Charlie and I have shared privately and in public about the way we see Garabandal. I know exactly how we differ. I tried for a long time to dovetail Charlie and Garabandal. I did not succeed. Neither the Warning nor The Miracle can be The Rescue in terms of the timing of Garabandal. Charlie's view of the unfolding of Garabandal does not affect my view one bit. Having been banned several times from here I cannot retrieve my conversations or I would quote him directly. As far as Garabandal goes, for me it has never really been subject to interpretation. Only to acceptance or rejection. I accept and follow and await it as given: 1. Tribulation (Communism), 2. Warning (when things are at their worst) 3. Miracle with Permanent sign and the perfect body of Fr Andreu next day, 4. Chastisement if mankind does not truly convert. Charlie has said he would welcome this sequence but he has been given a less one dimensional and linear view point through his mystical experience. The presentation given to me by Conchita and the girls and all the witnesses and supporters of the traditional and official version satisfies me entirely but I am open to The God of Surprises. I think Charlie is wrong about Garabandal - he believes it is not as simple as generally specified and believed - but somehow I still think him honest about his own personal revelations. He is true to his word and his word is true to him. I do not claim to understand how this can be. I have told many people about his revelation on Trump and Obama about the global collapse and about his Storm and Rescue. If his prophesy about Obama and Trump fail so will my faith in his revelations. But not in Charlie. He is a good man. They will disappear from my conversations after I have been ridiculed by some. Real friends don't ridicule. One of my young patients has set his sites on Garabandal for a cure on the Day of the Miracle. He has Ankylosing Spondylitis. Others have MS and yet others are affected by stroke. Garabandal has given them new hope. Charlie's story lacks this specific promise but he believes in it. He believes the sick who get there will be cured. He believes in The Warning and The Great Miracle but not in the same simple linear way I do. I hope you did not consider me rude asking if you were a supporter of Archbishop Lefebvre (sorry for ommitting his title - I hate it when people call Pope Francis, Bergoglio). If possible I would still like to know. Are you a Traditionalist rather than a traditional Roman Catholic? I actually attended a mass said by him in Chelsea town hall before I decided his direction was wrong.
And love Byron, don't forget the love, the sacrifice in being a sign of hope for others. I am sure you did not forget this.
Apart from getting Gosnell's name wrong what do you mean by saying his case is the most likely instance of the warning for Charlie. What exactly do you mean?
I am aware of Charlie's commentary and mention of Gosnell. There will be a Warning light in the sky - something like two stars colliding. There will also be a permanent supernatural sign at the Pines after the Miracle. Did you mean something else?
He has said this Joe. rescue means rescue afterwards the long process of rebuilding a godly order. For Charlie the next time man rebels after this comes the end. BTW what is your fixation with my Catholic faith all about dude. I am a Catholic plain and simple and a plain and simple one to boot. Hope that is good enough. I am not a tradionalist a garabandalist etc etc etc. Just a Catholic my friend.
After the butcher Gosnell it makes it much more difficult to claim ignorance of the evil of abortion. Hence his evil functions as a kind of warning an awakening of consciences as it were. Also to clear up some loose ends. Firstly it is not I who has called Charlie a false prophet. I started this thread to get a response FROM padraig who did do so. I and a few others were interested in why he came out with this since his initial reason seemed silly. Like many here I am willing to wait till 20th Jan. I have been reading him since the summer of 2014 when Mark Mallett put us on to him. I am not sure now that Mark would do so again but that is by the by. As I have stated numerous times Charlie seems a solid guy to me but nevertheless I have no idea what he is talking about when he says he has been right on the big things to date. Moreover, he has also made some strange predictions such as the whole last normal christmas thing among others. Thus questions were asked it's that simple no hidden agendas.
Good to know you are Catholic. No fixation - just wondering if you had a hidden agenda that colours your comments. Please don't call me "friend" like that. Your point on Gosnell is still lost on me but I am sure you have one. Charlie is a great pro-lifer. I wish you a blessed and peaceful Christmas.
Yes I have a hidden agenda. I am a secret agent on a covert operation sanctioned by the Russians to disrupt the godly work on the MOG forum. The game is up.
I fly to Moscow every weekend for a meeting with the Boss. In fact, I am writing to you right now from the Kremlin. Vladimir approves of the Motheofgod forum. In fact, his closest advisors are concerned that he spends too much time here on the Forum with a secret sock puppet account.
Fallen Saint I owe you an apology. Yours was the first thread I saw that referenced Pope Francis. I saw no harm in posting birthday wishes to him there even though I realized it was not a quote. I did quote the Melchisidek scripture in reference to him and this was taken as a critique and lavish praise which was seen as unfair to those whose differing opinion had been silenced. This was enough to have my comment deleted. I did not foresee your thread on Quotes from Pope Francis being frozen for this so sorry. Thank you Padraig for leaving up the birthday wishes.
Lol what can we do. At least you bumped thread, so people could read our Holy Fathers quotes. Padraigs forum Padraigs rules. Lately he has been quick with the hammer. But thats ok, Gods will.
