Russia: It Didn't happen UN: Let us send in a coalition of investigators to see Russia: No we will do it ourselves and let you know what we find Yeaaaaa... And Im going to believe Russia, if you have nothing to hide allow the coalition which you can be part of
What was not known until AFTER Mark Taylor's "Trump prophecies"....while it came from decades past....and just as unbelievable at THAT time. And yet whom did God work through to make it public in current times???!! Each has his/her role to play and timing therein. As the good Father begins the video..."in light of current events".....
This is sickening. If Trump wasn't fulfilling the prophecy of shaking the world as the Father intends, then this corrupt group of globalists who've had their personal goals interrupted wouldn't be committing a type of personal suicide. And yet they comply with the prophecy's predictions of exposing and judging the corrupt systems in which they ruled. Results of dealing with the devil for earthly gain only. Prayers for conversions due to justice being done.
No, in fact they are saying it happened and that it was fake. A far bolder accusation which they should offer proof of.
Yes, and the Apostle Paul warned the Corinthians that the workers of iniquity were already at work in their day, which of course we know to be the case. Since these powers plotted to kill Christ for quite some time before actually pulling it off. We then see these mechanizations all throughout history in fact. With the falling away, the fall of France and the decline of the Church. Now we are in a time of great confusion and chaos with the corrupt powers being exposed for the rotting corpses they are. What I am getting at is that we need to be very cautious of attributing to God that which is truly His and not the plans of those who seek to mislead and betray His Chosen. These powers are cunning and take great care in their planning and plots. Remember that God Himself warns us of such a time and a very great delusion which he will allow. To expose those who have not received the Love of Truth and approved of wrongdoing and will be condemned. We must all pray for Wisdom in these matters and stay very close to our Lord and Blessed Mother above ALL things.
Wow. This is quite a diatribe. I’m sorry for my part in triggering it. Truly. Goodness! You can follow Mark Taylor if you wish. You can certainly defend him. Why not? He certainly has an excellent track record and he does give hope. I have turned to him often but I am very uneasy about his comments about the Catholic Church. And I am as a Catholic within my rights to be concerned. The mine field we are crossing is beyond treacherous. Im doing my best to get safely to the other side as I know you are too.Pax my friend.
Nothing personal ever meant. It always appears to be that way when people are just offering information...which just happens to have a human being behind it. I am currently personally embarrassed by the confusion caused by and mostly aimed towards those who've held their Catholic faith and training dear to them....by the current individual in the place of Peter. Now how do you explain such words that can be quoted by those who are traditional in their own denominational's faith and training, serving for them as a basis for at least the Catholic church institutional leadership as now finally matching the prejudices they've held for years? Defective qualities within humanity seem to be "blossoming" these days.....no matter the background of the individual. Why the purification must come for all....since, in the end, we're all brothers and sisters in Christ. The others who don't know certain facts will be handled within God's Mercy since He wishes that all may be saved. Peace to you as well.
But your example is not nearly as specific as the Trump prophecies. Anyone can generalize about what is needed, recognizing current conditions in whatever age, but no one could dream of the most unlikely individual, by name, whom God would choose along with the coming specific events to watch for that would cause the necessary turnaround desired at least in spirit. If the "powers" of evil have switched to backing a return of Christian roots to a nation whose recent history had shown that those same evil powers were seemingly succeeding immensely, then the "disorientation" would seem to be aimed at the evil itself....and not to any continuing success of Satan. Rather all of the stink and rot that is exposing itself publicly now, of the systems, is a sign of the fruits of such an action coming from the good Father having mercy upon those, even if only a remnant, who have seriously called upon His help. And that is given to all those of good will.
The latest is that Russia is apparently putting the blame on Britain. Suppose it occurred to them that since the Brits didn't like poisoning from an outside nation within their own boundaries they might just use them as the instigators this time around. A Russian defence ministry spokesman claims that the Kremlin has 'evidence' that Britain was 'directly involved in organising this provocation' (video) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6047235/russia-accuses-britain-syria-chemical-attack/
Yet another round of ratcheting tensions up to the point that there can simply be no diplomacy. When do you think Pope Francis will head to Russia?
Actually that's a real possibility of a reason....to ask those who may have influence over Assad and chemical attacks on the innocent.....one would expect some type of intervention by a world religious leader on this matter. But who knows at this point.
Discernment is key and history is our guide. I would ponder that what is to come can only come after what we have now is taken out of the way first. As it is being now. Both secular and seemingly as well within the Church. Then, and only then can the real intention and designs and man of sin be revealed. May God have Mercy on us all. I think it is looking more and more possible. This opportunity as well could serve to help bring the Eastern Church and Roman back into unity.
First they say it didn't happen. Then they say no we will investigate it Now they say the "alleged attacked" was done by Great Britain. Credibility is zero. These are monsters who support a regime that gases their own people. Now they admit it happened but great Britain did it? Consistency is zero.
U.S. Says Syria Has Used Chemical Weapons at Least 50 Times During War By RICK GLADSTONE APRIL 13, 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/13/world/middleeast/un-syria-haley-chemical-weapons.html Nikki R. Haley, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, speaks during a Security Council meeting on Syria on Friday. Credit Eduardo Munoz/Reuters The United States accused the Syrian government on Friday of using banned chemical arms at least 50 times since Syria’s civil war began seven years ago — substantially higher than previous official estimates. The accusation, made by the American ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki R. Haley, came during a vitriolic exchange with her Russian counterpart at a meeting of the Security Council, which focused on a suspected chemical weapons assault in a Damascus suburb last week. The United States and its allies have blamed the assault on President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. President Trump has expressed outrage over the deadly assault in the suburb, Douma, and threatened a military response. When that might happen remains unknown. “Let’s be clear: Assad’s most recent use of poison gas against the people of Douma was not his first, second, third, or even 49th use of chemical weapons,” Ms. Haley said. “The United States estimates that Assad has used chemical weapons in the Syrian war at least 50 times. Public estimates are as high as 200.” Using chemical weapons is a war crime, and the Syrian government is not the only actor in the war that has been accused of doing so. Mattis Tries to Put Brakes on Possible Syria Strike, to ‘Keep This From Escalating’ APRIL 12, 2018 Dozens Suffocate in Syria as Government Is Accused of Chemical Attack APRIL 8, 2018 In a Syrian Town, People Started Shouting: ‘Chemicals! Chemicals!’ APRIL 11, 2018 Trump Weighs More Robust Military Strike Against Syria APRIL 10, 2018 “Our president has not yet made a decision about possible action in Syria,” Ms. Haley told the council. “But should the United States and our allies decide to act in Syria, it will be in defense of a principle on which we all agree.” The Russian ambassador, Vasily A. Nebenzya, accused the United States and its allies of reckless Middle East warmongering by threatening Syria with military force. Mr. Nebenzya also said there was no confirmed evidence that chemical weapons had been used in the April 7 Douma attack, and that the United States and its allies had “demonstrated they have no interest in an investigation,” although international chemical weapons inspectors have been sent to Syria to conduct an inquiry. The Russian envoy also asserted that Russia, Mr. Assad’s biggest ally, had done far more than the West to achieve peace in the Syria conflict. He accused Washington of having adopted “a categorical policy to unleash military force against Syria” and contain Russia. continued...
continued from above... Graphic Most Chemical Attacks in Syria Get Little Attention. Here Are 34 Confirmed Cases. A suspected chemical attack this month would be the latest in a long string of confirmed chemical attacks conducted by the Syrian government since 2013. OPEN Graphic Mr. Trump’s threats of a strike on Mr. Assad’s forces, the Russian envoy said, were “unworthy of a permanent member of the Security Council.” Ms. Haley said she was incredulous at Mr. Nebenzya’s defense of the Syrian government and his overall portrayal of events. “I’m in awe of how you say what you say with a straight face,” she told the Russian ambassador. Ms. Haley called the use of chemical weapons in Syria “a violation of all standards of morality.” Referring to the Douma assault, Ms. Haley said: “We know who did this. Our allies know who did this. Russia can complain all it wants about fake news, but no one is buying its lies and its cover-ups.” Her criticism of Russia and Syria was echoed by the envoys of Britain and France, who collectively form the brunt of the Western diplomatic response. Ambassador Karen Pierce of Britain said her government believed Mr. Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons “consistently, persistently, over the past five years.” “The use of chemical weapons cannot be allowed to go unchallenged,” Ms. Pierce said. “We will not sacrifice the international order we have collectively built to the Russian desire to protect its ally at all costs." Ambassador François Delattre of France, which has asserted it has proof of chemical weapons use by Syrian military forces, said Mr. Assad’s government had “reached a point of no return” and that the world must provide a “robust, united and steadfast response.” The number of confirmed chemical weapons assaults in the Syria conflict — and who was responsible for them — is one of the most contentious issues. In 2015 the Security Council established a panel, the Joint Investigative Mechanism, to determine who was carrying out such attacks. It found that Mr. Assad’s forces had conducted at least four, in April 2014, March 2015, March 2016 and April 2017, and that the Islamic State had conducted two, in August 2015 and September 2016. Photo Vasily A. Nebenzya, the Russian ambassador to the United Nations, exchanged harsh words with the American ambassador at a Security Council meeting on Friday. Credit Justin Lane/EPA, via Shutterstock The panel was disbanded last November after Russia disputed its findings of Syrian government responsibility. The council has been unable to agree on a replacement. Another panel, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, established by the United Nations Human Rights Council, has asserted that at least 34 chemical weapons assaults had been committed, by various sides in the conflict, as of January. Human Rights Watch, based on information from seven sources, has put the number at 85 between 2013 and February of this year. Mr. Assad and his allies, Russia and Iran, have denied that Syrian government forces carried out any chemical weapons attacks, including the reported assault in Douma. Political analysts said that regardless of the number of attacks, Ms. Haley’s assertions appeared to be part of a broader Western effort to create the basis for a military strike on Mr. Assad’s forces. “All of this points to an established pattern by the Syrian regime in the conflict,” said Andrew J. Tabler, a Syria scholar at the Washington Institute For Near East Policy. “The justification for a strike is going to be based on this pattern, not just this incident.” Trump administration officials worked on Friday to come up with a strategy for what to do in the event that an American-led military strike against the Syrian government’s suspected chemical weapons facilities and its airfields sparks a retaliation from Russia and Iran. The White House scheduled another meeting Friday afternoon of the president’s top national security advisers, as American officials and their allies in Britain and France, who are expected to join any strike, grappled with how to handle concerns expressed by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis about having a Day 2 strategy ready. American military officials expressed concern during a video conference call about Moscow’s possible reaction to a strike on Syrian facilities — particularly in light of Russian threats to shoot down incoming cruise missiles. During the call, officials also said that it was imperative to take steps to protect American naval destroyers from Russian counterattacks. One destroyer, the Donald Cook, is in the Mediterranean and another, the Porter, has been heading to region. Both could take part in a strike, as a launch for Tomahawk cruise missiles. In addition to preparing for a military counterattack, Mr. Mattis has also said that it is important to prepare for a post-strike propaganda campaign by Syria, Russia and Iran. In particular, Defense Department officials want to be able to present convincing evidence that Mr. Assad’s forces indeed used chemical arms in the Douma assault. Helene Cooper and Thomas Gibbons-Neff contributed reporting.
Assad didn't gas his people, Saddam did and was supplied by the USA. This is a false flag and the chemical weapons come from Turkey. They are framing Assad for a pipeline to go through Israel and then Europe. Genie oil - is stationed already in the Golan Heights. And check out who is behind Genie oil. The same Cheney/Bush buddies including Fox News Murdoch. But it's hush hush. So all this hype and media propaganda swallowed is just for money, oil, and contractors. The war party is back. Gee whiz are the angels in heaven dancing????
I have dim memories of reading a few years ago that a war in Israel would be fought over oil in Israel. I can’t remember where I read it, but at the time, it seemed like an outrageous claim. I sure hope not, but you raise a point.
I saw this article mentioned by a commentor on the Conservative Treehouse Blog .. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/ Not so long ago I might have thought that this Sherlock Justice outfit might be a bit tabloid/Alex Jones .... but not These-Days : "DONALD TRUMP vs. THE NEW COPPERHEADS" http://howtobeyourowndetective.com/2018/04/13/the-donald-and-the-new-copperheads/ GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!
We are striking Syria as we speak. Please pray. I don’t think we realize just how precarious this action is. Thanks
