ANTONIO YAGüE ALERT: Warning Astro Visualized - CONFIRMED

It's not really that there would be a collision, it's the problem with gravitation.

 

The things that might be "incoming" to do destruction are likely the space junk like meteors or comets that could get pulled by gravity from the tail or otherwise disturbed from the Kuiper Belt, etc. due to the magnetic pulls and gravity pull upon them. Even that prophesied comet could be one of these objects.....not the actual system itself which is due to pass and go back out on its own orbit. It's the severity of these incoming things in general (as Akita sorta describes with fire falling from the sky) that I believe can be mitigated by prayer, sacrifice, and suffering accepted.

 

Yes, I wish I could edit that it should say without any collision.
When I say I go back forth, I mean as to whether the Illumination of Conscience will include an object blocking our sun at all.
Sorry about that.

 

He is not the only one who believes in a brown dwarf star. He is one of the few who will publicly acknowledge it's existence. These astronomers from Cal Tech made a series of announcements. They call it Planet Nine.

01/20/2016
Caltech Researchers Find Evidence of a Real Ninth Planet
Caltech researchers have found evidence of a giant planet tracing a bizarre, highly elongated orbit in the outer solar system. The object, which the researchers have nicknamed Planet Nine, has a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbits about 20 times farther from the sun on average than does Neptune (which orbits the sun at an average distance of 2.8 billion miles). In fact, it would take this new planet between 10,000 and 20,000 years to make just one full orbit around the sun.

The researchers, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown, discovered the planet's existence through mathematical modeling and computer simulations but have not yet observed the object directly.

"This would be a real ninth planet," says Brown, the Richard and Barbara Rosenberg Professor of Planetary Astronomy. "There have only been two true planets discovered since ancient times, and this would be a third. It's a pretty substantial chunk of our solar system that's still out there to be found, which is pretty exciting."

Brown notes that the putative ninth planet—at 5,000 times the mass of Pluto—is sufficiently large that there should be no debate about whether it is a true planet. Unlike the class of smaller objects now known as dwarf planets, Planet Nine gravitationally dominates its neighborhood of the solar system. In fact, it dominates a region larger than any of the other known planets—a fact that Brown says makes it "the most planet-y of the planets in the whole solar system."

Batygin and Brown describe their work in the current issue of the Astronomical Journal and show how Planet Nine helps explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune known as the Kuiper Belt.

"Although we were initially quite skeptical that this planet could exist, as we continued to investigate its orbit and what it would mean for the outer solar system, we become increasingly convinced that it is out there," says Batygin, an assistant professor of planetary science. "For the first time in over 150 years, there is solid evidence that the solar system's planetary census is incomplete."

The road to the theoretical discovery was not straightforward. In 2014, a former postdoc of Brown's, Chad Trujillo, and his colleague Scott Sheppard published a paper noting that 13 of the most distant objects in the Kuiper Belt are similar with respect to an obscure orbital feature. To explain that similarity, they suggested the possible presence of a small planet. Brown thought the planet solution was unlikely, but his interest was piqued.

He took the problem down the hall to Batygin, and the two started what became a year-and-a-half-long collaboration to investigate the distant objects. As an observer and a theorist, respectively, the researchers approached the work from very different perspectives—Brown as someone who looks at the sky and tries to anchor everything in the context of what can be seen, and Batygin as someone who puts himself within the context of dynamics, considering how things might work from a physics standpoint. Those differences allowed the researchers to challenge each other's ideas and to consider new possibilities. "I would bring in some of these observational aspects; he would come back with arguments from theory, and we would push each other. I don't think the discovery would have happened without that back and forth," says Brown. " It was perhaps the most fun year of working on a problem in the solar system that I've ever had."

Fairly quickly Batygin and Brown realized that the six most distant objects from Trujillo and Sheppard's original collection all follow elliptical orbits that point in the same direction in physical space. That is particularly surprising because the outermost points of their orbits move around the solar system, and they travel at different rates.

"It's almost like having six hands on a clock all moving at different rates, and when you happen to look up, they're all in exactly the same place," says Brown. The odds of having that happen are something like 1 in 100, he says. But on top of that, the orbits of the six objects are also all tilted in the same way—pointing about 30 degrees downward in the same direction relative to the plane of the eight known planets. The probability of that happening is about 0.007 percent. "Basically it shouldn't happen randomly," Brown says. "So we thought something else must be shaping these orbits."

The first possibility they investigated was that perhaps there are enough distant Kuiper Belt objects—some of which have not yet been discovered—to exert the gravity needed to keep that subpopulation clustered together. The researchers quickly ruled this out when it turned out that such a scenario would require the Kuiper Belt to have about 100 times the mass it has today.

That left them with the idea of a planet. Their first instinct was to run simulations involving a planet in a distant orbit that encircled the orbits of the six Kuiper Belt objects, acting like a giant lasso to wrangle them into their alignment. Batygin says that almost works but does not provide the observed eccentricities precisely. "Close, but no cigar," he says.

Then, effectively by accident, Batygin and Brown noticed that if they ran their simulations with a massive planet in an anti-aligned orbit—an orbit in which the planet's closest approach to the sun, or perihelion, is 180 degrees across from the perihelion of all the other objects and known planets—the distant Kuiper Belt objects in the simulation assumed the alignment that is actually observed.

"Your natural response is 'This orbital geometry can't be right. This can't be stable over the long term because, after all, this would cause the planet and these objects to meet and eventually collide,'" says Batygin. But through a mechanism known as mean-motion resonance, the anti-aligned orbit of the ninth planet actually prevents the Kuiper Belt objects from colliding with it and keeps them aligned. As orbiting objects approach each other they exchange energy. So, for example, for every four orbits Planet Nine makes, a distant Kuiper Belt object might complete nine orbits. They never collide. Instead, like a parent maintaining the arc of a child on a swing with periodic pushes, Planet Nine nudges the orbits of distant Kuiper Belt objects such that their configuration with relation to the planet is preserved.

"Still, I was very skeptical," says Batygin. "I had never seen anything like this in celestial mechanics."

But little by little, as the researchers investigated additional features and consequences of the model, they became persuaded. "A good theory should not only explain things that you set out to explain. It should hopefully explain things that you didn't set out to explain and make predictions that are testable," says Batygin.

And indeed Planet Nine's existence helps explain more than just the alignment of the distant Kuiper Belt objects. It also provides an explanation for the mysterious orbits that two of them trace. The first of those objects, dubbed Sedna, was discovered by Brown in 2003. Unlike standard-variety Kuiper Belt objects, which get gravitationally "kicked out" by Neptune and then return back to it, Sedna never gets very close to Neptune. A second object like Sedna, known as 2012 VP113, was announced by Trujillo and Sheppard in 2014. Batygin and Brown found that the presence of Planet Nine in its proposed orbit naturally produces Sedna-like objects by taking a standard Kuiper Belt object and slowly pulling it away into an orbit less connected to Neptune.


A predicted consequence of Planet Nine is that a second set of confined objects should also exist. These objects are forced into positions at right angles to Planet Nine and into orbits that are perpendicular to the plane of the solar system. Five known objects (blue) fit this prediction precisely.
Credit: Caltech/R. Hurt (IPAC) [Diagram was created using WorldWide Telescope.]
But the real kicker for the researchers was the fact that their simulations also predicted that there would be objects in the Kuiper Belt on orbits inclined perpendicularly to the plane of the planets. Batygin kept finding evidence for these in his simulations and took them to Brown. "Suddenly I realized there are objects like that," recalls Brown. In the last three years, observers have identified four objects tracing orbits roughly along one perpendicular line from Neptune and one object along another. "We plotted up the positions of those objects and their orbits, and they matched the simulations exactly," says Brown. "When we found that, my jaw sort of hit the floor."

 

C

CONTINUED:

https://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523

 

Alleluia . Thanks dmj.
34 pages of the Sacred Astronomy thread. 10 of this and at long last the one of two or so articles i found on the internet that should be the starting point for trying to decide on the reliability of Antonio Yugue has been posted here. Please consider posting http://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/extinctions-nemesis.html

 

The Cal Tech gentlemen, I believe, are trying to mislead the public away from the real calculations associated with Planet X or the Brown Dwarf Star, or any number of names that this body has been given.

 

Jerry, if you would like to investigate others who seem to agree for the most part with Antonio Yague, look into the videos of Terrel Black Star. This is his most recent update:

 

Hi DMj, yes, this has been all over the news. We've discovered another planet in our own solar system, it is not a star and it is not in another solar system on a "collision course" with ours. In ancient and Medieval times we only knew of 7 planets. Later Neptune and Pluto were discovered in 1846 and 1930, then recently they said Pluto doesn't not count as a planet, and now another planet has been discovered. This is completely different and no one disputes it.

 

Kerry's trip to South Pole. Certainly he didn't need to add to the expense and trouble of others to add the 3 hour flight to the South Pole if all he wanted were reports from Scientists about "climate change". He could have stayed in D.C. for that!

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/in..._in_antarctica_highest_us_official_to_visit_0

 

Thanks, Dawn.

I am having a hard time keeping these straight.

 

I don't have the background to judge but nonetheless such explanation is interesting and at this point as good as the others that I really can't judge either!!

 

I think the term used, "object", is a better description at this point. A ninth "planet" has as yet to be verified for this unknown causing the disruption in the movements of outer planets, etc......what they admit now is "something" that is causing the pull upon our known outer planets. They have rather admitted to some "force" pushing and shoving what can be identified....out there somewhere beyond these.....and this acceptance is something in and of itself.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...erious-object-outer-reaches-solar-system.html

 

He's definitely a bit above my paygrade, but bottom line, he agrees with Antonio Yague. His main difference is the timing of the pole shift. Terrel believes that will occur sometime in April or May of 2017.

 

You said yesterday that there was proof of a planet exploding within the next hours, could you explain this, please?

 

Yes, I want to know if I can take my aluminum foil hat off yet.

 

internet troll

 

This kind of senseless non-scientific conjecture ("exploding planets") makes those of us concerned with verified Church prophecy look like credulous fools.
View attachment 5641

Then why is LV posting on a PUBLIC forum?

 

It is one of possible hypotesis. Conchita saw colision of two stars, NOT asteroides. I suppose, that if this planet is real the planet of Warning, it will collapse with sun and explode. I have more times calculated the trajectory from photos of Carlos. The hypotesis of Antonio Yague is wrong. This planet is more and more incadescent, because it is still closer to sun. I do not say that this is the Warning planet. But if it is, it SHALL explode within few hours or days.

And I thank all, for my new titul Troll. Yes I am really a troll in holliness, but I want to become a giant...
What means the word respond? To answer or to write?
I do not answer/respond to proud Christian hypocrites publicly, because it is not according to Gospel. But I respond to my brothers and sisters.

 

I'm not a Garabandal expert, but I'm fairly certain that Glenn (who is an expert) would insist Conchita did NOT say she saw two exploding stars. She said it was LIKE two stars exploding