No, another priest I trust implicitly and I cannot name at present. But he has to wait before it comes out.
God has seen this time coming from all eternity. If Jesus knew that at some point, the papacy would be compromised and evil incarnate would sit upon the chair of St. Peter and cause numerous souls to be lost, how then could He say "You are Peter. And upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it"?
I am trying to be very measured in what I say. (I’ve learned how to do that - sort of - the hard way.) But this situation is so grave it should get everybody’s Irish up. And I’m just an ‘Murican kraut. I can’t imagine a real Irishman getting his Irish up, so I’m not going to second guess one.
The ONLY way to square His promises regarding the papacy to the reality of Bergoglio and his heresies is to conclude that Bergoglio was an antipope!! Otherwise the Church has obviously lied to us in its application of Jesus’s words to Peter for 2,000 years. I do NOT believe Christ or His Church has lied to us. Therefore my only option is to believe Bergoglio was an antipope, and that the consequences of that FACT bring into question the validity of the majority of the college of cardinals who “elected” Leo.
Malachi Martin's revelations have proven themselves. He said he read the Third Secret of Fatima. Fatima is in fact church-approved. Fr. Martin spoke of Kiev and Moscow in connection with the chastisement, something unthinkable in his lifetime, but since 2022 these cities are at war with each other. He also spoke of the system trying to get a Pope to resign, so they can replace him with a man of their own. This unique event in history occurred in 2013, fifteen years after Fr. Martin's death. Yes, the solution is praying the holy Rosary. The Blessed Virgin has said so numerous times, in particular in Fatima and Akita. Regarding the Pope, the SSPX takes the approach of "recognise and resist". The first is to avoid schism, the second to avoid heresy. God bless!
We can hear the prophets. For example, St. Francis. Quoting off the cuff: "If people do not repent, God will send a destroyer, a Pope not canonically elected, who will deceive many by the poison of his error". Also, St. Faustina made an interesting diary entry on the very day of the birth of Jorge Bergoglio. Quoting off the cuff: "Tonight I had a dream, and I suffered as I have never suffered before. I pray very hard for priests now."
There's some craic on this forum tonight between this thread and the Aviso News thread! My head is spinning!
The second part of your statement seems to have been confirmed multiple times. John XIII froze when he read the Third Secret, he did not like what he read.
One of the objectives of the Freemasons is to make one of their own 'Pope', according to St. Maximilian Kolbe, who witnessed a demonstration in the Vatican to that effect in 1917. They said, in 100 years, it will be accomplished. If true, this would point to 2017.
I acknowledge it was the next in line, after Pope Leo XIV's removal of Paglia, that has formulated fresh insults against Humane Vite's clear condemnations. Our internet world of instant notification is like a plague that let's the evil genie out of the bottle so quickly. It will take swift condemnation from Pope Leo to correct this diabolical insult. Lord have Mercy. Padraig, it's a huge leap to draw such a stark conclusion so quickly. Let's see if our Pope draws a line in the sand. A retraction is necessary in my mind. Lord have Mercy!
I really appreciate your calm response, and can understand how you've arrived at your point of view. These are such difficult times we're living in. I must pray more and talk less.
I have listened to Malachy Martin and he did indeed seem to put the onus on us the poor sheep to make sure that we were indeed receiving the sacramental life of the Church. For example, he said it was up to us to make a judgement on whether the priest celebrating the local Mass actually believed in the Sacrament itself, whether he was confecting the Eucharist with the proper intention, whether he was feeding us spiritually with his sermons etc - and if we had doubts that it was our responsibility to travel to wherever necessary to obtain this sacramentality in the Mass. However, this was not what I believed to be a standard interpretation, and as I say it placed the responsibility on the poor sheep. In the case of even more lofty matters such as the validity of the Pope (!) or of his election, Fr. Kramer, who has a long list of theological letters after his name, has said that even if the majority of Cardinals were not valid (and I am not saying this was the case), such a defect can still be corrected by the Holy Ghost (Spirit) during a Conclave - so that a valid Pope can still be elected in such a situation. That is his considered opinion on the matter. I will try to find the video where he said this ... But far be it for me to get involved in an argument with BrianK.
“Two worm ridden popes” And then chastisement comes. This is actually from the church approved message of La Salette.
What did Bishop Strickland say about our new Pope that is so negative? Just 14 hours ago he gave this interview and he asks us to pray that Pope Leo can lead us to unity. He does not say he is not Pope. What words of Bishop Strickland are you referring to?
That part of the LaSalette message was given in a secret to Melanie Calvat and that part was not approved by the Church. Only the first part, what Our Lady told the two children on the mountain, is approved by the Church.
I believe that is not from the original messages that were approved at La Salette. Remember that Melanie, many years later as an adult, became very erratic and said a lot more very extreme things that did not come from Mary's original messages.
