"Francis has been totally orthodox..can only be faulted by faulty reading"

Discussion in 'Pope Francis' started by BrianK, Aug 17, 2016.

  1. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels

    just read that joe has been banned... tragic :cry:

    cafeteria closed...

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2016
  2. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    Hi Padraig,

    Yes I do remember her conversation in here. I also know that you did tell her to get some help from a priest.

    As for you your other post......

    "Who appointed you to be judge Janet?

    Who gave the Warrant to sit on Judgement on me?

    Who gave you that right?"

    If you check my posts again you'll see I haven't condemned or judged anyone. I wouldn't do that.
     
  3. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels


    First Question

    Have you been living under a rock?


    Second Question

    Brian has provided facts in relation to my post that you have yet to refute. I can provide more if you like... in fact there is a whole litany of them I am wishing could be explained through the CDF. You really seem to get Pope Francis, so I am hoping you can explain everything to me. Please let me know if you can help me out. Thanks!


    Yours Truly,

    SH


    P.S. Welcome to the forum
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2016
  4. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    Brian..I'm not working with anyone. What's happening in here? Why is everyone on edge?
     
  5. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    Hi SH,

    Sorry I haven't seen your post..I am having problems with my laptop. It keeps freezing. Let me see if I can find it.

    Thank you for the welcome. :)

    Janet
     
  6. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels

    you should get a mac... i haven't had to format my computer in the 5 years I have had it

    the only operating system I like better is ubuntu, but there is hardly any support for them
     
  7. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    I'll try to help if I can SH...
     
  8. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    I don't usually have problems with it..

    If you write down what you'd like help with then I'll come back to it tomorrow as its late here now.

    Good night and God Bless
     
  9. janet Walton

    janet Walton Angels

    I found your post SH ....will answer it tomorrow.
     
  10. BrianK

    BrianK Guest

    A known agenda to attempt to tar any valid criticism of the pope as simply inspired by MDM so it can be mocked and discredited has already attempted to be employed here. But the real MDM deception behind the deception has become obvious:

    As I said on another thread here:​

    [MDM] has been exposed as a fraud and condemned by the Church and is not welcome here.

    Frankly the devil knew what he was doing when he inspired the MDM fraud. He lead many souls astray with its messages.

    But more importantly it made faithful Catholics completely disregard any voices of concern about this pope, thinking any otherwise valid criticism of this pope is inspired by these false messages.

    MDM made the job of actually promoting Truth and defending the Faith very much harder.

    Diabolically cunning.

    Now when folks don't want to consider the words of a poster, they can falsely charge him with being a secret MDM follower. Any message they don't want to hear, they can claim as inspired by this fraud.

    I didn't understand what the devil was up to when the obvious fraud of MDM was exposed. Now I do. Again, diabolically cunning, in disarming faithful Catholics for what is ahead.
    Knowing where you're going with this, because others have already attempted the same tactic, and knowing where it ultimately comes from, gives that right.

    (And see my signature, below.)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 20, 2016
    Mac likes this.
  11. bflocatholic

    bflocatholic Powers

    Am I the only one that can't figure out what the heck is going on with this thread? Bizarre.
     
  12. fallen saint

    fallen saint Baby steps :)

    Brian talking nonsense and handing out pitchforks?

    Padraig thinks he is being attacked.

    New Janet hasn't really said anything bad.

    And joe has been banned for trying to ignore Padraig.

    The devil is with us :(

    May Gods Will be Done
     
  13. BrianK

    BrianK Guest

    Janet thinks she is so wise and so coy. Her agenda is obvious from a mile away. Tar any opposition to this pope to be in bad faith, secretly inspired by MDM, and mock and discredit those defending the Faith, thus silencing anyone who questions this pope and his obvious agenda. I'm sure that's how Joe found her and encouraged her to join his quixotic battle.

    I have to admit this demonic ploy has me irritated, because it's being carried out by otherwise good and decent Catholics who serve the devil's purposes while they are convinced they serve God alone.

    And now that you've flung about your juvenile ad hominem attacks, joining this effort, kindly address the premise of the thread:

    The pope has not taught error in an official magisterial document. But to claim he has been "totally orthodox" is, unfortunately, akin to believing in fairy tales, and destroys the credibility of those making the claim, who might otherwise be good and holy Catholics. Unfortunately, it's no longer a case of unqualified laity who are simply guilty of "faulty reading."

    ...Anyone making the claim that this pope is "totally orthodox" and any other understanding is the result of "faulty reading" can no longer throw about such assertions without refuting the documentation of these theologians first.

    They cannot be accused of "faulty reading" or error based in mistranslation or media spin.


    ...No one can credibly or blithely say to these eminent theologians and priests, "Who are YOU to question the pope?!"

    These men are exceptionally qualified and have the standing and the moral obligation to do so. Anyone who wants to say such things - to anyone, even lowly laity - must thoroughly refute the points in this document first.

    Woe to those Churchmen who remain silent in the face of this affront to Faith and Morals. They will answer to God for their infidelity and cowardice.
    Otherwise, "get behind me..."

    And yes, I've edited this post numerous times. Deal with it.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 20, 2016
    sunburst, Sorrowful Heart and Mac like this.
  14. fallen saint

    fallen saint Baby steps :)

    I really don't want to go through this again. All your arguments are speculation. The world of what if.

    That is judging before the action. Causing fear and creating anti-catholic propaganda. There is no greater evil then causing doubt and fear of the Holy Father and Our Holy Mother Church.

    Sometimes... i wonder if some of you are protestants.

    The Holy Father is preparing for the possibility of war. And i hate to say... the Vatican is a major target. It is located in a spot where it could be destroyed and over run. If that happens, the church will continue with regional powers. This is all speculation but it is possible. I will not argue with you and your excitement... of some little known Catholic theologians.

    Every thread on MOG is becoming anti-pope and anti-church. And you are the leader of this journey. I will not participate in your nonsense. If your speculations do come true...then i will decide if to stay or leave the church. But i certainly won't call our Holy Father names...and be disrepectful. That is evil. Its ok to discuss and debate but you have gone way past that.

    Brother al
     
    Barb H, Yellowcoffeecup and Marie-Lou like this.
  15. Mac

    Mac "To Jesus, through Mary"



    What a joke. Time to wake from your slumber Bro.


    View attachment 5294
     
    little me and picadillo like this.
  16. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels

    First

    Speculation? are you kidding me... you actually believe its "speculation"... I can only imagine what you base this on.

    Second

    No one is calling the Pope names, they are calling him out on his actions. Two very separate things.


    Now if you wish to back up these points you have made with facts and logic, please do so... as I am eager to learn. But seeing as to how you have not done this even once, I highly doubt you will be able to do so now. Which leaves the points you are trying to make empty because they lack substance, this is typically what happens when opinions are based on feelings.
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2016
    little me likes this.
  17. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels

    Its not bizarre... but you have to pay attention to even the slight details... read every word thoroughly.
     
  18. Sorrowful Heart

    Sorrowful Heart Archangels

    This statement is inaccurate, and the way its worded is practically diabolical. Mainly because if a person does not understand the order of obedience, they could follow the Pope into mortal sin. It implies that they are denying God by not acting accordingly to everything the Pope says, when that is just not true. The Church listens to the Laws given by God, therefore it is not the Pope who is the head of the Church it is God. The Pope is merely the head of the Church on earth, he is still subservient to God. Therefore...

    The Laws of God Triumph the Office of the Pope.

    If the Pope calls us to do something that goes contrary to the Laws of God we need to disobey the Pope. Telling people its ok to use contraception in light of the zika virus is contrary to Gods Law. Therefore if someone comes up to me and says that they want to use contraceptives in light of the zika virus because the Pope said its ok, I have to go against the Popes comments and tell that person they are committing a mortal sin by using contraceptives, regardless of what the Pope has said. So while I have not listened to the Pope in this instance, I still have listened to the Church.
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2016
  19. davidtlig

    davidtlig Guest

    It is indeed bizarre, bfc, but careful reading of the posts since Janet made her first contribution should uncover and illustrate what has been at work on the forum for some time.
     
    Teresa likes this.
  20. "Quis ut Deus"

    "Quis ut Deus" ADMIN Staff Member

    It would be nice if you did ;)


    Padraig changed his avatar to the beautiful picture of Our lady which I prefer ;)..
    The reason it says that Padriag is a new member is because he likes to be at the bottom of the list,I find that quite humble and not a reason to insult someone.. Janet if you where here long enough you would no that and if you look at other members avatars you will see different ranks i.e powers angels etc that is based on how long and how many posts a person has ..

    I am not getting into this thread debate but will keep an eye on things from a moderation point of view boxing gloves are ok but keep all punches above the belt ;) consider that a first , open and public warning..
     

Share This Page