Yes, he did. And so many of the elect are not aware. They are in denial. The criticisms towards Bishop Strickland were uncalled for. Praying that those of us who speak up don’t receive the same treatment. I pray for Bishop Strickland. I’ve got cousins in Dallas who love him so much. It’s been devastating for the Catholic Texans.
So much for trusting that the Leo XIV Pontificate would prove to be a breath of fresh air. I am deeply grieved that such heterodoxy arises so soon after the conclave's completion. To continue to gut Humane Vitae is now far more grievous than the faulty reassurances provided by wayward priests in the confessionals of the 1970s. This is the Vatican itself! Next thing will be the removal of the judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah from the Book of Genesis! When, O Lord, will you take action to protect the faithful! I am aghast! I do not understand! Lord have Mercy!
They have a period of silence which they will use to impose huge wickedness very quickly . Good people who suppose they must give this devil some kind of chance to impose very great wickedness Rather they should have spoken out at once right from the start , but alas they all appear befuddled and confused When they do at last find their voices it will be far, far, far too late May God forgive them.
I am especially grieved about EWTN and Catholic Unscripted :great heroes of mine But Bishop Strickland is a diamond , God bless him Bishop Strickland is wonderful. Listen to him.
What does Papa Leo do that Papa Frankie did not? They both confirm the Churches teachings over and over again and repeat endlessly that they intend to keep them. But with pure wickedness they both say they can somehow , ' Interpret', our Catholic teachings for the modern world Pure Modernist Heresy Wickedness from the very bowels of hell
Hi Padraig, how is possible for you talking about our new Pope Leo 14 that way ? I do not understand you, I remember that you praised Pope francis for years before changing your mind, the same with the Gospa of Medjugorje to whom you are a devote for years, my friend we know each other for years but here you are wrong to date, no one should talk about a new Pope that way, if he was heretic please be sure that I will know it as well so to my friends in no way this disrespect should be follow, thank you.
We can all see truth for what it is, here. Loudly shouting about "pure evil" and judging people's intentions and heart and entire future papacy, and saying the rest of us have our heads in the sand if we don't also scream about it and judge everything ahead of time, is honestly silly. It's really not what I came to this forum for. Most popes in recent history have made a lot of questionable appointments and said and did things that made people worry, but being super excited to condemn and call others evil is just not something I want to be a part of.
Heresy is wrong. It's not complicated. I know the difference between pure good and evil. Between the Teachings of the Catholic Church and those who, from the Vatican teach the very opposite of the Teachings of the Church I can tell the difference. I AM NOT CONFUSED. I am not puzzled. I am not left wondering. It is just pure evil and heretical. So there you go. But you are correct if this is a place where you do not want to hear these things then you are better going to a place that does not wake you up. Back to take the blue pill, everything's fine,, Stop asking difficult questions. By the way why do you think Bishop Strickland is no longer on utube but only on Rumble? Papa Leo looks nice, he talks nice, he seems nice, he is not Papa Frankie, we wish like crazy he is is nice ; fine. But it doesn't necessarily make it so. These are the exact same things we went through with Papa Frankie when he started out. Frankie is Pope. He is wonderful . Shut up. You are a bad Catholic if you ask questions. Papa Leo Is Pope. He is wonderful. Shut up. You are a bad Catholic if you ask questions. You are not a nice person if you do so. I have been through this all before with Papa Frankie. It is like water of a ducks back to go through it all before. Papa Frankie was an evil heretic. Papa Leo is an evil heretic. Take it or leave it. The Blue Pill, go back to sleep. Or the Red Pill, wake up. All I'm offering you is the truth, nothing more.
How can we explain to Protestants that we simply have another “bad pope” leading the Church, and that this does not affect the indefectibility of the Church? I find this situation exhausting, because I always relied on Fatima as a safeguard against schism, especially due to the revelations Malachi Martin made about the Third Secret — that there would be a heretical pope. But now there are two in a row, with the second one likely to have a long and vigorous reign?? Frankly, this is something very difficult to bear, and the idea of turning to the Orthodox Church becomes tempting. After all, even though they’ve conceded to modernity on the issue of divorce, their synodality has not produced anything like Fiducia Supplicans.
It's very easy to see the evil in others. It's a lot harder to see the evil in ourselves, especially when we are very focused on the former. Do you know what one of the big objectives of the Freemasons was? To get Catholics to openly criticize their own pope. They infiltrated Catholic publications and started slipping more and more criticism in, to get people used to it and then doing it themselves. And now we're so far into it, that we think that screaming accusations from the rooftops 24/7 is actually somehow beneficial, instead of pondering things in our heart like Mary, praying and sacrificing when we see that our Church leaders need conversion, and studying our Faith so we can remain in the Truth and be a beacon to those around us.
Malachi Martin is not a saint, and his "revelations" have not been approved by the Church. I have yet to see any approved apparition stating there will be a heretical, or "anti-pope." The closest I've seen is Mary revealing there will be "cardinals against cardinals, bishops against bishops," and the reason she warned of this was to get us to pray and sacrifice, to atone for our sins and others, to avoid chastisement and bring the world back to God. We have our solution; we know the remedy, because Mary has revealed it to us. Prayer, sacrifice, atonement.
It would be very wrong for a Catholic to criticise or judge a Pope. If I supposed for one second either Papa Frankie or Leo were really Popes I would never dare. But it is impossible to be a Pope and a heretic at the same time. It would be the same as saying light can be dark. A contradiction in terms/ Good can not be evil Lies cannot be true.
To want ,very urgently, everything to be fine after the abomination of Papa Frankie does not mean that you may get it. Papa Leo repeated multiple times that he will follow in the footsteps of the previous abomination.He has kept his word. I give him credit for this. Paderborn Cathedral ,Germany;
We can see now the slippery slope of constant criticism of our superiors, which Jesus has precisely told us not to do. We eventually remove ourselves from the authority God gave them over us and place ourselves outside of the Church. We become our own head, because we know better.
Pope Francis was a manifest grave heretic. That’s well documented now by individuals who had the authority to do so. Pope Benedict did not freely resign. He was coerced by the US deep state using severe financial manipulation. And worse. If his resignation was coerced then it was not a valid resignation. Then the conclave that “elected” Pope Francis was not a valid conclave. IF it was a valid conclave, Pope Francis was still a manifest grave heretic, and by that fact lost the papacy according to some of the Saints and Doctors of the Church. Regardless Bergoglio will be seen in hindsight to have been an antipope or at least a usurper. If indeed he was not a valid pope, his appointments to the college of cardinals were invalid. He appointed 111 of the 138 voting cardinals. So that college’s recent conclave may not have been valid either. In which case Pope Leo was not validly elected. We are in totally uncharted territory in the Church right now, a true period of chastisement. The saints have NOT instructed us how to respond to these uncertainties and the possibility of two back to back “bad popes.” It’s NOT a matter of always “respecting the papacy” if the individual in question is not truly a pope. In fact if it’s doubtful, there is no sin in expressing those doubts according to the saints. How those doubts are expressed may well be uncharitable or sinful. Merely expressing them is not.
I would argue that having personal doubts about it is not sinful. But stating something gravely negative about a person for all to hear, when one is not 100% sure AND has the God-given directive to do so for the good of souls under their charge, is wrong. The Church itself teaches that.
Brian are you referring to Fr Charles Murr? Can you give a link? That is a very serious thing to say about Pope Francis.
