After the Strzok Stonewall Here’s what Trump should declassify if he wants the truth known. FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok testifies before the the House Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform during a hearing on "Oversight of FBI and DOJ Actions Surrounding the 2016 Election," on Capitol Hill, Thursday, July 12, 2018, in Washington. Photo: Evan Vucci/Associated Press By The Editorial Board | July 13, 2018 264 COMMENTS https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-...mod=yahoo_itp&yptr=yahoo&ns=prod/accounts-wsj FBI agent Peter Strzok’s appearance before Congress Thursday was a predictable political circus, and here’s what we learned: President Trump will have to declassify a host of documents if he wants Americans to learn the truth about what happened in 2016. Mr. Strzok was combative, and he pointed to an FBI lawyer in the room as reason not to disclose much of anything about his investigation into the Russia connections of the Trump campaign. Under pressure from Ohio’s Jim Jordan, Mr. Strzok did reveal that Justice Department official Bruce Ohr acted as a channel between the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS and the FBI in 2016. We already knew that Mr. Ohr’s wife Nellie worked for Fusion. This means that Fusion, an outfit on the payroll of the Clinton campaign, had a messenger on the government payroll to deliver its anti-Trump documents to the FBI. This confirms that the FBI relied on politically motivated sources as part of its probe, even as Mr. Strzok insists he showed no political bias in his investigating decisions. Yet if this is the most Congress could pry out of the FBI’s lead Russia investigator over 10 hours, legislative oversight won’t discover the truth. Mr. Trump will have to help Congress by ordering Justice and the FBI to declassify the relevant documents. Consistent with protecting legitimate sources and methods, here is the document list Mr. Trump should want released: • The FISA applications. Justice and the FBI made one application and three renewals for warrants against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. The text of those applications would show the degree to which the FBI relied on the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele at the request of Fusion GPS. They would also show how honest FBI and Justice were with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that approves warrants. • Woods procedures documents. The FBI is required to vet and support the facts its presents to a FISA court when it seeks a warrant to eavesdrop on a U.S. citizen. These rules are known as Woods procedures, and releasing sections of this Woods file would show the extent to which the FBI verified the dossier or other evidence it used as its justification to listen to Trump campaign aides. More broadly, Mr. Trump should declassify any document that demonstrates what the FBI and Justice knew about the provenance and accuracy of the Fusion-Steele dossier. • The 302s. These forms include information taken from the notes FBI agents make while interviewing a source or subject. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley last week asked Justice to declassify the 302s for 12 separate FBI interviews with Mr. Ohr concerning his contacts with Mr. Steele. Declassifying other 302s related to the subjects in this probe (including former Trump aides George Papadopoulos, Michael Flynn ) would reveal what the FBI was told, who provided what information, and how much came from politically motivated sources. • The 1023s. These are the equivalent of 302s for counterintelligence, and they document FBI debriefings with informants or sources. Mr. Trump should declassify these and other documents showing interaction between the FBI and Mr. Steele, Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, Fusion backer Dan Jones, informant Stefan Halper, or anyone the FBI used to keep tabs on the Trump campaign. These documents would reveal the extent and dates of the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign. Mr. Trump is undoubtedly being told that declassifying these documents would set a bad precedent, or risk accusations that he is undermining special counsel Bob Mueller’s investigation. But the worst precedent would be letting mistrust and partisan suspicion persist over how law enforcement behaved during a presidential campaign. Mr. Mueller’s probe is also moving ahead without interference, as his indictment Friday of a dozen Russian agents for hacking Democratic National Committee computers shows. But indictments of Russians who will never see a U.S. courtroom don’t tell us anywhere near the complete story. That duty falls to Congress, not to a special counsel whose job is deciding whether or not to prosecute crimes. Mr. Trump is going to be attacked no matter what he does. He should declassify these records or stop complaining about his Justice Department’s lack of cooperation. Appeared in the July 14, 2018, print edition.
https://americandigitalnews.com/201...family-connection-spans-decades/#.W0rY1bzDH6g The OBAMA and STRZOK family connection that spans DECADES. [1] 7/14/2018 – UPDATE Strzok connected to Haiti 7/10/2018 – UPDATE Additional information has been found that bears review: Link HERE This is Peter Strzok . He is in his 40s. He works for the FBI . He was the only person to interview Hillary Clinton, with no recording, on her HRC Email investigation. How many STRZOK family members are there? There are only 100 total Americans out of 300 million with this name . You can Google this. Peter Strzok must be unique in such a small family, right? The father of Peter Strzok (ii) is Peter Strzok Sr, and he was in the Army core of engineers. Oh, he was actually a career expert in sanctions and nuclear activity in Iran . [2] The younger brother of Peter Strzok Sr is Mark Strzok who works for Mammoet – They are world leaders in big cranes, with a speciality in moving nuclear Reactors. [3] The son of Mark Strzok is Devin Strzok , who is a coast guard graduate and now also lives in DC . [4] The wife of Mark Strzok … and mom of Devin Strzok … is Mariana Srtzok .. Mariana (or Mary) is the daughter of General James Cartwright. Devin Strzok is actually Devin Cartwright Strzok . His grandfather, General James Cartwright, was pardoned by Barrack Obama on his last day of office. Cartwright was accused of leaking info on stuxnet. Another brother of Peter Strzok Sr is James Strzok – A Jesuit priest working in Kenya! With, no surprise, a solid military career, and deep knowledge in energy / resources.. Wow, what is this… an emergency meeting between Devin Strzok in the situation room in the Whitehouse West Wing in May 2015? With his new wife, at 9:45PM at night? Just an everyday meeting with the wife, also in the military (also a Strzok) with Osbaldo Cantu about geospacial technology… Just so happens his uncle Peter Strzok was the last person on earth to see the deleted HRC emails. So that is 6 out of 100 Strzok family members involved? Don’t get me started about the connections of all of them to Uranium … Strzok family reunions can probably turn on lightbulbs while they are still in the packaging. And then the wife of Peter Strzok – Melissa Hodgman. Just so happens she was promoted to her role as a director in the SEC at the same time the FBI was drafting the exoneration letter for the HRC emails. Just another meeting in the West Wing with Peter Strzok 2, his wife Melissa Hodgman, and their two kids who kept the last name of Hodgman. Nothing to see here. Osbaldo Cantu was there too with Melissa Hodgman and Peter Strzok. Maybe the kids were just checked in and allowed to play in the oval office while they also talked about how much that would be worth to China. As @TruthinGov2016 pointed out, Peter Strzok was THE person who requested the server containing the HRC email backups, and the last person to see it in Oct 2015. Extroardonary. [5] And the wife, Melissa Hodgman, was involved in some nasty SEC action against China. I think Sloppy Steve Bannon might know something about this? and Guo Wengu? I could go on – I’ve accumulated a lot. You should know though – Peter Strzok isn’t just the golden child of an everyday American family. Its all connected. Enjoy! MAGA ReleaseTheMemo Qanon TheStorm Odd.. Barack Obama is reported to been mentored when in Chicago by the Jesuit Priest Gregory Galluzzo . See [6] Gregory Galluzzo graduated from the Spring Hill College in 1968. 4 years prior, this small college graduated the Jesuit Priest names James Strzok in 1964. James Strzok has been stationed in Kenya for decades, where Obama once lived. [7] James Strzok (or Jim Strzok) initially moved from Wisconsin to Africa in 1986. His early work was in eastern Uganda and Kenya. [8]
…in 1988, two years later, a 26-year old Barack Obama visits Kenya to connect with the roots of his father. He visits Alego, situated on Lake Victoria, his father’s hometown… [9] Bottom line, Jim Strzok and Barrack Obama were aligned to meet around 1988 in Africa. What happens next is more interesting. Barack Obama, who never lived in Chicago, suddenly moves to Chicago in 1988 and is offered a job by a law firm. So here is the question – Did the Jesuit priest James Strzok (uncle of Peter Strzok) “discover” Barack Obama in 1988? There is only circumstantial evidence, but there are enough clues to warrant asking the question. Think! Years later, Peter Strzok II , nephew of James Strzok, rockets right up to the top of the FBI , and becomes the top “get it done” guy for Obama and Hillary Clinton to destroy evidence and impact investigations … And Andrew McCabe and Strzok are best buds. And General James Cartwright, who is essentially a brother-in-law through marriage to James Strzok , becomes Obama’s favorite and most trusted person who he worked with – Obama truly likes Cartwright. [EDITOR NOTE: Obama’s last pardon in office was guess who???] [10] In August and September of 2015, Peter Strzok was one busy beaver also requesting ALL HRC email copy under control of DOE, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NSA, National coutnerterrorism center, Director of National Intelligence, DOJ, NSA, and US Treasury. Has anyone seen the content of any of these HRC email requests by Peter Strzok? Anyone? Mueller? Mueller? Not me. Maybe they got lost in a glitch. Maybe somebody should ask @DevinNunes? @TGowdySC? More reference info for @Eric_reality on Melissa Hodgman: The actual appointment was Oct 14 2016 upon completion of the “investigation” of HRC emails. https://209.157.64.200/focus/f-chat/3610885/posts Good videos today from @GeorgWebb – We are now seeing how Peter Strzok Sr (not the Jr – Sr…) and his 50 yrs experience w/ #IranContra / #uranium / #Russia make him an important person: James Strzok S.J. took the last aerial photograph as the Campion Jesuit HS campus, Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin. Observe – he is into photography. [11] James Strzok S.J. is also a noted photographer of Jesuits 2012 East Africa book – See… [12] First, correction from earlier… Barack Obama was in Chicago in 1985, and visited Kenya in 1987… or 1988.. So Obama was already well known by Gregory Galluzzo before his travels. [13] But that begs the question – Who would Obama have known in western Kenya in 1987 (or 1988.. the time of his visit is up for debate) who would have been such a good photographer? Or have access to video recording equipment? See… Or do portraits? This is all just speculation .. But you wont find this high-quality video of the preceding weeks in Europe. Anywho… A Strzok family tree shows siblings of Peter Strzok Sr (father of Peter Strzok II). [14] The internet has been well scrubbed of information regarding the siblings of James Cartwright, but legal papers on Politico mention he has 5 younger sisters: [15] Why General Cartwright leaked still doesnt quite makes sense to me. All I know is that Hillary Clinton didn’t like it, so it was probably a good thing. If you haven’t seen Zero Days, now is a good time – [16] Walking away from this for now. There are probably mistakes so please correct. Peter Strzok walked into my company, impacted my life, not the other way around. Apologies for any false suggestions. The lost texts + emails are a big deal. America needs them. In addition to @RepAdamSchiff having a Russian grandfather and @SenFeinstein having multiple Russian grandparents, would it be crazy to also consider that Peter Strzok is of Polish and Russian ancestry? Say hello to the Polnaszeks. Why are members of the extended Strzok family spending extra time at Facebook HQ in Menlo Park California? Not Peter Strzok, but I won’t say who. How many people have relatives who get to move around nuclear reactors? We are hunting for the #StrzokPageTexts for August, September, and October 2015. That is when some serious action happened. Send me a DM.
Anybody notice the bizarre sinister look in Peter Strozk’s eyes? He looks almost demonic. Really really strange.
In the following article/video, Maria Batrimono references the article from the Wall Street Journal that I posted above in post #1261 in case you missed it. BARTIROMO: Welcome back. Special counsel Robert Mueller indicting 12 Russian intelligence officers, accusing them of hacking the DNC and the Clinton campaign in order to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, this as President Trump is gearing up to meet face-to-face with Russian President Vladimir Putin tomorrow in Helsinki. Joining me right now to talk about all of the above, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes. Mr. Chairman, it's always a pleasure to see you. REP. DEVIN NUNES, R-CALIFORNIA: It's great to be here live. I'm not coming from California. (LAUGHTER) BARTIROMO: I know. I'm happy. NUNES: It looks so different. BARTIROMO: It's great that you're on set. So thank you very much. These Russian indictments, we could have known about them earlier this year, when you actually came out with your report back in -- back in March, and then the findings released to the public at the end of April. I have got the report right in front of me. Your reaction to these indictments? NUNES: Well, we knew about this a year-and-a-half ago. Almost everything in the -- in the indictment, we knew about. In -- March 22, we released our findings that you have in front of you right there. Those findings were available March 22. If you remember, the media mocked us. BARTIROMO: Yes, I do remember. NUNES: They made fun of the Republicans. They said it was a whitewash. The Democrats said it was a whitewash. Nearly everything the Democrats said about our report was that it was a whitewash. Then we had to fight with the intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice, so that they wouldn't redact and they would declassify our report. That was finished in April. So, this entire report that you have in front of you, including -- all you had to do was get page four, and you only had to read chapter two, and you would have had nearly everything that's in the indictment. BARTIROMO: That is pretty incredible. Look at all these redactions that you can actually see on the screen. NUNES: And it's page after page of that. (LAUGHTER) NUNES: And, actually, there's more in this report. BARTIROMO: Yes. NUNES: Than what's in the indictment, OK? And this is what -- this is what's very frustrating. So -- so, it's great that they indicted Russians. Yes, they did bad things. I mean, they're always up to bad things. We know that. They have very sophisticated intelligence capabilities in Russia. And they are always -- they are constantly attacking the United States and our allies. However, in the indictment, they leave out some really important people that they also went after. So, the indictment plays like they're only going after the Democrats, when Bob Mueller and all his investigators and his lawyers know for a fact that they also targeted Republicans. Why is that not in the indictment? It makes the indictment look ridiculous. BARTIROMO: OK. So. (CROSSTALK) NUNES: Now, I'm not saying they shouldn't be indicted. I'm just saying that. BARTIROMO: That the Russians were targeting both Democrats and Republicans. NUNES: And Republicans. BARTIROMO: Yes. NUNES: And they know that. It's in our report. So why doesn't the -- why doesn't Department of Justice allow this to be declassified, so the American public can see this? BARTIROMO: The other thing is that these people are never going to see justice, right? I mean, we don't have jurisdiction over these -- these people. They're not going to come to the U.S. And so they really won't actually be held accountable. NUNES: Right. They're intelligence officers, so they're not going to be held accountable. It doesn't mean, though, that we shouldn't call out Russia for attacking our -- conducting cyber-attacks on our system. BARTIROMO: But the timing of this, I mean, they -- they released this right after the Peter Strzok hearing. And your point is, we knew all of this year ago. Why is now the time to make these arrests, and not a year ago, when you actually had the information? continued...
continued from above... NUNES: Well, I have to call into question. You knew about this a year- and-a-half ago. You for sure knew it because you got our report. So you for sure knew it by March and April of this year. And then it looks like all you did, all the Mueller did was validate our report, indict some Russians, and leave out, I think, some very pertinent, relative of -- evidence that the American public should see, which is why we continue to have to fight. This report has been mocked by the media, has been mocked by the Democrats, and still is mostly redacted by the Department of Justice and the intelligence agencies. BARTIROMO: And all of these redactions really underline a common theme. And that has been obstruction on the left. You look at that Peter Strzok trial last -- Peter Strzok hearing, rather, last week. And there was so much obstruction on the Democrats. They were trying to change the subject. They -- they were trying to stop the questioning of what went on during the 2016 election. So, how are you going to get the information, when you see you're in a catch-22 situation? Because every time -- you want to know why the Trump collusion investigation launched in the first place. But when you ask that question of Peter Strzok or anybody else in the FBI, they're going to say, we can't talk about it because it's an active investigation. And it is, by the special counsel. NUNES: Yes. So there's -- so, there's a couple points, I think, that are important. So, we have add before July 31 of 2016, we have asked the Department of Justice for months and months and months -- I have said on your show -- did you run informants? How many informants did you have before the investigation was even open? How much did you pay these informants to run into Trump campaign or officials or associates? Because the Department of Justice is trying to say -- and the FBI -- that they didn't do anything until after July 31. So that's -- we're still waiting on that information. I think that is really important information the American people should know. The second biggest problem we have is that the president of the United States has got to declassify this. Why was -- if the president of the United States would have declassified this -- if you go through page after page after page of this, OK, the Mueller indictment would look ridiculous today, if this was redacted -- if this was unredacted and declassified. BARTIROMO: Yes. Well, you know what? Because there is a big portion of the country that will say, oh, he's trying to get in the middle of an investigation, which is why I asked the president two weeks ago, when I sat down with him in that exclusive interview with President Trump, whether or not he's going to declassify these documents. Listen to this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BARTIROMO: Why don't you just direct your subordinates to get those documents over to Congress? Are you going to do it? DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The one thing I want to stay uninvolved in, at least for now -- I may get involved. BARTIROMO: OK. TRUMP: But I've been told by so many people, don't get involved. You know, all those people got involved. BARTIROMO: Congress wants those documents. TRUMP: It's not good. And they'll get the documents, and it's getting, and they're getting them. (END VIDEO CLIP) BARTIROMO: Meanwhile, there an op-ed in this weekend's Wall Street Journal. And the title is, "After the Strzok Stone Wall," basically saying, we're obviously not going to get to the truth through the legal process. The president has got to declassify. Do you think he will do it? NUNES: Well, I think he has to. And I think this is a great example of it. It's not just about Strzok. It's not just about the FISA. Now you have information in our report here that he should have already declassified. And I think then the American people would have known. I mean, we basically wrote the indictment for Mueller. The House Republicans, without the support of the Democrats, wrote the indictment for the Mueller special counsel, essentially, and information that we have had for over a year. So, now you have Strzok, who's -- who is stonewalling Congress, not answering questions, looks very foolish. You add on to the fact that you still have the FISA that is sitting out there that should be declassified, so the American public can see it, because what is consistent in all of this investigation for a year-and-a-half? House Republicans come out and say something, and then we get attacked by the mainstream media, mocked by the mainstream media and the Democrats. But every time, when the truth eventually comes out, we're proven right. And we will be proven right again if the FISA -- majority of the FISA is declassified, so the American public can make up their mind, were the counterintelligence agencies abused by the Obama administration or were they not? BARTIROMO: Yes. And, at this point, we have got, what, 25 or 26 Russians that have been indicted, the number of Russians colluding with -- with Donald Trump, zero, five Americans indicted, four of them for lying to the FBI, and Manafort for a 20-year-old bank fraud. So there are reports today that the special counsel is looking to wrap this up by the end of the summer. Do you believe that? NUNES: I don't believe it. I mean, they look -- I hope that's the case, but they look way too political to me, because every time it seems like something comes out, Strzok or -- or, before that, we had when the FISA stuff came out, the special counsel always seems to be reactive to try to, I think, create narratives. And maybe that's not the case, but it sure looks like the case. BARTIROMO: So, where does your investigation stand now into the State Department and into really how this launch took place of the Trump-Russia probe? NUNES: We are -- we are waiting on the Department of Justice to give us that information before July 31, which, for week after week after week, they continue not to do it. They did provide a lot of documents that are -- that are aiding us in our investigation. And then we have kicked over 42 names. Strzok and Page are two of those 42 names. BARTIROMO: But, also, Glenn Simpson is on that list. NUNES: Yes. So, there's -- and those, we kicked to the task force from the Oversight Committee. And Mr. Ratcliffe is on this task force. We need these people interviewed on camera as soon as possible. BARTIROMO: Real quick, before you go, let me -- let me ask you in terms of what happens now and whether or not you think we're going to see accountability here. NUNES: I think you only see accountability if there is either a second special counsel that investigates all of this or there is somebody that is outside of the leadership of the Department of Justice who can run a -- a real investigation abuse of power and other issues. BARTIROMO: What should the president ask or speak to Putin about? NUNES: Well, the president has to be tough. Well, number one, I would say, don't hand a reset button over, like Hillary Clinton did. BARTIROMO: Yes, the big. (CROSSTALK) NUNES: That's number one. (LAUGHTER) NUNES: Number two, what he's doing with Europe and NATO is what's needed to be done for a long time, which is, one, pay your fair share. And, two, we cannot allow Eastern Europe to rely on German -- on Russian gas. The Germans are building pipelines, getting Russian gas, feeding the Russian beast, right, while the Germans are only paying 1.3 percent. BARTIROMO: Yes. NUNES: So, I laugh about all these people who are saying that Trump shouldn't meet with Putin. Trump has done more on the highest issues at the most important level, pointing them out to the Europeans and us, and the American people, that you have got to stop buying gas from Russians and you have to beef up defense in Poland, Romania and the Baltics. That's what needs to happen. And only by force, brute force will Putin understand anything. BARTIROMO: And. NUNES: And we should give the president the room to do that. BARTIROMO: And you would imagine that this -- obviously, these indictments are brought up as well. NUNES: Yes, I would guess. But -- but that's -- it's -- it's just ridiculous. BARTIROMO: Mr. Chairman, it's really good to see you this morning. NUNES: Nice to see in person. BARTIROMO: Thank you so much for joining us. http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2...ctment-russians-leaves-out-targeting-gop.html Yep. Trey Gowdy's opening statements were terrific imho, https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/201...illbillies-in-the-countrys-wealthiest-county/ https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2018...-stop-it-text-he-doesnt-recall-writing-video/ The following articles from the American Thinker are pretty good, Strzok, the FBI, and Bias We Cannot Allow Strzokians Back into Power The Racist Left
The cousin then Senator Obama illegally campaigned for in Kenya.....Odinga....violating the Logan Act: Obama's Kenya ghosts About 50 parishioners were locked into the Assemblies of God church before it was set ablaze. They were mostly women and children. Those who tried to flee were hacked to death by machete-wielding members of a mob numbering 2,000. The 2008 New Year Day atrocity in the Kenyan village Eldoret, about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi, had all the markings of the Rwanda genocide of a decade earlier. By mid-February 2008, more than 1,500 Kenyans were killed. Many were slain by machete-armed attackers. More than 500,000 were displaced by the religious strife. Villages lay in ruin. Many of the atrocities were perpetrated by Muslims against Christians. The violence was led by supporters of Raila Odinga, the opposition leader who lost the Dec. 27, 2007, presidential election by more than 230,000 votes. Odinga supporters began the genocide hours after the final election results were announced Dec. 30. Mr. Odinga was a member of Parliament representing an area in western Kenya, heavily populated by the Luo tribe, and the birthplace of Barack Obama’s father. Mr. Odinga had the backing of Kenya’s Muslim community heading into the election. For months he denied any ties to Muslim leaders, but fell silent when Sheik Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, appeared on Kenya television displaying a memorandum of understanding signed on Aug. 29, 2007, by Mr. Odinga and the Muslim leader. Mr. Odinga then denied his denials. The details of the MOU were shocking. In return for Muslim backing, Mr. Odinga promised to impose a number of measures favored by Muslims if he were elected president. Among these were recognition of “Islam as the only true religion,” Islamic leaders would have an “oversight role to monitor activities of ALL other religions [emphasis in original],” installation of Shariah courts in every jurisdiction, a ban on Christian preaching, replacement of the police commissioner who “allowed himself to be used by heathens and Zionists,” adoption of a women’s dress code, and bans on alcohol and pork. This was not Mr. Odinga’s first brush with notoriety. Like his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, the main opposition leader in the 1960s and 1970s, Raila Odinga is a Marxist He graduated from East Germany’s Magdeburg University in 1970 on a scholarship provided by the East German government. He named his oldest son after Fidel Castro. Raila Odinga was implicated in the bloody coup attempt in 1982 against then-President Daniel Arap Moi, a close ally of the United States. Kenya has been one of the most stable democracies in Africa since the 1960s. The ethnic cleansing earlier this year was the worst violence in Kenya since that 1982 coup attempt. Mr. Odinga spent eight years in prison. At the time, he denied guilt but later detailed he was a coup leader in his 2006 biography. Statute of limitations precluded further prosecution when the biography appeared. Initially, Mr. Odinga was not the favored opposition candidate to stand in the 2007 election against President Mwai Kibaki, who was seeking his second term. However, he received a tremendous boost when Sen. Barack Obama arrived in Kenya in August 2006 to campaign on his behalf. Mr. Obama denies that supporting Mr. Odinga was the intention of his trip, but his actions and local media reports tell otherwise. Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced. “Kenyans are now yearning for change,” he declared. The intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks and actions was transparent to Kenyans - he was firmly behind Mr. Odinga. Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama had met several times before the 2006 trip. Reports indicate Mr. Odinga visited Mr. Obama during trips to the U.S. in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Mr. Obama sent his foreign policy adviser Mark Lippert to Kenya in early 2006 to coordinate his summer visit. Mr. Obama’s August trip coincided with strategizing by Orange Democratic Movement leaders to defeat Mr. Kibaki in the upcoming elections. Mr. Odinga represented the ODM ticket in the presidential race. Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama’s fathers were both from the Luo community, the second-largest tribe in Kenya, but their ties run much deeper. Mr. Odinga told a stunned BBC Radio interviewer the reason why he and Mr. Obama were staying in near daily telephone contact was because they were cousins. In a Jan. 8, 2008, interview, Mr. Odinga said Mr. Obama had called him twice the day before while campaigning in the New Hampshire primary before adding, “Barack Obama’s father is my maternal uncle.” President Kibaki requested a meeting of all opposition leaders in early January in an effort to quell the violence. All agreed to attend except Mr. Odinga. A month later, Mr. Kibaki offered Mr. Odinga the role of prime minister, the de facto No. 2 in the Kenyan government, in return for an end to the attacks. Mr. Odinga was sworn in on April 17, 2008. Mr. Obama’s judgment is seriously called into question when he backs an official with troubling ties to Muslim extremists and whose supporters practice ethnic cleansing and genocide. It was Islamic extremists in Kenya who bombed the U.S. Embassy in 1998, killing more than 200 and injuring thousands. None of this has dissuaded Mr. Obama from maintaining disturbing loyalties. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/
These people unleashed are getting rather scary! Democrat Activist Calls for Hillary Clinton to ‘Take Over ‘ Presidency in Wake of Trump-Putin Summit Democrats are growing increasingly hysterical over President Donald Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin Monday. Some protested outside the White House Monday night when Trump returned, while others, like Scott Dworkin, called for the removal of Trump and Vice President Mike Pence from office and for defeated 2016 Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to “take over”. Dworkin describes himself on Twitter, “Co-Founder @TheDemCoalition. #DworkinReport podcast host. #AMJoy on MSNBC Contributor. Proud member of #TheResistance. Helped uncover #TrumpRussia scandal.” The Democratic Coalition’s about on Twitter reads, “The nation’s largest grassroots Resistance organization. We campaign for Democrats, investigate Trump/GOP and we fight foreign influence. #TheResistance” Dworkin has 359,000 followers on Twitter, the Democratic Coalition has 163,000 followers. Dworkin posted Monday night, “Trump and Pence should be removed from office and we should either have a new election, or Hillary Clinton should take over. That’s how we beat Putin. There is no other way. #ImpeachTrump” Video and twitter descriptions of protest: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ver-presidency-in-wake-of-trump-putin-summit/
Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign Vladimir Putin made a bombshell claim during Monday's joint press conference with President Trump in Helsinki, Finland, when the Russian President said some $400 million in illegally earned profits was funneled to the Clinton campaign by associates of American-born British financier Bill Browder - at one time the largest foreign portfolio investors in Russia. The scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community, said Putin, who he said "accompanied and guided these transactions." Browder made billions in Russia during the 90's. In December, a Moscow court sentenced Browder in absentia to nine years in prison for tax fraud, while he was also found guilty of tax evasion in a separate 2013 case. Putin accused Browder's associates of illegally earning over than $1.5 billion without paying Russian taxes, before sending $400 million to Clinton. After offering to allow special counsel Robert Mueller's team to come to Russia for their investigation - as long as there was a reciprocal arrangement for Russian intelligence to investigate in the U.S., Putin said this: For instance, we can bring up Mr. Browder, in this particular case. Business associates of Mr. Browder have earned over $1.5 billion in Russia and never paid any taxes neither in Russia or the United States and yet the money escaped the country. They were transferred to the United States. They sent [a] huge amount of money, $400,000,000, as a contribution to the campaign of Hillary Clinton. Well that’s their personal case. It might have been legal, the contribution itself but the way the money was earned was illegal. So we have solid reason to believe that some [US] intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions. So we have an interest in questioning them. ........ Browder, a media favorite who self-promotes as “Putin’s enemy #1,” portrays himself as a selfless human rights advocate, but is he? He has used his fortune to threaten lawsuits for anyone who challenges his version of events, effectively silencing many critics. He claims that his accountant Sergei Magnitsky was a crusading "lawyer" who discovered a $230 million tax-fraud scheme that involved the Browder business interest Hermitage Capital but was, in fact, engineered by corrupt Russian police officers who arrested Magnitsky and enabled his death in a Russian jail. Many have been skeptical of the Browder narrative, suspecting that the fraud was in fact concocted by Browder and his accountant Magnitsky. A Russian court recently supported that alternative narrative, ruling in late December that Browder had deliberately bankrupted his company and engaged in tax evasion. He was sentenced to nine years prison in absentia. William Browder is again in the news recently in connection with testimony related to Russiagate. On December 16th Senator Diane Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee released the transcript of the testimony provided by Glenn Simpson, founder of Fusion GPS. According to James Carden, Browder was mentioned 50 times, but the repeated citations apparently did not merit inclusion in media coverage of the story by the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico. ........Fusion GPS, which was involved in the research producing the Steele Dossier used to discredit Donald Trump, was also retained to provide investigative services relating to a lawsuit in New York City involving a Russian company called Prevezon. As information provided by Browder was the basis of the lawsuit, his company and business practices while in Russia became part of the investigation. Simmons maintained that Browder proved to be somewhat evasive and his accounts of his activities were inconsistent. He claimed never to visit the United States and not own property or do business there, all of which were untrue, to include his ownership through a shell company of a $10 million house in Aspen Colorado. He repeatedly ran away, literally, from attempts to subpoena him so he would have to testify under oath. Per Simmons, in Russia, Browder used shell companies locally and also worldwide to avoid taxes and conceal ownership, suggesting that he was likely one of many corrupt businessmen operating in what was a wild west business environment. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...-agents-funneled-400-million-clinton-campaign
What’s even scarier is that RINO sellouts like Paul Ryan are going along with the demonic “Russian collusion” narrative. Barring some miracle, I feel the Deep State is about to make a move against Trump
Trump Calls Off Cold War II By Patrick J. Buchanan Beginning his joint press conference with Vladimir Putin, President Trump declared that U.S. relations with Russia have “never been worse.” He then added pointedly, that just changed “about four hours ago.” It certainly did. With his remarks in Helsinki and at the NATO summit in Brussels, Trump has signaled a historic shift in U.S. foreign policy that may determine the future of this nation and the fate of his presidency. He has rejected the fundamental premises of American foreign policy since the end of the Cold War and blamed our wretched relations with Russia, not on Vladimir Putin, but squarely on the U.S. establishment. In a tweet prior to the meeting, Trump indicted the elites of both parties: “Our relationship with Russia has NEVER been worse thanks to many years of U.S. foolishness and stupidity and now, the Rigged Witch Hunt!” Trump thereby repudiated the records and agendas of the neocons and their liberal interventionist allies, as well as the archipelago of War Party think tanks beavering away inside the Beltway. Looking back over the week, from Brussels to Britain to Helsinki, Trump’s message has been clear, consistent and startling. NATO is obsolete. European allies have freeloaded off U.S. defense while rolling up huge trade surpluses at our expense. Those days are over. Europeans are going to stop stealing our markets and start paying for their own defense. And there will be no Cold War II. We are not going to let Putin’s annexation of Crimea or aid to pro-Russian rebels in Ukraine prevent us from working on a rapprochement and a partnership with him, Trump is saying. We are going to negotiate arms treaties and talk out our differences as Ronald Reagan did with Mikhail Gorbachev. Helsinki showed that Trump meant what he said when he declared repeatedly, “Peace with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing.” On Syria, Trump indicated that he and Putin are working with Bibi Netanyahu, who wants all Iranian forces and Iran-backed militias kept far from the Golan Heights. As for U.S. troops in Syria, says Trump, they will be coming out after ISIS is crushed, and we are 98 percent there. That is another underlying message here: America is coming home from foreign wars and will be shedding foreign commitments. Both before and after the Trump-Putin meeting, the cable news coverage was as hostile and hateful toward the president as any this writer has ever seen. The media may not be the “enemy of the people” Trump says they are, but many are implacable enemies of this president. Some wanted Trump to emulate Nikita Khrushchev, who blew up the Paris summit in May 1960 over a failed U.S. intelligence operation — the U-2 spy plane shot down over the Urals just weeks earlier. Khrushchev had demanded that Ike apologize. Ike refused, and Khrushchev exploded. Some media seemed to be hoping for just such a confrontation. When Trump spoke of the “foolishness and stupidity” of the U.S. foreign policy establishment that contributed to this era of animosity in U.S.-Russia relations, what might he have had in mind? Was it the U.S. provocatively moving NATO into Russia’s front yard after the collapse of the USSR? Was it the U.S. invasion of Iraq to strip Saddam Hussein of weapons of mass destruction he did not have that plunged us into endless wars of the Middle East? Was it U.S. support of Syrian rebels determined to oust Bashar Assad, leading to ISIS intervention and a seven-year civil war with half a million dead, a war which Putin eventually entered to save his Syrian ally? Was it George W. Bush’s abrogation of Richard Nixon’s ABM treaty and drive for a missile defense that caused Putin to break out of the Reagan INF treaty and start deploying cruise missiles to counter it? Was it U.S. complicity in the Kiev coup that ousted the elected pro-Russian regime that caused Putin to seize Crimea to hold onto Russia’s Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol? Many Putin actions we condemn were reactions to what we did. Russia annexed Crimea bloodlessly. But did not the U.S. bomb Serbia for 78 days to force Belgrade to surrender her cradle province of Kosovo? How was that more moral than what Putin did in Crimea? If Russian military intelligence hacked into the emails of the DNC, exposing how they stuck it to Bernie Sanders, Trump says he did not collude in it. Is there, after two years, any proof that he did? Trump insists Russian meddling had no effect on the outcome in 2016 and he is not going to allow media obsession with Russiagate to interfere with establishing better relations. Former CIA Director John Brennan rages that, “Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki … was … treasonous. … He is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???” Well, as Patrick Henry said long ago, “If this be treason, make the most of it!” http://buchanan.org/blog/trump-calls-off-cold-war-ii-129662
Browder, Hermitage management fund....the accused mentioned by Putin is now on Varney. Seems to enjoy his notoriety. Thinks he was sent to expose Russia's crimes.
Wants to threaten the President's health it would appear and then disrupt the government to replace Trump with the Commie of his choice. If this were a normal neighborhood there would obviously be multitude of complaints against all of the noise polluters!: Senior Hillary Clinton Adviser Philippe Reines Leads Anti-Trump Protest at White House, Blasts Air Horn at Trump (VIDEO) Hillary Clinton loyalist Philippe Reines, who served as a senior State Department appointee under Clinton and later as campaign adviser for Clinton’s losing 2016 presidential bid, organized a protest at the White House Monday night timed for the return home around 9 p.m. EDT by President Donald Trump from his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland earlier Monday. Reines was joined at the protest by current Hillary political adviser Adam Parkhomenko, who said Trump-hating porn star attorney Michael Avenatti would be at the White House to protest Tuesday night. Reines posted video of himself holding an air horn loudly blaring a siren at the White House. Reines said he would be blasting siren to keep Trump awake. “Hey @realDonaldTrump I’m the guy outside your window blaring this at your window. I’m gonna wait a bit to let you start dozing off. Then the air horns come out. I’ve got two canisters. That’s 24 1-second bursts or 8 3-second bursts. Any preference?” Philippe Reines, on right, Ian” on left, at start of White House protest, image via Twitter. “If someone flew home from Helsinki they’d get back to DC around 9pm. Probably jet lagged. You know what I’d hate if I just got back & needed to sleep? A bunch of people outside my home with bullhorns & air horns.I’ve never started a protest. How does one do that @MoveOn?” Here’s the plan: 8:30pm tonight in Lafayette Park, directly across from the North side of the White House. Please pass this on to anyone who can join or help whip people up. (@MoveOn)” “We have whistles for the 1st 50 to arrive (whistles for recreational use…) and 128 sets of ear plugs. I’m the one on the right in the phone, on the left is Ian. Come find us. And folks this is makeshift. Don’t expect a lot of organization. Definitely in need of chants.” Reines thanks Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) for speaking at the protest, “THANK YOU @JoaquinCastrotx for firing up the crowd’! Means so much to ppl to hear voices like yours. Marine One is on its way. In minutes the Traitor-in-Chief will be serenaded by 600+ ppl with whistles & horns less than 100 yds from his bedroom window. #OccupyLafayetteSquare” Reines vowed to return Tuesday night, “Need 28,000 to describe tonight. But in 280…WOW We. Were. Loud. No way the traitor didn’t try to drown us out with pillows. We are in his head. Special shout out to @JoaquinCastrotx for coming and firing up th crowd. Back at it tomorrow night.” (won't be hard to do with the inside the beltway swamp dwellers) Reines is hoping to make the protest 24/7, “Here are the White House protest rules as explained to us tonight by the Secret Service: Anyone can protest on Pennsylvania Ave, from curb to curb, any time. We used whistles, air horns. All allowed. Anyone can go at 4pm or 4am to bang pots & pans. Maybe 30-minute shifts 24/7?” Media hog and porn star attorney Michael Avenatti is planning to be there Tuesday night, according to Hillary Clinton adviser Adam Parkhomenko, “Exciting news: I just got off the phone with @MichaelAvenatti who is cheering on #OccupyLafayettePark and he’s coming to DC for night two: Tuesday at 7 PM. Spread the word and let’s make sure we build on what’s taking place tonight in a big way tomorrow! #basta” Being that Washington, D.C. and the Beltway suburbs are one of the most liberal parts of the country, they will have no problem turning out a crowd for the duration of the protest. Will Hillary Clinton have the courage show up in person to lead her coup, or will she continue to hide behind her minions like Reines and Parkhomenko? Reines was appointed by Sec. Clinton to be Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Strategic Communicationsunder her during President Barack Obama’s first term. Reines had served as Clinton press secretary during her failed 2008 presidential campaign. In 2016 he served as an adviser, playing the role of Trump in debate prep. Reines posted a video clip of him trying to hug Clinton during a practice run. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...sident-awake-after-arrival-from-putin-summit/
Trump Said Nice Things to Putin – Roosevelt Gave Eastern Europe to Stalin Resulting in At Least 3 Million Murders Liberal elites and Never Trump Republicans blew a gasket following President Donald Trump’s meeting and press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump bashers said never in history had a US president given away so much to a Russian leader. But this shows the complete ignorance of the ruling elites. Former Ambassador William Bullitt wrote in 1948 on how Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt handed over Eastern Europe to Soviet tyrant Joseph Stalin without reservation. This action resulted in the extermination of at least 3 million Eastern Europeans at the hands of Stalin and his communist leaders. At least 3 million eastern Europeans were murdered under the communist regimes in the latter part of the 20th century. Spare us your histrionics. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...alin-resulting-in-at-least-3-million-murders/
Meanwhile the secret service is mostly watching high tech communication for threats....what will they do about blatant, "home grown", suggestive propaganda with a purpose to influence the unbalanced to do their dirty work? Portland Gallery Puts Graphic Depiction of President Trump Being Beheaded on Public Display One Grand Gallery in Portland is facing online backlash after they put up an image of President Donald Trump being brutally assassinated in their store window. The violent graphic is in public view where children will be exposed to it and features the caption “F*ck Trump” below the image of his throat being sliced. The gallery is currently running an exhibit titled “F*ck You, Mr. President” which features art from roughly three dozen artists. The controversial art currently on display in their window has prompted many outraged supporters of the President to call for people to report the gallery to the Secret Service. People have also flooded their Facebook page to leave poor reviews and scold them for their petulance. The gallery currently has a 1.4 star rating on the site. “I saw a painting in your store front window of our president getting his throat slashed. Is Kathy Griffin peddling her “art” here now?? Talk about a great way to ruin my lunch,” a woman named Laura C. commented on the gallery’s Yelp page. “Good luck with selling your hate speech art. I’m pretty sure the kind of people who appreciate it, can’t afford it. Gross!” Other art on display inside the gallery includes a painting of the president with a Hitler mustache and missiles with penises on them. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ident-trump-being-beheaded-on-public-display/
President Trump will be speaking about yesterday's summit with President Putin at 2pm ET today and there will be an interview of President Trump on Tucker Carlson/Fox News at 8pm ET tonight. Here is the interview of President Trump by Sean Hannity from yesterday, Various analyses can be helpful but I'd rather hear things from President Trump directly. We know that is why he uses Twitter so often, to avoid the fake news. Edited to add: Imho the following is a great interview of Rand Paul, I noticed the attendance of four priests at President Trump's rally in Montana, the persecution gets worse everyday...
DJT better show that four dimensional chess game I heered tell of...spill the dirt Mr President. These deep state actors are in merde up to their eyeballs. I guess we better tighten those seatbelts.
