Cessna 172 is something he found highly suspect, and I am inclined to believe him. As a side note, my first and only time in NYC was about a week before 9/11. I got to go up on the WTC among other things. It was a clear day just like 9/11. Those memories still make me uneasy knowing that some of the workers I saw at the top probably lost their lives a little over a week later.
It is hard for any God-fearing person to imagine that one of the world's worst terrorist attacks could have been home grown. It was beyond my ability to even look into the possibility. Until several years ago. There is an association of airline pilots that have banded together to propose just that the Saudi's did not possess the skills to target the WTC. Their proof of the personal incompetency of the new pilots was shown by the records and log books of these guys with instructor's notes included. They are compelling. There is also an association of architects and chemical engineers who are quite accomplished in their fields who feel compelled to expose what they believe is the most tragic con leveled on the U.S. citizens. They have suffered much personal loss and character assassination for their efforts. This is a story from the perspective of Dr. Steven Jones, a chemical engineer. He represents a huge list of truly brilliant professionals who can't bring themselves to shut up and keep their jobs. I believe they have well-formed consciences. These investigations are not for everyone. But it is not a stretch at all for me to believe that the U.S. is capable of such evil. Not anymore.
Thank you - this was what I had seen that convinced me of the likelihood as well. Very convincing, unfortunately
I am so disappointed in this message board that this is a thread. Popular mechanics dispelled all these myths and conspiracy theories a few years back. That is all this is, a disgusting conspiracy theory that has been dispelled. http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a49/1227842/ Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks." "Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat. But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.
Yes!!! Long PAST TIME to shelve the 9/11 Insider-Job BS!!! I'd suggest all here spend time/effort preparing for THE STORM of Here/Now!! GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!
Well, I had a very nagging feeling that something wasn't quite right on the actual day of 9/11, when I saw Pres. Bush on tv reading to a small group of students. I believe he was in Florida at the time, when a man came in from the left of the picture and whispered in the President's ear about what had taken place. The President was not shocked at all, and had a kind of a smirk on his face. I felt it then. Now things are beginning to unravel. There is nothing concealed that won't be revealed. That is Biblical. It is just that we don't always have to wait for the Final Judgment. A friend of mine used to pray that the truth will come out and people will be helped.
I dont know what you were watching, his face looked like shock... but to put it in perspective watch this http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/george-w-bush-and-the-infamous-7-minutes-on-911-video
Dean - I would understand your disappointment if I had put a link on this subject from Prison Planet or some other conspiracy website. But the link is to an article in a serious period review article from the top European Physicists written by experts in the field of engineering. You cannot just dismiss them because you feel like it. Did you actually read the article? It can be found here - http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf I have always denied conspiracy theory when it came to 9/11. Always. Until I read this article and now I am more open to this issue than before. This article was written featured in a serious period review in a magazine of the European Physics magazine (24 August 1916) http://www.europhysicsnews.org/ The authors are experts in their field. They are not conspiracy theorists but serious physicists and cannot be dismissed lightly. Steven Jones is a former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University. His major research interests have been in the areas of fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry. He has authored or co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of extremely high temperatures during the WTC destruction and evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust. Robert Korol is a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, as well as a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute of Canada. His major research interests have been in the areas of structural mechanics and steel structures. More recently, he has undertaken experimental research into the post-buckling resistance of H-shaped steel columns and into the energy absorption associated with pulverization of concrete floors steel columns and into the energy absorption associated with pulverization of concrete floors. Anthony Szamboti is a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries. Since 2006, he has authored or co-authored a number of technical papers on the WTC high-rise failures that are published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies and in the International Journal of Protective Structures. Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers. In 2015, he authored AE- 911Truth’s Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. He holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
But the people who wrote the article are experts in structural engineering so it is not B/S!!! But I am off to prepare for the STORM.
Please only contribute to this thread if you have read the article I linked from top scientists in the field of structural engineering. And if you are interested in discussing this is a serious way as I am. I have printed out the article read and will read it again. It cannot be easily dismissed. If you have a problem with the thread then read the article and then refute the science. Stop calling it B/S or conspiracy theory nonsense when you have been too lazy to read the article. Now I am starting to get angry and you won't like me when the red mist descends ! You have been warned!
I've known it was a false flag for 12-13 years now. I've ran full circle from serious, heated debates and being call a conspiracy nut etc, to now having moved past debating pointlessly and fruitlessly. But I fully support the digging into all the relevant info regarding anything we are told that doesn't seem right. No one wants or likes to be deceived. In the end whether you see it or don't see it let it serve to strengthen your faith and trust in Jesus. Don't loose your peace trying to bring others to see what you see. Some will, many won't. Whether satanic elite powers or cave dwelling radical Muslims, the big picture doesn't change. The goal is heaven. For the record I would be my life on 9/11 as a false flag, just not my soul. We are all on the same side when.it comes to Christ.
