Harper, he has not been able to evangelize in the Churches in Canada much at all from what I can tell. He has made some events in the US. I think Mark is feeling what many of us are today and that is few are willing to hear. It costs allot to travel and speak and he needsa to break even at the bare minimum. His blogs are stll worth reflecting on and i believe his understanding if these times is spot on. I have printed many of them off to have in a binder for when getting online becomes impossible.
Fatima, I never doubted Mark Mallett's goodwill or dedication. I've been wary of his interpretations at times because he seems too open to some marginal messengers. However, Mark walks the walk, and I am sorry to hear if he has trouble making ends meet. I believe he moved to a farm in an isolated area some years ago with his family, to prepare for what he believes lies ahead. Wasn't he on this forum for a while? I seem to remember that.
Actually Mac, I would say that while there are good reports that there was an attempt to manipulate the final outcome of the Synods - the attempt was frustrated at last. The final relatio of Synod never approved or ok'd communion for divorcees, or active homosexuals, or the use of contraceptives, which is what the manipulators were after. That is why I am puzzled when Kasper, Coccopalmeiro, SHonborn and other cardinals claim it was not the Pope, but the Synod who decided on Amores Latitiea's supposed introduction of communion for remarries divorcees - the final relation did never suggest or approve it, because the reality is the majority of bishops and cardinals of the Church are against it. Which is why the ambiguity of Amores Laetitia was a bombshell,, specially knowing that it reflects a thesis presented by Kasper and the new theology wave in the 1980's consistently rejected by the magisterium of the Church since Saint Paul and the two previous popes specifically, one of them declared a saint by Pope Francis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourt...Assembly_of_the_Synod_of_Bishops#Final_report
Yes, a quick search you can see his debates with theologians and others on the Era of Peace, one he agrees with Father Ianuzzi and others. I have no problem with his choice of seers he favors. His judgement is keen and he uses scripture, papal statements, church teaching and saints revelations along with the prophetic consensus within the alleged and approved prophecy. I think this is what God wants from all of us to know where we are at in this crisis of faith era.
djmoforegon, No, I am not correct. I think that Bruno's visions, if they are from heaven, reveal much, much more than what was shown to the seers at Fatima and at Garabandal. I think it is possible that Bruno's visions include the time of the antichrist and the false prophet but are not exclusive to this time period. At @ the 41min mark the priest states that Bruno was told about the removal of the sacrifice and at @ the 41:30 min mark the priest states that on September 21st, 1988 Bruno states, "What I have dreamed will never happen it is too painful and I hope the Lord will not allow the Pope to deny all the truths of the faith and to put himself in place of God..." Therefore, Padraig and Mac are correct and I apologize for questioning both of them. djmoforgeon, You are correct in what you have stated also though, we of course must stay inside of the Father's house. I think we have a good idea of what is going to happen. When the sacrifice is removed then we will have this Pope who will deny all the truths of the faith and who will put himself in place of God. I pray that we are still a long way off from this because this is the time of the antichrist which will occur 1335 days before the Second Coming which Father Wolfe fully explained in another sermon. But of course, God controls the timing and God's will be done.
I also hope not to see that during our lifetime, but I am afraid that without divine intervention, it is reasonably possible that the next pope would be that one - all the pieces for that to happen are coming together very evidently. Padre Pio confirmed the same to Fr Amorth (and confirmed that it was that which the Fatima message contained), as we know today by Amorht's own testimony that it was supposed to happen 'soon' and Padre Pio died in the late 60s! If God allows something like that to happen, it is for a reason, just like he allowed St Peter to deny, and we will be fine as long as we stay inside the Church, with Jesus's Mother and the faithful 'apostles' and 'disciples' during the worst part of the storm. Regards the removal of the sacrifice, I am one who believes that is not going to happen in our times.
Let's not forget that Bruno saw this in a dream. Anything could have been the instigator of that dream, including Bruno's own anxiety about the state of the Church.
If alleged prophecy of this time is credible, which I believe more than a few are, it speaks of the Antichrist in the very near future. When one looks at the state of the world, (the great apostasy in full view, sodomy with universal rights, fornication and divorce and remarriage being endorsed with the highest offices within the church) and one looks at the means of controlling the world in era of not being able to buy, sell or trade via the microchip, these are all bold signs the Antichrist is highly probable he could enter into the visible view very soon. A global currency collapse, global nuclear war or major solar events causing an number of natural disasters would be ripe for the Antichrist that several prophecies today speak of. The Divine Warning will also set the stage for the AC, as it will clearly define the weeds from the wheat and after this takes place there will be the entrance of the AC.
Jarg, If you have the time you may be interested in 2 more videos from Father Wolfe, these are on the end times, https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...8937FBB05002D43820488937FBB05002D&FORM=VRDGAR https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...53542E882A5DF312F8EF53542E882A5DF&FORM=VRDGAR I think that the church teaches that when the sacrifice is removed this is when the man of perdition, the antichrist, is revealed and then there will be 1335 days until the Second Coming. I pretty certain that these videos confirm this and this appears to be a reasonable interpretation of Daniel 12.
Dolours, You make a very good point and this could be the reason why the articles posted about Tre Fontane do not mention this. I need another book, one that contains all of Bruno Cornacchiola's visions and locutions.
The thought occurred to me today that the people of this world are almost ready for the AC They are massing together exponentially And their thinking is controlled
I can't argue too much with your conclusion, but I don't necessarily think the dual warnings of Pope Francis at the end of the 2014 Synod were a put-on. I tend to believe something subsequently irked him that caused him to exclusively hop on the "rigidity" bandwagon. I don't think we'll ever find out. Safe in the Refuge of the Immaculate Heart!
I still think that when the tide turns against the Church, Pope Francis will repent and be given the grace to see his errors and those of this friends. Like so many progressives, they mean well, but their minds have been twisted by feel-good theology and false mercy. He will see what this has brought the Church and that relativism is evil, but it will be to late for the Church.
According to the article linked (by Mac?) on the other thread and which you very kindly reproduced on this thread, it's quoted from Bruno's diaries in Saverio Gaeta's book "The Seer: The Secret of the Three Fountains" "That of 21 September 1988 is the most interesting: "What I dreamed I wish never come true, it is too painful and I hope that the Lord will not allow the Pope to deny any truth of faith and put himself in place of God. How much pain I felt during the night, my legs were getting paralyzed and I could not move, for the pain I felt in looking at the Church reduced to a pile of ruins "(op. cit., p. 218)."
Where that dream is concerned, I think you would need to see the actual diary. Fr.'s sermon says "deny all truths of the faith". Gaeta's book says "deny any truth of faith". If Gaeta's quote is accurate, we aren't too far from that point. It seems that truths of the faith are changeable these days because the Apostles didn't have tape recorders, Christians invented Satan, the Gospel tells us that it's God who needs us, non-marriage has the grace of marriage, adultery isn't really adultery if it's for the sake of the children, and a she who was a he is now a she. That's if you're a Jesuit or believe the Jesuits have had some new divine revelation which had been hidden for 2,000 years. The rest of us are rigid, unmerciful, pharasaical fundamentalists. It all feels like a lose, lose situation whichever way we turn. Why is prayer so difficult at times when it is so vital?
I know. When nothing else seems to come, the Fatima Prayer and Sister Maria Consolata's littlest way prayer Jesus, Mary, I love You! Save souls! come easiest.
On the one hand I think it is only fair to point out that this not necessarily mean the Pope who is indicated is Pope Francis himself , it could be any future Pope. (Though personally I believe it was Pope Francis it fits perfectly) On the theme that Bruno could have been right at the original apparition (s) which appear to have had had the support of Pope Pius x11 himself. Jesus said a good tree gives forth good fruit and a bad tree bad fruit. To wrongly suggest that a future Pope might deny some or all of the fruits of the Faith strikes me as something truly wicked and a horrible misrepresentation of the future if it were false. It also , if it were false means the original apparition must be called into the severest question. Just as if a person appears to be telling the truth one moment and clearly speaking falsehood the next you would dismiss all that they said as undependable as they are clearly liars. Either we buy into it all or we buy into none. No good tree bears bad fruit. Considering the present Pontiff's history I have no difficulty whatsoever in believing him to be the guy referred to, that Bruno was right in what he said all those years ago. Luke 6:43 "No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit.
