Well CD I'm not completely au faitwith your political system but what I have been told is that the confirmation of the electoral college seals the deal.
Thanks, Mac. As I said in one of my very first posts here, the fact that Charlie does a lot of asserting - state a fact or belief confidently and forcefully. synonyms: declare, maintain, contend, argue, state, claim, propound, proclaim, announce, pronounce, swear, insist, avow; More formal aver, opine; rare asseverate cause others to recognize (one's authority or a right) by confident and forceful behavior. synonyms: insist on, stand up for, uphold, defend, contend, establish, press for, push for, stress - and expecting us to take him at face value - without a judgement from the Archdiocese of Denver - bothers me and a few others here.
Obama still has to move out of the white house, get on a helicopter and fly away, and then Trump enters the white house. That is the peaceful transfer of power we have here. That will happen at inauguration when Trump is sworn in. That is why people are focuses on January 20. Until then, Obama holds all his presidential power.
Cheers PS. I suppose my basic point was the fact that Trump has in fact been officially confirmed the 45th president.
Can it also be or is it too late that if people turn back to the God and the Church that all this can be stopped through prayer. Is it still possible or are we way too late. ??????
No it is not. It is not Jan 20 and he is talking about a possible march on Washington DC because power will not be transferred.
Kinda clear what is recommended to followers of CJ. But they will take no notice. Archbishop Samuel J. Aquila of Denver has decided to strongly advise the faithful to exercise prudence and caution in regards to Mr. Charlie Johnston’s alleged divine visions and messages. For those who are disappointed by this finding, the archdiocese encourages them to seek their security in Jesus Christ, the sacraments, and the Scriptures. Some members here exercising little prudence or caution. And seeking security in his messages.
“I know now that true charity consists in bearing all our neighbours' defects--not being surprised at their weakness, but edified at their smallest virtues.” ― Thérèse de Lisieux
That's even more pronounced at his site. One calls him "papa Charlie". (I almost fell off my chair the first time I read that... ) We should be calling Someone Else Papa!
Hello! I just signed up here. I saw this about Charlie Johnston. I want to ask why, people are so angry? If he is of God than God will let us know. I saw someone asked what he said in the past that came true? People who like Charlie should answer that question in my opinion.
Welcome Christy. Can you point us to some of these "angry" people? Surely you aren't contending that questioning self proclaimed seers makes people angry, are you? Honestly, the only responses on this thread that fit the "angry" category in my mind are those that seem to be personally offended when others question the validity of Charlie. Are you seriously trying to equate judging the state of one's soul to discernment of self proclaimed seers? ... No one here is "judging" in the way Mother Teresa is talking about.
Hello, again! I didn't mean to cause trouble. I thought the talk about "ignore" was angry? I maybe got that wrong? I have not read everything.
OK, what I want to say is Charlie is telling his people to get ready to walk to Washington but he doesn't say what will happen when they get there, or how the government will feel about millions of men marching. This doesn't sound like it is well-planned? Who organizes routes, gets permits from police, books hotel rooms and hire nurses to help people hurt on the way? Also, I don't think people are comfortable to as questions because there are some mean talk about some individuals who others want to have ignored. If we are really a month away from a total collapse of the government, it is crazy for Charlie not giving answers to what to do next. He should be more open and available?! Charlie's followers should try to bring all people closer, not argue with other people. Also, he should answer questions on what he has done right in the past so people can decide if he is meant to be a leader of the United States or if he is a con man. Charlie is not in the bible and he doesn't claim to be any of the prophets we have been told to appear in the End Times. I think the End Times are the same as "The Storm" that you are talking about, right? Since he has not been mentioned by the Blessed MOther as someone who is to come, he has to explain himself and tell his story. FatimaPilgrim says Charlie puts people off by being gruff and that is not helpful! Why to trust him? It is now less than a month until the Inauguration. Charlie 's followers have to start acting like leaders and help people, not make fun of people if they don't love Charlie the way they love Charlie. Charlie should stop talking about how government committees as doing things because they are not important anymore. He should only work on stopping the Collapse/Storm. He wastes time writing on unimportant things. I have many doubts about Charlie and his angels. I would like a leader for us but I do not know if it is Charlie. He should answer people's question and not be mean.
Christy, Charlie J is not in the Bible just as much of what we talk about here! When it comes to "matters" not within the Bible/Magisterium ya have: Approved by the Church (worthy of belief) apparitions, seers ... whatever ... it is left to the individual to believe or not. When it comes to not approved ... whatever ... the Church sez Be Careful. The Church may condemn a "whatever" which means avoid. Charlie is in the "Be Careful" area. So ... have a Merry Christmas and don't be "mean" to Charlie believers ... or Garabandal believers .... or Akita believers ... or ... Medjugorje Believers ..... Got It!!!?? GOD SAVE ALL HERE!! View attachment 5865
I really do not believe that Christy is being mean at all here, I do believe he is very correct to be careful. I do not understand why people become so irritated if someone has an opinion that differs from there's. Read it and if you don't like it move on, he hasn't been nasty or slandered anyone he has just said what he feels and believes caution is needed, as we have been told from above also to be cautious. If he has it wrong I'm sure he will deal with it and get with the programme as I'm sure we all will. But this wagging of fingers and trying to put others their place (as certain people believe that's what they are doing here) is ridiculous, it is off putting to new members as that is not what this site is about I'm sure. We can all express ourselves we are not all going to agree but we will all learn something from each other here, so instead of "putting people in their place" take something good from them, move on and express your own thoughts is a gracious non condescending way. Now I would like to leave you all on a very good note you all have something to offer I appreciate all your thoughts as many others do here also. I take something away with me from everything I read here I agree and disagree but I'm still learning. Thank you all and Happy Christmas.
If true, this explains why Donald J Trump will never get inaugurated and why CJ is legitimate: Pinned Tweet RudolphGiuliani @RudolphGiuliani · 36m36 minutes ago Official Statement - please read & share:
